IRS

CommunityGovernment Services

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

For a gift of stock, what is the recipient's cost basis when stocks are transferred?

I recently gifted some stocks to my daughter by transferring them from my brokerage account to hers. She ended up selling them a few months later, and now we're trying to figure out the tax implications. Here are the specifics of what happened: First stock: My original cost basis was $26 per share. When I transferred it to her, the fair market value (FMV) was $23 per share. She ended up selling at $22 per share. Second stock: My original cost basis was $15 per share. At the time of transfer, the FMV had dropped to $13 per share. However, she sold it when it bounced back to $17 per share. I'm confused about what cost basis she's supposed to use when reporting the sale on her taxes. Does she use the FMV at the time I gifted her the stocks? Or does my original cost basis carry over to her? I want to make sure she reports this correctly for the 2025 tax filing season.

Don't forget that your daughter will need to file Form 8949 along with Schedule D to report these stock sales. The "Code" column needs to indicate these were gifted shares. For the stock sold at a loss where FMV at time of gift applies, she should use code "B" and attach an explanation.

0 coins

Thanks for mentioning that! Do I need to do anything on my tax return to report that I gave her these stocks? I think I read something about gift tax forms if the amount is over a certain value.

0 coins

If the total value of all gifts you gave to your daughter in the calendar year exceeds the annual gift tax exclusion (which is $17,000 for 2023, and will likely be higher for 2025), then you would need to file Form 709 (Gift Tax Return). Even if you do have to file Form 709, you likely won't owe any actual gift tax unless you've used up your lifetime gift tax exemption, which is several million dollars. The form is more for tracking purposes.

0 coins

Remember that the holding period for gifted stock transfers with the gift! So if you held the stock for over a year before gifting it, and your daughter sells it immediately, she still gets long-term capital gains treatment. This is different from inherited stock where the basis gets stepped up but the holding period resets.

0 coins

Wait, really? So if my dad gives me stock he's held for 10 years and I sell it the next day, I still get the lower long-term capital gains tax rate? That seems like a huge advantage!

0 coins

Exactly! That's one of the key benefits of receiving gifted stock versus inherited stock. With gifted stock, you get the donor's holding period, so if they held it for over a year, you immediately qualify for long-term capital gains rates even if you sell right away. This is called "tacking" the holding periods together. It's definitely a tax advantage worth considering when families are doing financial planning with stock transfers.

0 coins

How to determine a reasonable salary for S-Corp when business revenue changes drastically

My S-Corp did decent in 2024 but it's looking like 2025 might be a completely different story in terms of profit. For context, last year the business brought in about $130k and I paid myself a W-2 salary of $65k. However, this year I'm seeing signs that revenue could jump to around $520k (though obviously that's not guaranteed - something could tank and I'd end up back at $130k again). I'm struggling with how to handle my W-2 salary given this potential massive increase in business profits. Should I proactively raise my salary now? Wait until I see actual revenue coming in? Does the IRS expect you to base your reasonable salary on previous year's numbers or projected income? I don't want to get flagged for having too low of a salary if profits are high, but also don't want to commit to a huge salary if things don't pan out as expected. Any advice on how to approach this?

You might consider implementing a quarterly dividend strategy alongside a reasonable base salary. This is what I do - I pay myself a consistent reasonable base that covers my actual work (based on market rates for my position), then distribute profits as needed through distributions. Remember that while S-Corp distributions aren't subject to self-employment tax, they ARE subject to income tax. And the IRS is very clear that you can't take distributions without a reasonable salary first.

0 coins

That seems like a smart approach. So in practice, how do you handle this? Do you start with a somewhat conservative base salary and then do quarterly reviews to determine distributions? And do you ever adjust the base salary mid-year if business is significantly better or worse than expected?

0 coins

I start with a base salary that would be reasonable to hire someone to replace me in my role - I actually got quotes from headhunters for similar positions to document this amount. I review quarterly but rarely change the base unless my duties significantly change. For distributions, I first ensure all business cash flow needs are covered (including reserves for taxes and future expenses), then distribute a portion of excess profits quarterly. In exceptionally good quarters, I sometimes pay myself a W-2 bonus rather than taking it all as distributions - this looks better for maintaining that reasonable salary requirement while still giving me flexibility. The key is having a documented methodology that shows you're not artificially suppressing salary to avoid payroll taxes.

