IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Emma Davis

•

Don't forget to call the IRS after sending important faxes to confirm they received them! I learned this the hard way when I faxed my offer in compromise docs and assumed they got them, only to find out 2 months later they had no record of receiving anything. Now I always follow up with a call about a week after sending anything critical.

0 coins

Tasia Synder

•

Great advice from everyone here! I'd also add that if you're sending time-sensitive documents like amended returns or payment agreements, consider sending them through multiple channels (fax AND certified mail) for extra security. I've had situations where the IRS received one but not the other, and having both methods gave me backup proof of timely filing. Also, always keep your fax confirmation receipts - I scan mine and save them digitally with my tax files. The IRS can be slow to update their systems, so even if they received your fax, it might not show up in their records for several weeks when you call to check. One more tip: if you're faxing forms that require signatures, make sure your signatures are dark and clear on the scanned document. Light or blurry signatures can cause processing delays.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

This is excellent advice! I'm dealing with my first amended return and was planning to just fax it, but sending through both channels makes so much sense for peace of mind. Quick question - when you send through both methods, do you need to include any special notation on the documents to indicate you're submitting via multiple channels? I don't want to accidentally create duplicate processing issues with the IRS.

0 coins

Oliver Brown

•

This is a frustrating situation that unfortunately happens more often than it should with small employers. The key issue here is that your employer likely doesn't have a formal Health Reimbursement Arrangement (HRA) in place, which is required for these reimbursements to be tax-free. Since you received a 1099-NEC, you'll need to report this as income on your tax return. However, there are a few things to consider: 1. You may be able to deduct the actual health insurance premiums you paid as a self-employed health insurance deduction (since this is being treated as self-employment income) 2. You might qualify for the premium tax credit if you purchased marketplace insurance 3. You'll unfortunately owe self-employment taxes (15.3%) on this amount in addition to regular income tax For your 2024 taxes, you can file an amended return (Form 1040-X) to include this income. Going forward, I'd strongly recommend talking to your employer about setting up a proper HRA or QSEHRA for future reimbursements to avoid this tax mess. The late timing of receiving the 1099-NEC in June is also concerning - they should have issued it by January 31st. Consider consulting with a tax professional to make sure you're handling this correctly and maximizing any available deductions or credits.

0 coins

Jamal Brown

•

This is really helpful advice! I'm in a similar situation and didn't realize about the self-employed health insurance deduction possibility. One question though - if I'm a regular W-2 employee at this company but they're treating these health reimbursements as 1099-NEC income, does that create any issues with having both types of income from the same employer? It seems weird to be both an employee and a contractor for the same company at the same time.

0 coins

Anita George

•

That's an excellent question and you're right to be concerned about this dual classification issue. Having both W-2 and 1099-NEC income from the same employer for the same tax year can definitely raise red flags with the IRS, especially if the work performed is essentially the same. The IRS has specific criteria for determining whether someone is an employee or independent contractor, and it's based on the actual work relationship, not just how the employer chooses to classify payments. If you're performing regular employee duties under the company's control and direction, those health reimbursements should probably be treated as additional W-2 wages, not 1099-NEC income. This misclassification could actually work in your favor though - if you can demonstrate that you should be classified as an employee for ALL services (including the health reimbursements), you might be able to file Form SS-8 with the IRS to request a worker classification determination. If they rule in your favor, you could potentially avoid the self-employment taxes on the health reimbursements. I'd definitely recommend discussing this with a tax professional who can review your specific employment arrangement. The dual classification issue might be grounds for challenging how your employer reported this income.

0 coins

Sofia Price

•

This is exactly why small employers need to be more careful about how they structure health benefits! I've seen this scenario play out so many times. The fundamental issue is that your employer is essentially giving you cash payments for health insurance without having a formal plan document in place. A few key points to consider: 1. **Timing Issues**: The fact that you received this 1099-NEC in June is problematic - these should be issued by January 31st. This late filing might indicate your employer wasn't properly tracking these payments as taxable income throughout the year. 2. **Self-Employment Tax Trap**: Since this is on a 1099-NEC, you'll owe both the employee and employer portions of Social Security/Medicare taxes (15.3% total), which is particularly painful since you're already a W-2 employee of the same company. 3. **Available Deductions**: The silver lining is that you should be able to claim the self-employed health insurance deduction for the premiums you actually paid, and you might also qualify for premium tax credits if you purchased marketplace coverage. 4. **Going Forward**: Your employer really should establish a proper Section 105 HRA or QSEHRA. It's not that expensive to set up and would save both of you significant tax liability in the future. For your immediate situation, you'll need to file an amended return to include this income. Given the complexity and the dual classification issue (W-2 employee receiving 1099-NEC from same employer), I'd strongly recommend consulting with a tax professional to ensure you're handling this correctly and not missing any potential deductions or credits.

