


Ask the community...
Your mom definitely cannot use your 1098-T form for education tax credits if she's not claiming you as a dependent. The IRS is very clear on this - only the person who claims the student as a dependent can claim education credits like the American Opportunity Credit or Lifetime Learning Credit. The "reimbursement" and "keeping scholarships" explanations don't make sense from a tax perspective. Scholarships are managed between you and your school, not through anyone's tax return. If she's talking about FAFSA, that's a completely separate financial aid process that doesn't require your 1098-T form. Here's what I'd recommend: File your taxes ASAP claiming yourself as independent and use your 1098-T to claim any education credits you're eligible for (like the American Opportunity Credit if you qualify). Once your return is processed, it will prevent anyone else from claiming those same benefits. Make sure you keep all documentation showing you paid qualified education expenses if you're claiming credits. And don't give her your 1098-T - there's no legitimate tax reason she needs it if she's not claiming you as a dependent.
This is solid advice! I'm in a similar situation where my parents were confused about who could claim what after I started filing independently. One thing to add - if your mom is still confused about the "reimbursement" she mentioned, it might help to explain that education tax credits are dollar-for-dollar reductions in tax owed, not actual reimbursements. The American Opportunity Credit can be up to $2,500 and is partially refundable, which might be what she's thinking of. But again, only you can claim it since you're filing independently and claiming yourself. Filing early is definitely the right move to lock in your claim to those credits!
I'm a tax professional and want to add some clarity about the specific situation you described with the 2021 income reporting. It sounds like your mom might be confusing several different tax concepts here. The mention of reporting your income as "below $6,700" in 2021 suggests she may have been trying to ensure you qualified as her dependent under the gross income test (which was $4,300 for 2021, actually). However, if you're now 22, living independently, and paying your own expenses, you likely don't meet the dependency tests regardless of income. The "keeping scholarships" comment is particularly concerning because it suggests a fundamental misunderstanding of how scholarships work. Scholarships are awarded and maintained based on academic performance, enrollment status, and the specific terms set by the scholarship provider - not by who claims what on their tax return. What your mom might actually be thinking about is maximizing education benefits across both your returns, but she's going about it the wrong way. If she has legitimate education-related expenses (like Parent PLUS loan interest), she can claim those deductions without needing your 1098-T. But the education credits associated with your 1098-T can only be claimed by whoever claims you as a dependent - which in this case would be you. My advice: Have a direct conversation with her about what specific tax benefit she thinks she's missing out on, then you can address the actual issue rather than this confusing 1098-T request.
This is really helpful context! The 2021 income reporting detail you mentioned makes me wonder if there's been an ongoing pattern of confusion about tax dependency rules. As someone new to this situation, I'm curious - if the mom has been incorrectly handling the dependency/education credit situation for multiple years, could that create problems down the road? And is there a way to correct previous years if mistakes were made, or should they just focus on getting this year right going forward?
I'm dealing with a similar situation right now and this thread has been incredibly informative! One aspect I haven't seen mentioned yet is the timing of when to make this change during the tax year. Since we're already partway through 2025, would it be better to wait and make the accounting method change effective for the 2026 tax year, or can we still implement it for 2025? I'm worried about mid-year complications with the Section 481(a) adjustment calculations. Also, for those who have made this switch - how do you handle the ongoing reconciliation between your accrual books and cash method tax returns? Do you maintain separate records or use some kind of worksheet to track the differences each year? I want to make sure we set up a sustainable system that won't create headaches down the road.
