IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

AstroAce

•

I work at a tax preparation office and we've been seeing these scam letters constantly this year. Real IRS letters will have: - A notice number (CP###) or letter number (LTR ###) - Your tax ID number - Specific tax year information - Clear explanation of what's owed and why - Multiple ways to respond (mail, phone, online) Most importantly, you can ALWAYS verify by calling the main IRS number or checking your online account at irs.gov. Never call numbers from a suspicious letter!

0 coins

Eli Butler

•

Thanks for sharing this - it's such a common issue right now! I've been helping my elderly neighbors with similar scam letters lately. One thing I'd add is that legitimate IRS notices will also have a specific payment stub at the bottom if you actually owe money, and they'll give you multiple payment options including paying online through the official IRS website. The "time-sensitive" language is a huge red flag - the IRS gives you plenty of time to respond and won't threaten immediate action without proper documentation. Real IRS notices also explain your appeal rights very clearly. If you're still unsure after checking your online IRS account, you can also take the letter to any local IRS Taxpayer Assistance Center where they can verify it in person. But honestly, based on your description (vague details, wrong phone number, threatening language), this sounds like a classic scam. Don't feel bad about being cautious - these scammers are getting really good at making fake letters look official. Better to double-check than to ignore something legitimate or fall for something fake!

0 coins

Ava Garcia

•

This is really comprehensive advice! I'm new to dealing with tax stuff and honestly didn't even know the IRS had physical assistance centers. That sounds like a great option for people who want face-to-face verification. One question - do you need an appointment to visit a Taxpayer Assistance Center, or can you just walk in with the suspicious letter? I'm dealing with something similar and the online account verification might not be enough to calm my nerves. Sometimes talking to a real person helps! Also really appreciate everyone sharing their experiences here. Makes me feel less alone in dealing with this kind of scary mail.

0 coins

I've been dealing with partnership K-1s for about 5 years now, and those Box 20 Code \ entries used to really stress me out too! What I've learned is that these codes are essentially the partnership's way of providing you with additional information that doesn't fit neatly into the standard boxes. For your specific situation with energy partnerships, those Code \ entries are very common. Energy partnerships often have complex depreciation schedules, depletion allowances, and other industry-specific items that need to be communicated to partners. The key thing to remember is that most of this information is for your records and future reference rather than immediate reporting. Here's what I do each year: I create a simple folder (digital or physical) for each partnership and save all the K-1 information, including those Box 20 notes. When tax time comes around, I enter the main K-1 data into my tax software, but I also make sure to save those Box 20 details separately. This has been incredibly helpful the few times I've had questions from the IRS or when I was considering selling one of my partnership interests. The most important advice I can give is don't overthink it for your current year return. Focus on getting the main K-1 items reported correctly, and treat those Box 20 codes as important documentation to keep with your tax records.

0 coins

This is really reassuring to hear from someone with 5 years of experience! I was definitely overthinking it and getting stressed about potentially missing something important. Your folder system sounds like a great approach - I think I'll set up something similar to track all this information across my different partnerships. One quick follow-up question: when you mention saving the Box 20 details separately, do you just keep copies of the actual K-1 forms, or do you create some kind of summary document? I'm wondering if there's a more organized way to track this information, especially since I'm planning to add more partnership investments over the next few years. Also, has the IRS ever actually asked you about any of these Box 20 entries during an audit or review? I keep worrying that I'm missing something that could trigger problems down the road.

0 coins

Connor Murphy

•

I actually do both - I keep the original K-1 forms but also maintain a simple Excel spreadsheet that summarizes the key Box 20 information by year and partnership. My spreadsheet has columns for: Partnership Name, Tax Year, Box 20 Code, Description, Amount (if applicable), and Notes. This makes it much easier to spot trends or find specific information quickly. For the IRS question - I've been through one audit (completely unrelated to partnerships), and they never asked about the Box 20 entries specifically. They were more focused on the main income/loss items from the K-1s. However, having that organized documentation gave me confidence during the process. The auditor actually complimented me on my record-keeping when I showed them my partnership folder system. As you add more partnerships, you'll definitely appreciate having a systematic approach. Some partnerships change their Box 20 reporting style from year to year, so having historical data helps you understand if something unusual pops up. Plus, if you ever work with a tax professional, they'll love you for being so organized!

