< Back to IRS

Julian Paolo

How to properly report K-1 income from a multi-state Partnership LLC investment

I'm trying to figure out how to handle a confusing situation with my partnership income across multiple states. Here's my situation: 1. I currently live in Wisconsin (state A) and I invested in an LLC that's officially formed as a Partnership in Colorado (state B). 2. The Partnership I invested in has then gone and put money into some real estate LLCs located in both Nevada (state C) and Florida (state D). 3. Those real estate LLCs in Nevada and Florida issue K-1s to the main Partnership in Colorado. 4. Then the Colorado Partnership issues a K-1 to me personally. This is where it gets complicated: The Partnership sends me a federal K-1 showing my share of income/losses, but it also includes information from Nevada and Florida's state tax forms. I'm confused about how to properly report this on my Wisconsin state tax return. Do I need to file state tax returns in all four states? Or just Wisconsin? The Colorado Partnership is saying I might need to file in Nevada and Florida too because of the pass-through income, but that seems excessive since I've never even visited those states. Has anyone dealt with multi-state K-1 reporting like this before? What's the right approach here?

Ella Knight

•

So you've got a fairly common multi-state partnership situation, though it can definitely be confusing when you're dealing with real estate in multiple states! The general rule is that you'll need to file a nonresident return in any state where the partnership has income-producing activity and that state imposes an income tax. The good news? Nevada doesn't have a state income tax, so you won't need to file there despite having K-1 income from property in that state. For Florida, there's more good news - Florida also doesn't have a personal income tax for individuals. They do have corporate income tax, but that wouldn't apply to you as an individual partner. For Colorado (where your main partnership is based), you'll need to check if your specific partnership activities created nexus there. If the partnership just serves as a pass-through entity and doesn't actually conduct business operations in Colorado, you might not need to file there either. Wisconsin, as your resident state, will want to tax your worldwide income, but they'll typically give you credit for taxes paid to other states to avoid double taxation.

0 coins

Julian Paolo

•

Thanks for the detailed response! That's a relief about Nevada and Florida not requiring state income tax filings. What about the K-1s themselves though? The K-1 I get from the Colorado partnership shows income from all these different states. Do I just report the total income on my Wisconsin return, or do I need to somehow break it down by state? And does Colorado require me to file anything since the partnership is based there, even if they're just passing through income from other states?

0 coins

Ella Knight

•

You'll report the total income from the K-1 on your Wisconsin return since as a resident, Wisconsin taxes your worldwide income. You don't need to break it down by state on your Wisconsin return, but keep all the K-1 documentation in case of questions. For Colorado, if the partnership is just a holding company that passes through income from other states, you might not have filing requirements there. However, this depends on how the partnership operates. If the partnership conducts business in Colorado (management activities, meetings, etc.), then Colorado might consider you to have nexus, requiring a nonresident return. I recommend checking with the partnership's tax preparer - they should provide information about which states require partner filings.

0 coins

I was in a similar mess last year with partnership K-1s across multiple states. I tried figuring it out myself but ended up making errors that caused me to get notices from two different state tax agencies. I finally used https://taxr.ai to sort through all my partnership documents. Their system analyzed my K-1s and clearly explained exactly which states I needed to file in and which ones I could skip. The tool caught something my previous accountant missed - my partnership was actually conducting administrative functions in Colorado which created filing requirements there, even though the income was generated elsewhere. They also helped me understand the state tax credit system to avoid double taxation on the same income.

0 coins

Does this taxr.ai thing actually work with complicated K-1 situations? I've got investments in partnerships across 6 different states and my accountant charges me an extra $200 per state. How accurate is it with multiple layers of pass-through entities?

0 coins

Jade Santiago

•

I'm skeptical about these online tools for complex tax situations. How does taxr.ai handle the nuances of different states' sourcing rules? Some states look at where the property is located while others focus on where management decisions are made. Did it actually give you specific advice based on each state's unique requirements?

0 coins

It absolutely works with complicated K-1 situations. I had K-1s from three different partnerships with investments across multiple states. The system correctly identified that two of the states had economic nexus rules that didn't require filing based on my limited ownership percentage. It saved me from filing unnecessary returns. For the sourcing rules question, the system actually does account for different state approaches. It analyzed my documents and flagged that one state was using market-based sourcing while another used cost of performance. It then showed exactly how my income should be allocated under each state's rules. I was impressed by how it caught the specific nuances that had confused both me and my previous accountant.

0 coins

Just wanted to follow up about my experience with taxr.ai after our discussion here. I uploaded my pile of K-1s from my various partnerships (I have 6 across different states like I mentioned) and the system actually identified that I only needed to file in 3 states rather than all 6. The tool flagged that two of the states where my partnerships owned property don't actually require nonresident returns unless you have physical presence or exceed certain income thresholds - which I didn't. It also spotted that one partnership's K-1 had incorrectly assigned state income that should have been sourced to my home state instead. Honestly saved me a ton in preparation fees and helped me avoid filing unnecessary state returns. Can't believe how much clearer everything seems now!

