IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I went through this exact same process last year with my SPX options and futures trading! The confusion is totally understandable - TurboTax's interface for 1256 contracts isn't very intuitive. Here's what worked for me: After searching for "Form 6781" and selecting "Yes" for having 1256 contracts, the key is to use the summary amounts from your 1099-B rather than trying to enter individual trades. Your broker should have a specific section for 1256 contracts that shows your total gains/losses. One thing that tripped me up initially was making sure I didn't double-enter these amounts in both the regular capital gains section AND Form 6781. The 1256 contracts should ONLY go in Form 6781, not in the regular stock trading sections. With $14,500 in realized profits, you'll benefit from that 60/40 split (60% long-term, 40% short-term) regardless of how long you held the positions. TurboTax will calculate this automatically once you enter your totals correctly. The "marked to market" question should be "No" unless you've made a special trader election with the IRS, which most retail traders haven't done.

0 coins

This is really helpful, thank you! I'm new to trading these types of contracts and was getting overwhelmed by all the different forms and rules. One quick follow-up question - when you say "summary amounts from your 1099-B," should I be looking for a specific box number or section? My 1099-B has a lot of different sections and I want to make sure I'm pulling the right numbers for Form 6781. Also, does it matter if some of my SPX trades were spreads (like iron condors) versus single options, or do they all get treated the same way for 1256 purposes?

0 coins

StormChaser

•

Great question about the 1099-B sections! You'll want to look for a section specifically labeled something like "Section 1256 Contracts" or "Regulated Futures Contracts" - it's usually in a separate section from your regular stock trades. Some brokers put it at the bottom of the 1099-B or on a supplemental page. If you can't find a dedicated section, look for trades that are specifically marked as "1256" in the description. For your SPX spreads like iron condors, they absolutely get the same 1256 treatment as single options! The IRS doesn't differentiate between simple and complex strategies when it comes to Section 1256 contracts. Each leg of your iron condor that involves SPX options will be treated as a 1256 contract. Your broker should have already calculated the net profit/loss from all the legs combined, so you just need the total amounts. One tip: if your broker didn't break out 1256 contracts clearly, you can manually identify them by looking for trades with underlying symbols like SPX, VIX, RUT, or any futures contracts. These all qualify for 1256 treatment regardless of the strategy complexity.

0 coins

I just went through this exact situation a few months ago when filing my taxes for last year's SPX options trading. The Form 6781 process in TurboTax definitely isn't as straightforward as it should be! One thing that really helped me was double-checking my broker's classification of the trades. I found that my broker had actually missed categorizing a few of my SPX trades as 1256 contracts on the initial 1099-B, but they issued a corrected version later. You might want to verify that all your SPX options and futures are properly marked as Section 1256 contracts on your forms. Also, keep in mind that if you have any wash sale adjustments related to your 1256 contracts, those will need special handling since the wash sale rules work differently for Section 1256 contracts compared to regular securities. The good news is that once you get past the initial confusion, the 60/40 tax treatment actually works out pretty favorably compared to short-term capital gains rates on regular trades. With your $14,500 profit, you'll definitely benefit from having 60% of that treated as long-term gains. If you run into any snags with the TurboTax interface, don't hesitate to reach out - this community has been really helpful for navigating these more complex trading tax situations!

0 coins

Thanks for mentioning the wash sale adjustments - that's something I hadn't considered! I did have some losing positions that I closed and then reopened similar positions within 30 days. How exactly do wash sales work differently for 1256 contracts? Do I need to make manual adjustments in TurboTax, or does the software handle it automatically when I enter the corrected basis amounts from my 1099-B? Also, you mentioned checking for corrected 1099-B forms - my broker did issue a supplemental statement a few weeks after the original. Should I be combining both forms when entering the totals into Form 6781, or does the supplemental replace the original entirely?