0 coins

Isaac Wright

•

This is such a comprehensive breakdown, thank you! I'm dealing with a similar situation where my small employer has been reimbursing health insurance costs but clearly didn't set up any formal HRA. The self-employment tax aspect is what really stings - paying an extra 15.3% on top of regular income tax for what should have been a tax-free benefit if they'd just structured it properly. I'm curious about the timing issue you mentioned. If an employer issues a 1099-NEC late (like in June instead of January), does that create any penalty relief for the recipient? It seems unfair that we have to deal with the tax consequences of their poor planning and late reporting. Also, when you mention consulting a tax professional about the dual classification issue - is this something that could potentially be resolved in the taxpayer's favor even after the 1099-NEC has already been issued?

0 coins

Sara Unger

•

As someone who just joined this community, I've been reading through this entire discussion and I'm honestly grateful that so many experienced members took the time to share such detailed advice and real-world experiences. The unanimous consensus against misrepresenting 1098-T information is really telling - especially when it comes from people who've actually dealt with audit consequences or work in the field. What's been most valuable for me is learning about the automated matching systems the IRS uses specifically for education credits. I had no idea they could cross-reference what schools report against what students claim without manual review. The insight from @Zara Rashid about universities getting contacted directly when there are discrepancies really shows how interconnected these systems are. I'm particularly grateful for all the practical suggestions about legitimate expenses that often get overlooked - required software, lab equipment, mandatory fees not captured on the 1098-T, and course materials. It sounds like many students miss out on credits they're actually entitled to simply because they don't realize what qualifies beyond tuition. The personal stories about audit experiences and penalties really drive home that any short-term financial gain isn't worth the long-term stress and costs. After reading all this, I'm definitely going to take the conservative approach and carefully review what legitimate expenses I can claim rather than even considering questionable reporting. The peace of mind of filing correctly is clearly worth more than any risky shortcuts.

0 coins

Welcome to the community! I'm also relatively new here and this discussion has been incredibly eye-opening for me as well. As someone who's currently dealing with my own 1098-T situation, reading everyone's experiences has really helped me understand the serious risks involved with misrepresenting scholarship information. What really struck me was learning about how sophisticated the IRS matching systems have become. I had always assumed they were too overwhelmed to catch these kinds of discrepancies, but it's clear that education credits are specifically targeted by automated systems that don't require human intervention to detect problems. The practical advice about overlooked legitimate expenses has been invaluable. I'm definitely going to go back through my records to look for required software, lab fees, and course materials that I might have missed. It sounds like there are often legitimate deductions available that students don't even realize they can claim - which is so much better than risking the penalties that come with misreporting. The consensus here about prioritizing long-term peace of mind over short-term financial gain really resonates with me. After reading about the audit experiences and penalties other members have shared, it's clear that filing correctly is the only sensible approach. Thanks to everyone for creating such a supportive and informative community!

0 coins

StarStrider

•

As a new member of this community, I've been following this discussion with great interest since I'm facing a similar situation with my own 1098-T form. The overwhelming consensus here against misrepresenting scholarship information has really opened my eyes to how risky that approach would be. What's been most enlightening is learning about the IRS's automated matching systems specifically designed for education credits. I had no idea they could cross-reference what educational institutions report against what students claim without any manual review needed. The insight from those who work in financial aid about universities being contacted directly by the IRS when discrepancies are found really shows how thorough these systems are. I'm particularly grateful for all the practical advice about legitimate expenses that students often overlook. Reading about required software licenses, lab equipment, mandatory fees not included on the 1098-T, and course materials has made me realize I should carefully review my own educational expenses. It sounds like many of us leave money on the table simply because we don't know what actually qualifies for education credits. The personal experiences shared about audit consequences and penalties really drive home that no short-term financial relief is worth the potential long-term costs and stress. After absorbing all this wisdom from the community, I'm committed to taking the conservative approach - thoroughly documenting legitimate expenses while ensuring everything is reported accurately. The peace of mind that comes with filing correctly is clearly invaluable. Thanks to everyone for sharing such detailed and honest advice. This community is an incredible resource for navigating these complex tax situations safely and legally!

0 coins

Welcome to the community! As another newcomer, I've been incredibly impressed by the depth of knowledge and real-world experience shared in this thread. Your summary really captures everything I've learned from this discussion too. What struck me most was how the automated matching systems work - I had completely underestimated how sophisticated the IRS has become at detecting education credit discrepancies. The fact that it happens automatically without human intervention makes it clear that trying to misrepresent scholarship information is essentially guaranteed to get caught. I'm also planning to go back through my educational expenses after reading all these suggestions. The examples about required software, lab equipment, and fees not captured on the 1098-T have made me realize there might be legitimate deductions I've overlooked. It's so much better to find money you're actually entitled to rather than risk the penalties that come with misreporting. The stories about audit experiences shared here have really reinforced that filing correctly is the only smart approach. The stress and financial consequences people described would far outweigh any temporary benefit from inflating deductions. Thanks for such a thoughtful summary of this entire discussion!

