IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Just wanted to add another data point for anyone reading this thread - I've been filing from Singapore for 5 years now and can confirm that foreign wages definitely go on Line 1a. One thing I learned the hard way is to make sure you're using the correct exchange rates when converting SGD to USD. The IRS requires you to use the Treasury Department's yearly average exchange rates (available on their website) rather than spot rates or your bank's conversion rates. This can make a meaningful difference in your reported income amount. Also, since you mentioned you're using tax software, double-check that it's properly handling the Singapore tax year vs US tax year difference. Singapore's tax year runs from January to December, but make sure you're reporting the right period's income on your US return. I made this mistake my first year and had to file an amended return. The Foreign Earned Income Exclusion should cover your full $58k income assuming you meet the physical presence test (330 days in Singapore during any 12-month period). Keep a simple spreadsheet tracking your days in/out of Singapore - it'll save you headaches later if the IRS ever asks for documentation.

0 coins

LunarLegend

β€’

This is incredibly helpful, especially the point about using Treasury Department exchange rates! I had no idea there was a specific requirement for which rates to use. I've been using whatever rate my bank showed me when I converted money, which could definitely be causing issues. Quick question about the spreadsheet tracking - do you just track the actual dates you're in/out of Singapore, or do you also note the reasons for travel? I'm planning a few trips back to the US this year to visit family and want to make sure I'm documenting everything properly for the physical presence test. Also, when you mention the Singapore vs US tax year difference, are you referring to making sure the income reported aligns with the US calendar year (Jan-Dec) even though that might span across different Singapore tax periods? Want to make sure I understand this correctly before I file.

0 coins

@LunarLegend For the spreadsheet tracking, I just keep it simple - date in, date out, and destination/origin. You don't need to document reasons for travel for IRS purposes, but I do include a brief note (like "family visit" or "business trip") just for my own records. The IRS only cares about the actual days you were physically present in a foreign country. Regarding the tax year alignment - yes, exactly! You need to report income that corresponds to the US tax year (January 1 to December 31) on your US return, regardless of when Singapore's tax year runs or when you received certain payments. So for your 2024 US tax return, you'd report all income earned from January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024, even if some of that spans different Singapore tax periods. One more tip: the Treasury exchange rates are published annually, usually around March/April for the previous year. Until then, you can use the Federal Reserve's daily rates, but switch to the Treasury annual average once it's available. Makes everything much cleaner and more defensible if questioned.

0 coins

Just want to echo what everyone else has said - your Singapore wages definitely belong on Line 1a of Form 1040, not Line 1h. I went through this exact same confusion when I first moved to Hong Kong for work. One thing that might help clarify the logic: Line 1a is for ALL wages and salaries, regardless of the source country. Line 1h is specifically for miscellaneous income that doesn't fit into any of the other defined categories on the form (like gambling winnings, jury duty pay, etc.). Your regular employment income from Singapore is still wages, just foreign wages. The fact that you'll be excluding it later with Form 2555 doesn't change where you initially report it. Think of it as a two-step process: first you report ALL your worldwide income in the appropriate sections, then you apply exclusions and credits to reduce your taxable amount. Since you're earning about $58k USD equivalent and have been in Singapore for 3 years, you should easily qualify for the full Foreign Earned Income Exclusion (assuming you meet the physical presence test). Just make sure your tax software is set up to handle foreign income properly - most major programs have specific workflows for expats that will walk you through both the initial reporting and the exclusion forms.

0 coins

This is such a helpful thread! As someone who just moved to Singapore last month for work, I'm already dreading next year's tax season. It's reassuring to see that so many people have successfully navigated this process. One question I have - since I'll only be in Singapore for part of 2025 (started in December 2024), do I need to prorate anything for the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion, or does it work differently when you're not abroad for the full tax year? I'm assuming I'll still report all my income on Line 1a regardless, but wondering about the exclusion calculation for a partial year abroad. Also, @QuantumQuester, when you mention making sure tax software is set up properly for foreign income - are there specific settings or flags I should look for? I want to make sure I don't accidentally mess something up in the setup process.

0 coins

What happens by default in a blank married W4 form for tax withholding?

So I'm getting married this fall and trying to figure out tax withholding ahead of time. Single W4 makes sense to me - they take the standard deduction from your income and withhold at a rate that works out. But I'm confused about how it works for Married Filing Jointly. We plan to take the standard deduction, and I tried filling out the Multiple Jobs Worksheet based on our expected incomes, but the recommendations seem weird to me. For context, my fiancΓ©e earns about $85k and currently has around $270 withheld per paycheck, typically getting back $500 at tax time. I'll be making roughly $230k with approximately $650 withheld per paycheck (I'm in sales, so it's irregular with commissions that get hit with the flat 22% withholding), and I usually end up owing around $300. What exactly happens if we both just submit blank W4s with MFJ selected? Does the system apply the full $32,300 standard deduction to each of us? Split it between us? When I did the worksheet calculations, it suggested I should leave her W4 blank but add like $500 extra withholding to each of my paychecks, which seems excessive. I'm trying to keep our tax burden similar to what it is now, maybe even reduce mine since I can shelter more income. Could we do something like both select MFJ but have her add $60 extra withholding and me add $300? The tax calculator estimates we'll owe around $36k jointly next year based on my projections and pre-tax deductions.