Great question about timing! You can absolutely make the accounting method change effective for 2025 even though we're partway through the year. The change is effective for the entire tax year, not from the date you file Form 3115. So if you file it with your 2025 return, the cash method applies to all of 2025. However, there's an important deadline to keep in mind - Form 3115 must be filed with your timely filed return (including extensions) for the year of change. So for a 2025 change, you'd need to file it with your 2025 S-Corp return by the due date. For the ongoing reconciliation between accrual books and cash tax returns, I set up a simple Excel worksheet that tracks the key differences each year: accounts receivable, accounts payable, prepaid expenses, and accrued liabilities. At year-end, I calculate the book-to-tax differences and use those to prepare the tax return. It's actually not as complicated as it sounds once you get the system set up. The key is being consistent with your tracking method so you don't accidentally double-count or miss items when preparing your returns. Most S-Corp tax software can handle the book-to-tax reconciliation once you input the differences.
Just wanted to add another perspective from someone who made this exact switch two years ago. One thing that really caught me off guard was how the change affected our quarterly estimated tax payments. Since we moved from accrual (where income was recognized when billed) to cash method (income recognized when received), our cash flow timing changed significantly. Under accrual, we had steady quarterly income recognition even if payments came in irregularly. With cash method, our taxable income now fluctuates based on when customers actually pay, which made estimated tax planning much trickier. We had one quarter where we received several large payments and owed way more than expected, followed by a quarter with very little taxable income. My advice: once you make the switch, work with your accountant to develop a new estimated tax payment strategy that accounts for your actual collection patterns rather than your billing schedule. This is especially important for service businesses with longer payment cycles. Also, make sure your payroll processing company understands the change if you're taking distributions or salary adjustments based on "book" income versus "tax" income. The disconnect between the two can create confusion when planning compensation.
This is such an important point that I wish someone had mentioned when I was considering this change! We're a consulting firm with Net-30 payment terms, and I can already see how this could create major cash flow planning issues. Quick question - did you end up adjusting your estimated tax payment schedule to be more frequent (like monthly instead of quarterly) to smooth out the volatility? Or did you just build larger cash reserves to handle the uneven quarters? Also, regarding the payroll/distribution planning - do you now base your owner distributions on cash tax income rather than book income to avoid getting caught short when tax bills come due? I'm trying to think through all these operational changes before we make the switch.
Has anyone considered using an HSA (Health Savings Account) in this situation? If your Blue Shield plan is HSA-eligible (high deductible health plan), you could put pre-tax money into an HSA up to $3,850 for individual coverage (2023 limit). This would give you some tax benefits without having to worry about the 7.5% threshold for itemizing. The money goes in pre-tax, grows tax-free, and comes out tax-free for qualified medical expenses. Would be a way to offset some of the tax impact from that stipend income at least!
I hadn't considered an HSA! My plan might qualify as high-deductible. Do you know if I can still open and fund an HSA for 2023 now in 2024, or is it too late? And would I set this up through my employer or on my own since the stipend situation is kind of unusual?
You can actually still open and contribute to an HSA for 2023 until the tax filing deadline (April 15, 2024). So you're not too late! Since your employer is giving you a stipend rather than offering an HSA-eligible plan directly, you would need to set up the HSA on your own through a bank or financial institution that offers them (Fidelity, Lively, and HealthEquity are popular options with low fees). You'll make the contributions yourself, then deduct them on your tax return. Just double-check that your Blue Shield plan is truly HSA-eligible. The plan must have a minimum deductible of $1,500 for individual coverage and a maximum out-of-pocket limit of $7,500 for 2023. The insurance company can confirm if your specific plan qualifies.
I'm dealing with a very similar situation at my workplace! We had the same transition from multiple insurance options to just one, and several of us opted for the stipend route to keep our existing providers. One thing I learned the hard way is to make sure you're setting aside enough for quarterly estimated tax payments if your employer isn't withholding enough from the stipend. Since it's treated as regular income, you might end up owing at tax time if the withholding doesn't account for the bump in income properly. Also, definitely explore that HSA option someone mentioned if your plan qualifies. I wish I had known about that earlier - it would have helped offset some of the tax burden from the stipend. The pre-tax savings can be significant, especially if you're in a higher tax bracket. Have you checked with your benefits department about whether they might consider setting up a formal HRA structure for next year? Sometimes HR departments are open to exploring these options once they realize how many employees are affected by the tax implications.