0 coins

Ravi Patel

•

This thread has been incredibly informative! As someone who just joined this community and is facing a very similar situation with our first remote intern, I want to thank everyone for sharing their experiences and resources. Based on all the advice here, it's clear that the W-2 classification is the right path for situations like the original post describes. The combination of set hours, training provision, and working on core business projects really does point toward employee status regardless of the remote or temporary nature. I'm particularly grateful for the practical recommendations about Gusto for multi-state payroll and the detailed documentation checklist from @Isabella Costa. The cost breakdown showing $50-60 total for a short-term engagement through Gusto seems very reasonable compared to the complexity of trying to handle multi-state compliance manually. One thing I'm curious about that hasn't been fully addressed - for those who have gone through this process, how far in advance do you typically start the payroll setup? We're looking at bringing on an intern in about 3 weeks, and I want to make sure I allow enough time for all the state registrations and tax account setups to be processed before their start date. Also, has anyone run into situations where the intern's state had particularly unusual requirements that caught you off guard? I want to be prepared for any surprises beyond the standard tax withholding and unemployment insurance setup. Thanks again to everyone for making this such a helpful discussion for newcomers like me!

0 coins

Welcome to the community, @Ravi Patel! You're asking great questions about timing - I'd definitely recommend starting the payroll setup process at least 2-3 weeks before your intern's start date, maybe even a month if you can. Some states can take 7-10 business days just to process employer registration applications, and you don't want to be scrambling at the last minute. As for unusual state requirements, I ran into a few surprises when I went through this process. Colorado has some unique pay transparency requirements even for temporary workers, and California has very specific meal break rules that apply even to remote workers if your business is based there. New York requires you to provide written notice about wage theft prevention even for short-term employees. The biggest surprise for me was that some states require you to carry workers' compensation insurance even for a single remote employee, and getting that coverage set up can take time. I'd suggest calling the state's department of labor where your intern will be working and asking specifically about requirements for remote workers - it's better to over-prepare than miss something important. One more tip: if you're using a service like Gusto, they often have state-specific setup guides that highlight the unusual requirements. Definitely take advantage of their customer support to walk through your specific situation before you get started!

0 coins

As a newcomer to this community, I have to say this thread has been incredibly eye-opening! I'm a small business owner who's been considering bringing on remote interns, and honestly, I had no idea about the complexity involved in multi-state compliance. The consensus here is crystal clear - the situation described by @Amara Okafor definitely requires W-2 classification. Set hours, training, and direct supervision are textbook employee indicators regardless of location or duration. What's really valuable is seeing the practical solutions everyone has shared. The Gusto recommendation with real cost breakdowns ($50-60 for a short engagement) makes this feel much more manageable than I initially thought. I was dreading the idea of navigating multiple state tax systems, but it sounds like modern payroll services handle most of the complexity. @Giovanni Colombo's point about starting 2-3 weeks early is noted! I'm definitely not waiting until the last minute after reading about potential delays in state registrations. One follow-up question for the group: has anyone dealt with interns who might be international students on F-1 visas? I'm wondering if that adds another layer of complexity to the W-2 vs 1099 decision, or if the same control factors apply regardless of visa status. Thanks to everyone for sharing their real-world experiences - this is exactly the kind of practical advice that makes this community so valuable!

0 coins

Great question about F-1 visa students, @Abigail bergen! This actually adds some important considerations but doesn't change the fundamental W-2 vs 1099 analysis. F-1 students are still subject to the same IRS control test - if you're providing training, setting hours, and directing how work gets done, they're employees regardless of visa status. However, there are some specific tax implications for international students on F-1 visas that you should be aware of: 1. **Social Security/Medicare taxes**: F-1 students are generally exempt from FICA taxes (Social Security and Medicare) for their first 5 calendar years in the US, but this only applies to on-campus work or approved off-campus employment like OPT/CPT. 2. **Tax treaty benefits**: Depending on their country of origin, they might be eligible for tax treaty benefits that could affect withholding rates. 3. **Work authorization**: Make sure the internship falls under their authorized employment (CPT for curricular training or OPT for optional practical training). Working without proper authorization can jeopardize their visa status. 4. **State tax complexity**: Some states have different rules for nonresident aliens, which could affect your withholding requirements. I'd strongly recommend consulting with an immigration attorney or international student services office to ensure the internship structure complies with F-1 regulations. The payroll services like Gusto can handle the tax withholding nuances, but the work authorization piece is critical to get right upfront. The documentation requirements @Isabella Costa mentioned become even more important with international students - you ll'want clear records showing this is legitimate educational training!