Diego Mendoza

β€’

The withholding system for married couples is definitely counterintuitive! I'm a tax professional and see this confusion constantly with newly married clients. When you both select MFJ on blank W4s, each employer essentially assumes that job represents your total household income and applies the married filing jointly tax brackets and standard deduction accordingly. This works fine when spouses have similar incomes, but with your $230k vs $85k situation, you'll be severely underwithheld. Here's a practical approach: Start with 75% of what the Multiple Jobs Worksheet recommends. So instead of $500 extra per check for you, try $375. Have your fiancΓ©e add about $75 extra per check. This splits the adjustment more evenly while still addressing the mathematical reality that more of your combined income will be taxed at higher brackets. The key insight is that your $315k combined income pushes you well into the 24% and potentially 32% tax brackets, but each employer is withholding as if you're in much lower brackets based on individual incomes. I'd also recommend running the numbers again in June once you have actual married paystub data - commission income makes it harder to predict, and you can fine-tune from there. The goal is to get within $1,000 of your actual tax liability, not necessarily to be perfect.

0 coins

Ella Russell

β€’

This is exactly the kind of professional insight I was hoping for! The 75% approach seems like a smart middle ground - starting with $375 extra for me and $75 for my fiancΓ©e feels much more reasonable than the full worksheet amount. I really appreciate the explanation about how each employer treats the income. It makes so much more sense now why the default withholding fails so badly with income disparities. The idea that each payroll system thinks it's dealing with our total household income explains why we'd be so underwithheld. One follow-up question: you mentioned getting within $1,000 of actual tax liability as the goal. Is that $1,000 in either direction, or specifically trying to avoid owing more than $1,000? I know there are penalty rules around underwithholding, so I'm wondering if it's safer to err on the side of slight overwithholding rather than risk owing a large amount. Also, when you say to recheck in June with actual married paystub data - are you referring to seeing how the withholding actually plays out in practice, or waiting until we're actually married and filing status changes take effect?

0 coins

Kendrick Webb

β€’

Great question about the $1,000 target! I meant $1,000 in either direction, but you're absolutely right to think about the penalty implications. The IRS safe harbor rules mean you won't face penalties if you either: (1) owe less than $1,000 at filing, or (2) withhold at least 100% of last year's tax (110% if your prior year AGI exceeded $150k). Given your income levels, you'll likely hit that 110% threshold, so I'd actually recommend erring slightly toward overwithholding rather than risk penalties. Better to get a refund than deal with estimated tax payment requirements. Regarding the June check - I meant after you're actually married and the new withholding has been in effect for a few months. You'll want to see how the adjusted withholding amounts are working in practice, especially with your commission variations. Sometimes the real-world numbers don't match the projections perfectly, particularly when one spouse has irregular income like yours. Plus, you'll have a better sense of your actual annual income by mid-year rather than just estimates.

0 coins

I went through this exact situation when I got married three years ago, and it was honestly one of the most confusing aspects of combining finances! The default MFJ withholding is basically broken for couples with significant income differences. Here's what I learned the hard way: when you both submit blank MFJ W4s, each employer calculates withholding as if that single job represents your entire household's income. So your employer treats your $230k as if it's the total household income and withholds accordingly, while her employer treats her $85k the same way. The problem is that your combined $315k income actually pushes you into much higher tax brackets than either employer realizes. In our case (similar income split to yours), we ended up owing almost $8,000 when we filed jointly the first year because we just assumed the system would figure it out. It was a painful lesson! For your situation, I'd recommend starting with about 70-80% of what the Multiple Jobs Worksheet suggests - so maybe $350-400 extra per check for you instead of the full $500, and have your fiancΓ©e add around $50-75. This approach worked well for us and felt more psychologically balanced. The key is that you can always adjust mid-year once you see how it's working out. Don't stress about getting it perfect immediately - most people need to tweak their withholding at least once after major life changes like marriage.