0 coins

The uncertainty you're facing is totally understandable - that's a massive potential revenue jump! Here's what I'd recommend based on going through something similar: Start with a conservative approach for Q1. Set your salary based on a blend of last year's performance plus modest growth expectations - maybe bump from $65k to around $75-80k to start. This keeps your fixed commitment manageable while acknowledging some growth. Then implement quarterly reviews. As you hit Q2 and Q3, if the revenue is materializing as projected, you can either: 1. Increase your base salary mid-year (requires payroll adjustments) 2. Pay yourself W-2 bonuses quarterly to catch up 3. Take the excess as distributions (though remember you need that reasonable salary first) The IRS doesn't expect you to predict the future perfectly, but they do expect you to make reasonable adjustments as circumstances change. Document everything - why you set the initial salary, what factors you considered for increases, and how you determined what's "reasonable" for your role and industry. Most importantly, focus on what you'd need to pay someone else to do your job, not on percentages of profit. Your duties might not change much even if revenue quadruples, so your salary shouldn't necessarily scale directly with profits.

0 coins

Why is property tax a thing? Is it fair to make homeowners pay just to keep their homes?

So I recently bought my first house after years of saving, and I just got hit with my first property tax bill. It's nearly $4,300 for the year and I'm honestly shocked. This feels like I'm just renting my house from the government after I already paid for it! Why do we have to keep paying just to own something we already purchased? What's the actual justification for property tax? I understand income tax (even if I don't like it), but taxing people just for owning a home seems wrong. What happens if someone loses their job or has medical bills and suddenly can't afford to pay their property tax? Can they just take your house away even if you own it outright? My grandmother is on a fixed income and I'm worried about her too. It just seems like we should be able to truly own our homes without this constant threat hanging over us. Does anyone actually know the reasoning behind property tax and if there's any way to reduce it? I'm in Texas if that matters.

If you're stressed about your property taxes, check with your county about installment plans. Most places let you pay quarterly or monthly instead of one big bill. Also look into contesting your assessment if you think your home is overvalued.

0 coins

This! I contested my assessment last year and got it reduced by 15%. The county had my lot size wrong and claimed I had a finished basement when I don't. Totally worth the effort.

0 coins

Property tax is the oldest form of taxation in America dating back to colonial times. It's actually more equitable than most people think because it's a wealth tax rather than an income tax. Someone sitting on a million-dollar paid-off home should contribute more to local services than someone in a smaller home, even if their current incomes are similar. The problem is that it doesn't account for cash flow. Someone might be house-rich but cash-poor (like many elderly). That's why most states have programs for seniors, disabled folks, and those with lower incomes. The system isn't perfect, but there's logic behind it.

0 coins

That's all fine in theory but it falls apart when housing values skyrocket but incomes don't. My parents bought their house for $85k in 1992. Now it's valued at $625k for tax purposes, but their retirement income hasn't increased 7x! They're being taxed out of the home they've lived in for 30 years. How is that fair?

0 coins

@NebulaNova You raise a really important point about the disconnect between property values and income. This is exactly why many states have implemented property tax caps or homestead exemptions that limit how much taxes can increase year over year for longtime residents. Your parents' situation is unfortunately common - they should definitely look into senior exemptions and tax freeze programs. Many states offer property tax caps for seniors that freeze their tax bill at the level when they turn 65, regardless of rising home values. Texas has some good programs for this, though requirements vary by county. It might be worth having them contact their county tax assessor to see what relief options are available. The whole system really needs reform to better account for these situations where paper wealth doesn't translate to actual ability to pay.

0 coins

How Does PSO Health Insurance Affect MAGI Calculation for Tax Purposes?

Title: How Does PSO Health Insurance Affect MAGI Calculation for Tax Purposes? 1 I'm a retired firefighter trying to figure out this tax situation and it's driving me crazy. My department lets retired public safety officers like me exclude health insurance premiums from pension distributions, but I have no idea how this works with MAGI calculations. Specifically, I'm trying to figure out if this affects my MAGI for determining sales tax deductions. Is this considered a non-taxable distribution that would need to be added back when calculating MAGI? Or is this treated differently for PSOs? I've been looking through IRS publications but I'm getting confused with all the different rules for retirement accounts, distributions, and what counts or doesn't count for MAGI. Any help would be appreciated! I'm trying to plan my expenses for next year and need to know how this will impact my tax situation.