0 coins

Caleb Stone

•

If you're still struggling with getting answers on your multi-state K-1 situation, you might want to try contacting the state tax departments directly. I had a similar issue last year and spent WEEKS trying to get through to the Colorado Department of Revenue to clarify my filing obligations. After countless attempts with busy signals and disconnects, I found https://claimyr.com which got me through to an actual human at the tax department within 27 minutes. There's a video showing how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent I spoke with confirmed that as a nonresident partner, I didn't need to file in Colorado since the partnership itself handles the state filing obligations for nonresident partners through a composite return. This was completely different from what I'd understood from my K-1 instructions and saved me from unnecessary filings.

0 coins

Daniel Price

•

Wait, what exactly is this service? Does it just sit on hold with the tax department for you? I've literally spent hours trying to reach someone at the Wisconsin DOR about partnership filing requirements. How much does this cost?

0 coins

Olivia Evans

•

This sounds like a scam. Why would I pay someone else to call a government agency that should be providing free taxpayer assistance? If you can't get through, that's the state's problem. They should hire more staff or improve their phone systems instead of making us pay third parties. I'll just keep calling until I get through.

0 coins

Caleb Stone

•

It's not a call service - it uses an automated system to navigate the phone trees and wait on hold for you. When a human agent finally answers, you get a call back and are connected immediately. It saved me literally hours of my life on hold. The Wisconsin DOR is actually one of the more difficult ones to reach during tax season. I spent over 3 hours trying to get through on my own before giving up. With Claimyr, I was connected to an agent in about 45 minutes, but I didn't have to actually sit on hold during that time - I was able to get other work done. When they connected me, the agent was able to confirm exactly which forms I needed for my multi-state partnership income.

0 coins

Olivia Evans

•

I have to publicly eat my words about Claimyr being a scam. After our exchange here, I decided to give it a try since I still couldn't get through to the tax department on my own after multiple attempts. The service actually worked exactly as described. I got a callback when they reached an agent, and I finally got clear answers about my partnership filing requirements. The agent confirmed I only needed to file a nonresident return in states where the partnership had physical operations, not in every state where it simply had passive investment income. This would have taken me days of repeated calls to figure out on my own. Sometimes it's worth using a service that saves you time and frustration, especially when dealing with complicated tax situations where getting the right answer matters.

0 coins

Just to add another perspective here - I've been dealing with multi-state partnership income for years and found that keeping a detailed spreadsheet is essential. You should track: 1. Each state where income is sourced 2. The type of income in each state (rental, business, etc.) 3. Whether the partnership itself files composite returns in each state 4. Each state's filing thresholds for nonresidents Not all partnerships handle state filings the same way. Some will file composite returns that cover your tax liability in their state, while others will just issue K-1s and expect you to handle the filings yourself. Also, don't forget that even if a state doesn't have income tax (like Nevada and Florida in your case), you might still have filing requirements if your partnership has presence in other states with income tax.

0 coins

Aiden Chen

•

How can you tell from the K-1 whether the partnership files a composite return that includes your income? My K-1s don't seem to indicate this clearly, and I've been filing individual nonresident returns in each state just to be safe.

0 coins

Look for a statement or checkbox on the K-1 or supplemental information that indicates whether your share of income was included in a composite return. It's often labeled something like "Partner's income included in composite return" or similar wording. If you don't see this information, contact the partnership directly. The partnership should be able to tell you if they've included your share of income in a composite filing. If they have, they should also provide you with information about how much tax was paid on your behalf. This is important because your resident state will typically want to know this to give you proper credit for taxes paid to other states.

0 coins

Zoey Bianchi

•

I think everyone is overlooking an important aspect of multi-state partnership reporting - the withholding requirements. Many states require partnerships to withhold taxes for nonresident partners, regardless of whether you ultimately need to file a return there. Check your K-1s carefully - they should indicate if any state taxes were withheld on your behalf. If taxes were withheld, you'll likely need to file a nonresident return in that state, even if you otherwise wouldn't have a filing requirement, just to get a refund of over-withheld amounts. This happened to me with a partnership that withheld Oregon state taxes at their highest marginal rate, but after applying deductions and credits, my actual Oregon liability was much lower. I had to file an Oregon nonresident return to get back about $2,300 in over-withheld taxes.

0 coins

This is a really good point. I missed this one year and realized later that one of my partnerships had withheld state taxes in Illinois that I never claimed back because I didn't file there. Do you know if there's a time limit for going back and filing to get those withholdings refunded?

0 coins

Most states have a 3-4 year statute of limitations for claiming refunds of overpaid taxes, but it varies by state. Illinois typically allows 4 years from the original due date of the return to file for a refund. So if this was from your 2020 tax year, you'd have until April 2025 to file an Illinois nonresident return and claim those withholdings. I'd recommend checking the specific statute of limitations for Illinois on their Department of Revenue website, or calling them directly. Even if you're close to the deadline, it's usually worth filing - I've seen people recover significant amounts from partnership withholdings they forgot about. Just make sure you have all the documentation from that year's K-1 showing the withholding amounts.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today