0 coins

Isabella Santos

β€’

Wow, $8,000 owed is exactly the kind of surprise I'm trying to avoid! Thank you for sharing your experience - it really drives home why I can't just assume the system will work itself out. The 70-80% approach you're suggesting seems to be a consistent theme in these responses, and it makes sense as a conservative starting point. I think I'll go with $375 extra for me and $75 for my fiancΓ©e as a starting point after we get married. One thing I'm curious about - you mentioned adjusting mid-year once you see how it's working out. How did you track whether you were on target? Did you just estimate your total tax liability and compare it to your year-to-date withholding, or did you use any specific tools or methods to stay on track? Also, after that first year surprise, how has your withholding strategy evolved? Do you still use the worksheet approach, or have you found other methods that work better for your situation?

0 coins

Caden Turner

β€’

After that expensive first-year lesson, I developed a pretty systematic approach to tracking our withholding throughout the year. I created a simple spreadsheet that I update quarterly with our year-to-date withholding from both paystubs, then project our total annual withholding based on remaining pay periods. I compare that to an estimated tax liability using the previous year's return as a baseline, adjusting for any major income changes. The key insight I learned is to use the IRS safe harbor rule as my floor - I make sure we're withholding at least 110% of the prior year's tax liability (since our AGI exceeds $150k) to avoid any penalties, even if my projections are off. As for strategy evolution, I actually moved away from the strict worksheet approach after year two. Now I use a "set it and forget it" method where I withhold about 25% of our gross income between both paychecks (factoring in pre-tax deductions). This tends to result in a small refund of $1,000-2,000, which I prefer over the stress of trying to get it perfect and risking another large tax bill. The peace of mind is worth the slight over-withholding to me. For someone just starting out like you, though, I'd definitely recommend the worksheet approach initially to understand how the numbers work, then you can adjust your strategy once you get comfortable with the system.

0 coins

Andre Dupont

β€’

One more thing to consider - if your wife becomes a US citizen, she won't need to fill out W-8BEN forms anymore. I was in the exact same situation (green card holder from Korea) and kept getting these forms. After I became a citizen, I just had to inform all my banks and provide proof of citizenship, and they stopped sending them. Might be something to think about if she's planning to apply for citizenship anyway. Saves a lot of paperwork hassle over time!

0 coins

QuantumQuasar

β€’

How long did it take for your bank to update their systems after you became a citizen? My husband just got his citizenship last month and we're wondering when all this paperwork will stop coming.

0 coins

Andre Dupont

β€’

It varied by bank. For my main bank where I have checking/savings, I went in person with my naturalization certificate and they updated it immediately - no more forms after that. For an online bank, I had to scan and email my certificate, and it took about 3 weeks for them to process it. One credit union kept sending forms for almost 6 months until I called them to follow up! I recommend being proactive - don't just wait for them to stop sending forms. Contact each financial institution where your husband has accounts and ask about their specific process for updating citizenship status. Some might want a W-9 form rather than the W-8BEN going forward.

0 coins

PixelPioneer

β€’

This is such a common situation! I went through the exact same thing with my wife who's from the Philippines (green card holder). We ignored those W-8BEN forms for ages too and felt terrible about it. Here's what I learned: The form is basically your wife telling the bank "I'm not a US citizen, but I live here and pay US taxes, so don't withhold the full 30% from my interest." Without it, the bank might start taking that 30% and sending it to the IRS as backup withholding. The good news is it's not too late to fix this! Your wife should fill out the form indicating she's a US tax resident (even though she's not a citizen). Since she has a green card and files US taxes, she qualifies for this status. Make sure she claims any treaty benefits between the US and Japan if applicable - this could reduce withholding even further. Don't stress too much about the delay. With the tiny interest rates we've all been getting, you probably haven't lost much money even if they were withholding. Just get it sorted now before interest rates go up more!

0 coins

Jacinda Yu

β€’

This is really reassuring to hear from someone who went through the same thing! Quick question - when your wife filled out the form as a "US tax resident," did she need any special documentation beyond her green card? And did you have to provide anything as the US citizen spouse, or was it really just her information that mattered? I'm also curious about those treaty benefits you mentioned between the US and Japan. Is that something that's automatically applied, or do you have to specifically request it on the form? We definitely don't want to miss out on any benefits we're entitled to!

0 coins

What about logo placement? If Sunrise Bakery gets their logo on uniforms or banners, wouldn't that make it an advertising expense rather than a donation anyway?

0 coins

Great point! If the bakery receives substantial recognition or advertising benefits in return for their payment, the IRS may consider it a business expense rather than a charitable contribution. Under qualified sponsorship rules, if the business gets only "token" recognition (like a simple "thanks to our sponsors" listing), the payment can still be considered a charitable contribution. But if they receive substantial benefits like prominent logo placement, banners, ads in programs, etc., then the fair market value of that advertising should be subtracted from the contribution amount.