23 Has anyone here used TurboTax to handle the PSO health insurance exclusion? I'm wondering if it has a specific input for this or if I need to somehow manually adjust my income to account for it.

0 coins

11 I used TurboTax last year for this exact situation. When you enter your 1099-R information, there's a section specifically for the "Public Safety Officer's Insurance Exclusion" after you input all your basic pension info. It will ask if you're an eligible retired public safety officer and if you had insurance premiums paid directly from your pension. Then it asks for the amount (up to the $3,000 limit). It's pretty straightforward once you get to that section, but it's easy to miss if you're rushing through the interview process. If you've already entered your 1099-R info, you might need to go back and look for this specific section to make the adjustment.

0 coins

12 Great discussion here! As someone who went through this exact situation a few years ago, I wanted to add that it's also worth keeping detailed records of your health insurance premium payments throughout the year, even though they're being deducted directly from your pension. The IRS could potentially ask for documentation during an audit to verify that the excluded amount was actually used for qualifying health insurance or long-term care premiums. I keep copies of my insurance statements showing the monthly premium amounts, plus documentation from my pension administrator showing how much was deducted each month. Also, don't forget that this exclusion applies to both health insurance AND qualified long-term care insurance premiums, up to the combined $3,000 limit. Some retired officers miss the long-term care piece and could be excluding more if they have both types of coverage.

0 coins

What tax-efficient investment vehicles avoid taxes on income producing assets?

So I recently put a big chunk of money (around $180,000) into a high-yield savings account that's been generating about $900 in monthly interest. When tax time rolled around, I was completely blindsided by how much I owed the IRS on this interest income! I don't actually need this monthly interest to live on right now - it was just a place to park my cash while I figured out my next investment move. I typically invest in ETFs, but thought I'd take advantage of the higher rates lately with this savings account and a money market fund. My question is about tax efficiency. Since I don't need this income currently, what's the smartest investment vehicle to minimize my tax exposure? I'm trying to understand the tax differences between interest income versus dividends from ETFs. Are dividends taxed more favorably? Should I just go with a broad market ETF that has minimal dividend payouts? I'm in a pretty high tax bracket due to my job (making about $275K annually), so I'm wondering if I should just forget about generating income from investments until retirement when I'll be in a lower bracket? Are there specific tax-advantaged vehicles I should consider for income-producing assets?

If you're interested in ETFs, look into tax-managed index funds or ETFs specifically designed for tax efficiency. Vanguard's VIG (dividend appreciation) might be worth checking out - it focuses on companies that grow their dividends rather than just high current yield, which can be more tax-efficient. VWELX (Wellington) is another one that tries to balance income with tax efficiency.

0 coins

VWELX is a mutual fund, not an ETF. There's a big difference in tax efficiency there. Mutual funds often distribute capital gains at year-end which can create unexpected tax bills. ETFs have a structural advantage for tax efficiency because of how they handle redemptions.

0 coins

Given your high tax bracket ($275K income), I'd strongly recommend prioritizing tax-efficient growth over income-producing assets in taxable accounts. Here's what's worked for me in a similar situation: 1. **Broad market index ETFs with low dividend yields** - Something like VTI or ITOT focuses on total return rather than dividends, letting you control when you realize gains through strategic selling. 2. **Tax-loss harvesting** - This becomes incredibly valuable at your income level. You can harvest up to $3K in losses annually against ordinary income, plus carry forward any excess. 3. **Asset location strategy** - Keep your bond/REIT investments in tax-advantaged accounts (401k/IRA) and growth investments in taxable accounts. This maximizes the tax benefits of each account type. 4. **Consider Roth conversions** - If you have traditional IRA funds, strategic Roth conversions during lower income years could make sense long-term. For that $180K, I'd personally move most of it into a broad market ETF with minimal distributions (like VTI with ~1.3% dividend yield vs your savings account generating taxable interest). The qualified dividends will be taxed at capital gains rates (likely 15% for you) rather than your marginal rate of 32-35%. Don't completely avoid income - just be strategic about the type and timing.

0 coins

Prev1...14381439144014411442...5645Next