0 coins

This has been such an informative thread! I'm in a similar situation with my freelance graphic design LLC and was making the same mistake of thinking I could somehow bypass taxation by contributing directly from my business account. Just to summarize what I've learned here for anyone else reading: You MUST pay yourself from the LLC first, pay taxes on that income, and then use the after-tax dollars for Roth contributions. There's no way around this - the IRS requires Roth contributions to come from properly reported earned income. The Solo 401(k) with Roth option sounds like the best path forward for those of us with LLCs making decent income. Being able to contribute up to $23,500 in Roth money (plus potentially more in traditional contributions) versus just $7,000 with a regular Roth IRA is a huge difference for retirement planning. One question I still have - if I set up a Solo 401(k), can I still contribute to my existing Roth IRA in the same year, or do I have to choose one or the other? I've had my Roth IRA for about 8 years and would hate to lose that 5-year clock if possible.

0 coins

Simon White

•

Great summary! And yes, you can absolutely contribute to both a Solo 401(k) and your existing Roth IRA in the same year - they have separate contribution limits that don't interfere with each other. So you could potentially do the full $7,000 to your Roth IRA AND up to $23,500 in Roth contributions to a Solo 401(k), assuming you have enough earned income to support both. You definitely don't want to lose that 8-year clock on your existing Roth IRA! That's a valuable head start on the 5-year rule. Keep that account active and consider it part of your overall retirement strategy alongside the Solo 401(k). The key is just making sure your total contributions don't exceed your actual earned income for the year. So if your LLC generates $50k in net earnings after expenses, that's your ceiling for all retirement contributions combined. But within that limit, you can split between different account types as long as you stay within each account's individual limits.

0 coins

Aisha Khan

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm a tax attorney who works with a lot of small business owners, and I wanted to add a couple of important points that might save people some headaches: First, regarding the S-Corp election discussion - there's a "reasonable salary" requirement that the IRS takes seriously. If you elect S-Corp status, you MUST pay yourself a reasonable W-2 salary for the work you perform, even if it means higher payroll taxes. You can't just pay yourself $20k salary and take $70k in distributions to avoid payroll taxes. The IRS has been cracking down on this, and penalties can be severe. Second, for those considering Solo 401(k)s, remember that if you ever hire employees (even part-time), you'll generally need to include them in the plan, which can get expensive and complicated. A SEP-IRA might be a better choice if you think you'll expand your team. Finally, I'd strongly recommend working with a qualified tax professional before making major changes to your business structure or retirement strategy. The tax code is complex, and what works for one person's situation might create problems for another. The services mentioned in this thread (like taxr.ai) might be helpful for analysis, but they shouldn't replace professional advice for significant decisions. Great discussion overall - it's refreshing to see people taking retirement planning seriously!

0 coins

Madison King

•

Thank you so much for the professional perspective! As someone who's just starting to navigate this LLC/retirement planning maze, the point about reasonable salary for S-Corp election is really important. I keep seeing advice to minimize salary to save on payroll taxes, but it sounds like the IRS is watching for that. Can you give a rough sense of what "reasonable" means in practice? Like if my LLC brings in $90k in consulting income, what salary range would typically be considered reasonable vs. what might trigger scrutiny? I'm trying to understand if the S-Corp election even makes sense for someone at my income level or if I should stick with the default sole proprietorship treatment. Also, the employee inclusion requirement for Solo 401(k)s is something I hadn't considered. I might want to hire a part-time assistant eventually, so maybe SEP-IRA is the safer long-term choice? Thanks for keeping us grounded in the real-world compliance issues!

0 coins

Ashley Adams

•

Watch out with amended returns and negative AGI situations! I tried to DIY this myself last year and ended up getting a notice from the IRS because I incorrectly tried to carry forward my entire negative AGI (which included FEIE). The IRS ended up disallowing my claimed carryforward and assessing additional tax plus interest. Make sure you're only carrying forward components that actually qualify - like business losses, not just the negative AGI that resulted from exclusions like FEIE.