Just to add some practical advice - whether or not you form an LLC, definitely keep track of ALL your business expenses for your photography work. Gear, software, travel to shoots, portion of home used exclusively for business, etc. These are deductible regardless of how you're classified. If you are properly an independent contractor (which doesn't sound like the case here), you'd report these on Schedule C. If you're an employee, some expenses might be eligible as unreimbursed employee business expenses, though the tax benefits are more limited since the 2017 tax law changes. But the classification issue is the bigger concern. If you're being treated like an employee, you should be classified as one, LLC or not.
Thanks for the expense tracking advice! I've been pretty bad about keeping receipts for my photography gear purchases. Will employee classification affect how I can deduct my camera equipment? I spent about $3200 on a new camera body last year.
As an independent contractor, you could deduct the full cost of that $3200 camera on your Schedule C, either all at once using Section 179 expensing (if you qualify) or through depreciation over several years. This would directly reduce your self-employment income and the associated taxes. As an employee, unfortunately, the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act suspended the deduction for unreimbursed employee business expenses through 2025. This means you generally can't deduct that camera purchase on your taxes if you're classified as an employee unless your employer reimburses you through an accountable plan. This is actually one of the few tax advantages of being an independent contractor, though it rarely outweighs the higher self-employment taxes and loss of benefits that come with employee status.
One thing nobody's mentioned yet - if you do decide to form an LLC (for your legitimate freelance photography, separate from your employment situation), consider talking to an insurance agent about professional liability insurance. An LLC provides some protection, but having insurance is even better protection against potential lawsuits from unsatisfied clients. I learned this the hard way when a wedding client sued me after claiming I missed important moments. My LLC helped, but having insurance would have saved me thousands in legal fees even though I eventually won the case.
What kind of insurance would cover photography work specifically? Is it expensive? I've been doing weddings and portraits for 3 years with no business structure at all and now I'm worried...
Professional liability insurance for photographers typically covers errors and omissions, copyright infringement claims, and failure to deliver services as promised. General liability covers accidents at shoots (like if someone trips over your equipment). You can get both bundled - I pay about $400/year for $1M coverage through companies like Hill & Usher or TCP (The Coverage Professionals). Some even cover equipment theft/damage. Definitely worth it for wedding work especially - one lawsuit could cost way more than years of premiums!
GalacticGuru
I've heard that the EITC is different for each tax year because of inflation adjustments. Does anyone know what the threshold was for 2021? I'm trying to figure out if I should amend my return.
0 coins
Freya Pedersen
ā¢For 2021, the threshold for singles with no kids was usually $15,980, but there were special expanded rules because of COVID relief. The age range was 19-64 (instead of the usual 25-64) and I think the max income was around $21,430 for singles with no qualifying children. It was a one-time expansion just for 2021.
0 coins
GalacticGuru
ā¢Thanks for the info! I might have qualified under those expanded rules. Definitely going to look into amending my 2021 return now.
0 coins
Melina Haruko
Just wanted to add some context about why you might be behind on your taxes - the IRS has been dealing with massive processing delays, especially for amended returns. Your February 2022 amended return not getting processed until December 2022 is unfortunately pretty typical of what many people experienced during that period. For your current situation, as others have mentioned, you're just over the 2022 EITC threshold. But definitely keep those expanded 2021 rules in mind that @Freya Pedersen mentioned - if you were between 19-24 in 2021, you might have qualified under the special COVID provisions even if you didn't think you were eligible at the time. The income limits were much higher that year, so it's worth double-checking your 2021 situation. Also, make sure you're calculating your AGI correctly. Your AGI should generally be close to your earned income if you're just filing a basic return with W-2 income. If there's a big difference between your W-2 wages ($13,100) and your calculated AGI ($16,800), you might want to double-check that calculation or see if there are other income sources you forgot about.
0 coins