0 coins

As a tax professional, I want to emphasize something crucial that hasn't been fully addressed yet: the IRS looks at the *substance* of the transaction, not just the form. Even if you restructure the sponsorship now to benefit all players equally (which is the right approach), the IRS could still scrutinize the original arrangement if audited. The fact that your son specifically approached the bakery for sponsorship creates a potential "quid pro quo" situation that could raise red flags. For future reference, the cleanest approach is what Oliver mentioned - have the organization solicit sponsorships directly, not through individual parents. This removes any appearance that the business is receiving a specific benefit (their employee's child getting financial assistance). That said, restructuring now is still your best option. Just make sure all documentation clearly shows the revised arrangement benefits the entire team, and consider having the team treasurer (not you as the parent) communicate with the bakery about the change to maintain arm's length treatment.

0 coins

Isaac Wright

β€’

This is really helpful advice, thank you! I'm new to this whole youth sports sponsorship thing and honestly had no idea about the "quid pro quo" implications when my son first approached the bakery. Given that the arrangement has already been made this way, would it be better to have our team treasurer reach out to the bakery to discuss restructuring, or should I be the one to bring it up since I was the original contact? I want to make sure we handle this correctly and don't create any additional complications. Also, is there a specific way the documentation should be worded to clearly show the benefit goes to the entire organization rather than individuals?

0 coins

I went through almost exactly this situation two years ago with my sister when we inherited a duplex. We made the same mistake - I was reporting 100% of the rental income even though we were both on the deed as equal owners. Here's what actually happened when we fixed it: My sister ended up owing some back taxes since she hadn't been reporting her 50% share, but I got refunds for the years I had been overpaying. The net effect across both of us was roughly balanced, though there were some differences due to our different tax brackets. The key thing our CPA emphasized was timing. We filed all the amended returns simultaneously - both my corrections showing reduced income and her corrections showing the previously unreported income. This helped demonstrate to the IRS that we were correcting an honest mistake rather than trying to game the system. Regarding the LLC question - our tax professional recommended getting compliant first with the partnership approach, then considering the LLC later. The partnership filing (Form 1065 + K-1s) gets you legally compliant immediately without the complexity of forming a new entity. You can always convert to an LLC structure later once everything is straightened out. One practical tip: Make sure you have clear records of all property expenses for the years you're amending. Since you've been keeping everything in that shared account, you should have good documentation, but organize it by tax year before meeting with your tax professional. It'll save you time and money.

0 coins

Lucy Lam

β€’

This is really reassuring to hear from someone who actually went through the process! The timing strategy of filing all amended returns simultaneously makes a lot of sense - it clearly shows you're fixing a mistake rather than hiding anything. Did you face any challenges with the IRS accepting that the income had been reported, just incorrectly allocated? I'm worried they might question why we waited so long to correct this, especially since we inherited the property back in 2021. Also, roughly how long did the whole amendment process take from start to finish? The advice about organizing expenses by tax year is gold - our shared account has everything mixed together, so I'll definitely need to sort through four years of transactions before meeting with a tax professional.

0 coins

Avery Davis

β€’

I'm dealing with a very similar situation right now! My brother and I co-own a rental property that we inherited, but only he's been reporting the income. After reading through all these responses, I'm convinced we need to get this fixed ASAP. The point about the IRS treating co-owned rental properties as partnerships by default is something I didn't know. I always thought you had to formally register a partnership, but apparently just owning property together for profit automatically creates one for tax purposes. I'm particularly interested in the experiences shared about amended returns. It sounds like as long as you're proactive about fixing it and can show the total income was being reported (just incorrectly), the IRS is generally reasonable. The strategy of filing all amendments simultaneously to show it's a correction rather than tax avoidance makes perfect sense. One thing I'm still unclear on - when you file as a partnership with Form 1065, does the property itself need an EIN (Employer Identification Number)? Or can you file the partnership return using one of the owner's SSNs? This might be a basic question, but I want to make sure I understand all the steps involved before I start this process.

0 coins

Ryder Ross

β€’

Yes, you'll need to get an EIN for the partnership when you file Form 1065. The IRS requires partnerships to have their own tax identification number - you can't use an individual's SSN for the partnership return. The good news is that getting an EIN is free and can be done online at the IRS website (irs.gov) in just a few minutes. When you apply for the EIN, you'll select "Partnership" as the entity type and list the property address as the business location. Make sure to keep the EIN confirmation letter - you'll need that number for all future partnership filings. Also, just to clarify something from earlier in the thread - each partner will report their share of the partnership income/loss on their individual tax returns using Schedule E (Rental Real Estate), not just the distributed cash. So even in years where you kept profits in the shared account rather than distributing them, each owner should still report their allocated share of the net income on their personal returns. This is called "pass-through" taxation - the partnership doesn't pay taxes itself, but passes the tax liability through to the individual partners.

0 coins

Prev1...11401141114211431144...5643Next