0 coins

Yuki Ito

•

I've been working with partnership K-1s for several years as a tax professional, and I want to add some clarity about those Box 20 Code \ entries that several people have mentioned here. The backslash code is indeed a catch-all for miscellaneous information, but it's important to understand that while these entries are often informational for your current year return, they can have significant implications for your tax situation. The Section 751 assets and unrecaptured Section 1250 gain information mentioned earlier are perfect examples - they're not just "nice to know" details, they're legally required disclosures that partnerships must provide. For current year reporting, you're generally correct that these don't require separate line entries on your Form 1040. However, I always recommend reviewing each Box 20 entry carefully because some partnerships do include items that need current year reporting - things like interest expense limitations under Section 163(j) or bonus depreciation adjustments. One thing I haven't seen mentioned here is that if you're subject to the Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT), some of these Box 20 entries might affect that calculation. Energy partnerships in particular often have items that can impact your NIIT liability. My advice: keep detailed records of all Box 20 information, but don't stress about finding a specific place to report most of it on your current return. Focus on accuracy with the main K-1 items, and treat the Box 20 codes as important supplemental information for your tax records.

0 coins

Josef Tearle

•

For the official IRS guidance you're looking for, check out Publication 925 (Passive Activity and At-Risk Rules) - specifically pages 6-7 which cover the disposition of passive activities. This explains exactly how your $125K in carried forward passive losses become fully deductible when you sell the rental property. Also look at Publication 544 (Sales and Other Dispositions of Assets) which covers the depreciation recapture rules. The key point is that Internal Revenue Code Section 469(g) allows all suspended passive losses to be deducted in the year you completely dispose of your interest in the passive activity. You're right that they're separate calculations - you'll pay up to 25% on the $132K depreciation recapture, but you'll also get to deduct the full $125K in passive losses against your other income. So while you have about $7K in "economic profit," your tax situation will be quite different due to how these items are treated separately on your return. Make sure your tax preparer understands this - I've seen many get confused about how the passive loss suspension rules work upon full disposition of a rental property.

0 coins

Thanks for pointing to the specific publications! I've been struggling to find the exact IRS guidance on this situation. Just to make sure I understand correctly - when you say the passive losses become "fully deductible against other income," does that mean they can offset things like my W-2 wages and other ordinary income? Or are there still limitations on what types of income they can offset? I want to make sure I'm not missing any nuances before I meet with my tax preparer. The $125K deduction would be huge for reducing my overall tax liability this year if it can truly offset all my other income sources.

0 coins

Thais Soares

•

Yes, when you fully dispose of a passive activity (like selling your rental property), the suspended passive losses can offset ALL types of income - including W-2 wages, business income, portfolio income, and other ordinary income. This is the key benefit of IRC Section 469(g). The passive loss limitations that normally restrict these losses to only offsetting passive income are completely suspended in the year of full disposition. So your $125K in accumulated losses can indeed reduce your overall taxable income dollar-for-dollar, potentially saving you significant taxes depending on your marginal tax rate. The only caveat is that if you have other passive activities with income, the losses would first offset that passive income, then any excess can offset your non-passive income. But in most cases, people in your situation see a substantial reduction in their overall tax liability for the year. Make sure your tax preparer files Form 8582 correctly to show the full disposition and the release of all suspended losses. This is where I've seen mistakes happen most often.

0 coins

Keisha Brown

•

I went through this exact scenario two years ago and can confirm what others have shared here. The key thing to understand is that when you sell your rental property, you're "fully disposing" of that passive activity, which triggers IRC Section 469(g) - this allows ALL your suspended passive losses from that property to become deductible against any type of income in the year of sale. Here's what actually happened in my case with similar numbers: - Had $140K in depreciation recapture (taxed at 25% = $35K in taxes) - Had $130K in accumulated passive losses that became fully deductible - The $130K deduction saved me about $45K in taxes at my marginal rate - Net result: despite the depreciation recapture, I actually got a significant tax benefit overall The forms you'll need are Form 4797 for the property sale and depreciation recapture, and Form 8582 to show the disposition of the passive activity and release of suspended losses. Make sure your tax preparer understands the Section 469(g) rules - mine initially missed this and almost cost me thousands. One last tip: if you've been doing your own taxes with software, this is probably the year to use a professional who specializes in real estate transactions. The interaction between these rules can be complex and the stakes are high with the dollar amounts involved.