0 coins

Did you end up getting hit with any penalties? I'm in a similar situation now and trying to figure out if I should just hire a pro to handle the amendments.

0 coins

Ryan Young

•

Just to add another perspective here - I went through something very similar with my 2021 and 2022 returns. Had a negative AGI in 2021 due to a combination of FEIE and some business losses from freelance work that dried up during COVID. The key thing I learned (after initially getting it wrong) is that you really need to break down what specifically created that negative AGI. In my case, about $18k of the negative was from legitimate business losses that could be carried forward as an NOL, but the rest was from the FEIE which doesn't create a carryover opportunity. I ended up having to file Form 1045 to properly calculate the NOL portion and then amended my following year's return to claim it correctly. The business loss carryforward definitely helped offset some of my 2022 income, but it was way less than I initially thought I could carry forward. If you're dealing with multiple components creating the negative AGI like I was, I'd strongly recommend getting professional help or at least double-checking your work before filing the amendments. The IRS doesn't mess around with incorrectly claimed carryforwards.

0 coins

This is really helpful Ryan! I'm dealing with a similar mix of FEIE and business losses creating my negative AGI. Can you clarify - when you filed Form 1045, did you have to wait for that to be processed before you could amend the following year's return? Or could you file both amendments at the same time? I'm trying to figure out the timing since I need to get both my 2022 and 2023 returns corrected.

0 coins

StarSeeker

•

Reading through all these responses as someone who just went through this exact situation! The advice about treating one job as "primary" for withholding purposes is spot-on. I made the mistake of trying to coordinate withholding between both my jobs initially and it was a nightmare to track. What worked for me was similar to what others suggested - I added extra withholding to my higher-paying job's W-4 (about $85 per paycheck) and left my second job's W-4 completely standard. The key insight for me was realizing that with variable hours, you can't rely on the standard multiple jobs calculations anyway. One thing I'd add that helped me - I set a calendar reminder to check my year-to-date withholding every 3 months. This way I could catch any issues early and adjust that line 4(c) amount if my hours were consistently higher or lower than expected. It's so much easier to tweak one number at one job than trying to rebalance everything across multiple employers. Your $80 per paycheck plan sounds perfect for your situation - that buffer above the calculated $67 will definitely come in handy when hours fluctuate. Good luck with the new job transition!

0 coins

This is such great advice! The calendar reminder for quarterly withholding checks is brilliant - I definitely would have forgotten to monitor it regularly without some kind of system in place. It's so easy to just submit the W-4 and then forget about it until tax time, but with variable hours it really does need that ongoing attention. I'm curious about your experience with the quarterly reviews - did you find you needed to adjust that extra withholding amount often, or did it tend to stay pretty stable once you found the right number? I'm wondering if the initial calculation tends to be pretty accurate for most people, or if there's usually a learning curve as you figure out your actual income patterns. The peace of mind aspect you mentioned is huge too. I've been stressed about this for weeks, but hearing from multiple people who've successfully used this approach makes me feel much more confident about moving forward with it.

0 coins

As someone who's been working with multiple W-4 forms for years, I can confirm that the "primary job for withholding" approach mentioned throughout this thread is absolutely the way to go with variable hours. The standard IRS worksheets and multiple jobs checkbox just don't handle irregular schedules well. Your situation with 8-15 hours at $32/hr and 12-40 hours at $21/hr is perfect for this method. I'd definitely go with the $80 per paycheck extra withholding on your current job's W-4 (line 4(c)) rather than the calculated $67 - that buffer is crucial when hours fluctuate wildly. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is to keep copies of both your updated W-4 forms for your records. When tax season comes around, it's helpful to remember exactly what withholding strategy you used, especially if you need to make adjustments for the following year. Also, don't be surprised if it takes 1-2 pay periods for the extra withholding to show up on your paystub after submitting the updated W-4. Payroll systems sometimes have a delay in processing changes. Just wanted to mention that so you don't panic if the first paycheck after your update looks the same! The consensus here is solid - keep it simple, handle everything through one job, and monitor periodically. You've got this!

0 coins

Prev1...10631064106510661067...5643Next