0 coins

I'm a newcomer here but dealing with this exact same W4 confusion! Just started a new job this month and was completely lost when I couldn't find the allowances section anywhere on the form. This entire thread has been such a lifesaver - I had no idea the IRS eliminated the allowances system back in 2019. Reading everyone's real experiences and seeing the specific examples (like the $25-40 extra withholding amounts) has given me so much clarity on how to approach this. What really helped me understand was learning that claiming "0 allowances" on the old form was basically designed to over-withhold massively, creating those huge refunds that felt amazing but were essentially interest-free loans to the government. The new system's focus on accuracy makes so much more sense for us as taxpayers. I'm definitely using the IRS withholding estimator this weekend with my pay stub - the consistent recommendations here that it's reliable and only takes 15 minutes is exactly what I needed to hear. For someone who's always been nervous about owing money at tax time, having personalized guidance based on my actual situation sounds perfect. Thanks to everyone who shared their real numbers and step-by-step experiences - this community is incredible for helping newcomers navigate these government form changes! You've turned what seemed like an impossible task into something totally manageable.

0 coins

Justin Trejo

•

I'm a newcomer to this community and going through the exact same W4 situation right now! Just started a new job last week and was totally bewildered when I couldn't find the allowances section that I've been using for my entire working career. This thread has been absolutely incredible - I had no idea that the IRS completely overhauled the withholding system in 2019. Reading through everyone's detailed experiences and seeing the specific numbers people shared (like adding $25-40 in Step 4c for extra withholding) has made this whole transition so much clearer. What really helped me understand the reasoning was learning that the old "0 allowances" approach was essentially a blunt instrument that resulted in massive over-withholding - those big refunds we all loved were actually just our own money being held by the government without earning any interest. The new system's focus on precision and getting withholding closer to actual tax liability makes perfect sense from a taxpayer perspective. Based on all the excellent advice here, I'm planning to use the IRS withholding estimator this weekend with my most recent pay stub. The overwhelming consensus that it's reliable, provides personalized recommendations, and only takes about 15 minutes is exactly the reassurance I needed. As someone who's always been anxious about owing money at tax time, having that level of customized guidance for my specific situation sounds ideal. Thank you to everyone who took the time to share their real experiences, actual dollar amounts, and step-by-step processes - this community is amazing for helping people navigate these confusing government changes! You've all transformed what felt like an overwhelming puzzle into a completely manageable weekend project.

0 coins

Don't forget when you file your taxes with a missing or reconstructed cost basis, you need to check the appropriate box on Form 8949. There's literally a checkbox for "Adjustment code B" which is for when the cost basis wasn't reported to the IRS. Then attach your basis calculation to your return. Without proper documentation, the IRS might assume your basis is $0 and tax you on the entire proceeds!

0 coins

Quick question - does anyone know if TurboTax handles this checkbox correctly? When I entered a transaction with missing basis last year, I couldn't figure out if it was properly marking it on the form.

0 coins

I've been through this exact scenario with inherited stock from the 1980s. Here's what worked for me after getting completely overwhelmed by all the corporate actions: First, don't panic about getting it "perfect" - the IRS understands that reconstructing basis from decades ago is challenging. The key is making a reasonable, documented effort. Start with your $1,100 original investment and work chronologically through each corporate action. For each stock split, divide your per-share basis accordingly. For the acquisitions, you'll need to find the exchange ratios (usually available in SEC filings or company investor relations). The spinoff is trickiest - you'll need the basis allocation percentage between the parent and spun-off company. Pro tip: Call the current company's shareholder services department. They often have detailed historical information specifically for tax basis calculations, including basis allocation percentages for spinoffs. I was surprised how helpful they were. Document everything you find and your calculation method. Attach this to your return along with Form 8949 using the appropriate adjustment code. Even if your numbers aren't perfect, showing good faith effort with documentation will protect you if the IRS has questions. The worst thing you can do is just guess randomly or report zero basis - that guarantees problems later!

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful, thank you! I'm dealing with a similar situation but with some old telecom stock that went through multiple mergers. Quick question - when you say "exchange ratios" for acquisitions, where exactly do I find those in SEC filings? Is there a specific form number I should be looking for, or do I just search through all the 8-Ks and 10-Ks from that time period? I'm worried I'll miss something important in all those documents.

0 coins

Prev1...11381139114011411142...5644Next