0 coins

NeonNinja

•

This is incredibly helpful to see a real example with actual numbers! Your situation sounds almost identical to what I'm facing. I'm curious - when you say your tax preparer "initially missed this," what exactly did they get wrong? Did they try to keep the passive losses suspended instead of releasing them, or was there something else? Also, you mentioned using a professional who specializes in real estate transactions. Do you have any recommendations for finding someone with the right expertise? I've been doing my own taxes for years but you're absolutely right that the stakes are too high here to risk getting it wrong. One more question - did you have to amend any prior year returns, or was everything handled correctly just by filing the current year return with the property sale?

0 coins

Amina Diallo

•

One thing to consider - contributions made in installments over the year. I had a client who made 4 separate contributions to a foreign partnership, each around $30k, totaling $120k for the year. Does anyone know if these are aggregated for the $100k threshold? The regulations aren't super clear on timing.

0 coins

Yes, the $100,000 threshold applies to the aggregate of all transfers made during the tax year. So in your case, even though each individual contribution was under $100k, since they totaled over $100k for the year, Form 8865 filing would be required as a Category 3 filer. The instructions state: "A U.S. person that contributed property during the tax year to a foreign partnership in exchange for an interest in the partnership..." So it's the cumulative contributions during the tax year that matter, not individual transfers.

0 coins

Your interpretation is absolutely correct. Since your client contributed $475,000 to the foreign partnership, they definitely meet the Category 3 filing requirements under IRC Section 6038B(b)(1). The $100,000 threshold is clear - any US person who contributes property with a fair market value exceeding $100,000 to a foreign partnership must file Form 8865, regardless of their ownership percentage. The 10% ownership test and the $100,000 contribution test are alternative triggers, not cumulative requirements. Meeting either one requires filing. In this case, even though your client only has a 2.25% interest, the substantial contribution amount makes filing mandatory. Make sure to complete Schedule O (Transfer of Property to a Foreign Partnership) along with the main form. You'll need detailed information about the property transferred, its fair market value at the time of contribution, and any gain recognized on the transfer. Given the high-net-worth nature of your client, I'd also recommend documenting your analysis thoroughly in case of future IRS inquiries.

0 coins

Nathan Kim

•

This is really helpful confirmation! I'm new to international tax reporting and was getting overwhelmed by all the different categories and thresholds. Just to make sure I understand - if a client makes multiple smaller contributions throughout the year that add up to over $100k, those would also aggregate to trigger the Category 3 requirement, correct? Also, when you mention documenting the analysis thoroughly, what specific documentation would you recommend keeping beyond the standard partnership agreement and contribution records? I want to make sure I'm building a complete file for this type of high-value international reporting.

0 coins

Just wanted to jump in with something no one's mentioned - make sure you're tracking everything in the RIGHT tax year!! I made the mistake of filing startup expenses from December 2023 on my 2024 return and got a letter from the IRS. You have to claim expenses in the tax year you actually paid them, even if your business hasn't launched yet. You can go back and amend prior year returns if needed.

0 coins

This isn't entirely accurate. If they're truly "startup" expenses before the business is actually in existence, IRS Publication 535 says they're not deductible until the month when the active business begins. You can elect to deduct up to $5,000 immediately once the business starts, with the rest amortized over 15 years.

0 coins

Xan Dae

•

Great question! I went through this exact same situation when I was starting my freelance graphic design business. You absolutely CAN file a Schedule C even without income yet, but there are some important things to keep in mind. The key distinction is between "startup costs" and "business expenses." True startup costs (before your business is actually operational) can only be deducted once your business begins - up to $5,000 in the first year, with the remainder amortized over 15 years. However, if you're already actively conducting business activities (even without revenue), those can be current year deductions. Since you mentioned spending on equipment, software, and courses, document WHY each expense was necessary for your business and WHEN you plan to launch. The IRS looks for genuine intent to make a profit, not just tax benefits. Keep a business journal showing your planning activities, market research, and steps toward launch. One tip: consider whether waiting until you actually start generating income might be simpler for your first year. You could still claim those startup costs retroactively once you begin operations. But if you're confident in your business plan and timeline, filing now is totally legitimate - just be prepared to show you're serious about this as a business, not a hobby.

0 coins

Prev1...13991400140114021403...5643Next