IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Based on what you've described, your camper trailer should definitely qualify for the mortgage interest deduction as a second home! Since you're living in it 8 months out of the year and it has all the basic living facilities (kitchen, bathroom, sleeping area), you meet the IRS requirements. A few key things to keep in mind: Make sure your loan is secured by the camper itself - it sounds like it is since you mentioned a camper loan. You'll want to get documentation of the interest paid from your lender (Form 1098 if they issue one, or at least a year-end statement). Also, don't forget that any personal property taxes you pay on the camper may be deductible too. Since you're using this for work travel, you might also want to explore whether any portion could qualify for business deductions if you're self-employed or an independent contractor. Just make sure to keep detailed records of your work-related travel versus personal use. The documentation will be crucial if the IRS ever has questions about your deductions.

0 coins

Chloe Zhang

β€’

This is really helpful advice! I'm new to this whole mobile living thing and had no idea about the personal property tax deduction. Do you happen to know if there's a minimum amount of time you need to live in the camper each year to qualify? Also, since you mentioned business deductions - I'm technically a W-2 employee but do seasonal contract work. Would that still qualify for any business-related camper deductions, or does it have to be true self-employment?

0 coins

Great question about mobile living tax deductions! From what you've described, your camper trailer should absolutely qualify as a second home for mortgage interest deduction purposes. The IRS requirements are pretty straightforward - it needs sleeping, cooking, and toilet facilities (which you have), and you need to use it as a residence for at least 14 days per year or 10% of rental days. Living in it 8 months definitely exceeds this threshold. A few important points to consider: Make sure your loan is secured by the camper itself, keep all documentation of interest payments (request Form 1098 from your lender or at least a year-end interest statement), and remember that personal property taxes on the camper may also be deductible. Since you're doing seasonal contracting work, you might want to explore whether any portion could qualify for business deductions depending on your employment classification. If you're an independent contractor rather than a W-2 employee, there could be additional opportunities there. Either way, keep detailed records of work-related travel versus personal use - this documentation will be crucial for supporting your deductions. The key is that your camper functions as a legitimate residence, which it clearly does given your living situation. Just make sure to itemize deductions on Schedule A to claim the mortgage interest, and consider consulting with a tax professional who understands mobile living situations if you have complex circumstances.

0 coins

Nora Brooks

β€’

I'm a tax professional and see situations like this regularly. The key issue isn't whether your sister opened a separate trust account - it's proper documentation and tax reporting. What you should focus on is ensuring the trust files Form 1041 using its own EIN, and that your K-1 accurately reflects your share of trust income. The house sale proceeds should be reported on the trust return, not on anyone's personal return. Even though the money flowed through your sister's personal account, the trust is still the legal entity that owned and sold the property. Request a copy of the trust's tax return before it's filed so you can verify everything looks correct. Also ask to see the calculation showing how your distribution was determined - this protects both of you if there are ever questions later. While your sister's approach creates more paperwork complications, as long as she maintains proper records and reports everything correctly, you should be fine tax-wise. Just make sure you report exactly what's on your K-1 when you file your personal return.

0 coins

Amina Diallo

β€’

As someone new to trust issues, this professional perspective is really helpful. I've been getting overwhelmed by all the different aspects people have mentioned, but you're right that the core issue is proper tax reporting rather than which bank account was used. Your point about requesting a copy of the trust's tax return before filing is something I hadn't thought of - that seems like a reasonable ask that would give me confidence everything is being handled correctly. And seeing the distribution calculation would definitely help me understand how my portion was determined. One question: if the trust doesn't have its own EIN and my sister has been using her SSN for everything, how big of a problem is that? Should I be pushing her to get an EIN now, or is it too late if she's already received the 1099-S and other documents under her social security number? I'm hoping to approach her this weekend with a collaborative tone rather than an accusatory one, and having specific, reasonable requests like these makes that conversation feel much more doable. Thanks for the professional insight - it's reassuring to hear from someone who deals with these situations regularly.

0 coins

AstroAce

β€’

I'm a CPA who specializes in trust and estate taxation, and I want to address your EIN question directly since it's critical for proper reporting. If your sister has been using her SSN instead of the trust's EIN, that's a significant problem that needs immediate correction. Trusts are required to have their own EIN for tax reporting purposes - using the trustee's SSN essentially means the trust income is being reported as the trustee's personal income, which is completely incorrect. The good news is it's not too late to fix this. She can apply for an EIN online at the IRS website (it takes about 15 minutes), and then contact the entities that issued tax documents to request corrected forms with the proper EIN. For the 1099-S specifically, she should contact the closing company/title company to request a corrected form showing the trust as the seller with the trust's new EIN. Most will cooperate since they want their records to be accurate too. This correction is essential because without it, the IRS will expect to see this income on her personal tax return, creating a massive tax liability she doesn't actually owe. Meanwhile, the trust won't be filing its required return, which can trigger penalties and interest. Don't let her brush this off as "unnecessary paperwork" - proper entity separation is fundamental to trust administration and tax compliance.

0 coins

Natalia Stone

β€’

This is exactly the kind of detailed, professional guidance I needed to hear. The distinction between using her SSN versus the trust's EIN makes everything click - I can see now why this isn't just a paperwork preference but a fundamental compliance issue. Your point about the IRS expecting to see this income on her personal return if she used her SSN is particularly alarming. That could create a huge tax burden for her personally while leaving the trust non-compliant. No wonder she might be reluctant to discuss the details if she realizes she's been doing this incorrectly. The fact that it's not too late to fix gives me hope, and knowing that getting an EIN only takes 15 minutes online makes this seem very manageable. I'm definitely going to ask her directly which tax ID she's been using, and if it's her SSN, I'll share this information about getting it corrected. The suggestion about contacting the title company for a corrected 1099-S is particularly helpful - I hadn't realized that was even possible. That alone could solve a major piece of the puzzle. I really appreciate you taking the time to explain the technical requirements so clearly. Having this level of specific, actionable guidance makes me feel much more confident about approaching her with these concerns. This isn't just me being paranoid - these are legitimate compliance requirements that need to be addressed.

0 coins

Don't forget about foreign stocks if your dad had any! My mother inherited some Canadian company stocks from my father, and there were special rules about foreign securities that almost caused us to miss out on significant tax advantages. The step-up basis applies, but there can be currency conversion considerations too. The broker should be handling this, but it's worth specifically asking how they're determining the stepped-up basis for any foreign investments. In our case, they initially only adjusted for the stock price change but missed the currency fluctuation component.

0 coins

Amara Nnamani

β€’

This is a great point. We had the same issue with some Japanese stocks in my grandfather's portfolio. The currency exchange rate on the date of death versus the purchase date had a huge impact on the actual gain/loss calculation. The brokerage completely overlooked this until we specifically brought it up.

0 coins

I'm sorry for your loss, Aisha. Going through this process while grieving is incredibly difficult, and I can relate to feeling overwhelmed by all the financial details. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is the importance of getting multiple copies of the death certificate from the funeral home or vital records office. Each brokerage will likely want an original or certified copy, and if your father had accounts at several firms, you'll need quite a few. I learned this the hard way when we had to wait weeks for additional copies while the estate settlement was delayed. Also, keep detailed records of everything - dates you contacted each brokerage, names of representatives you spoke with, and any reference numbers they give you. Some brokerages are much faster at processing these requests than others, and having good documentation helps if you need to follow up or if there are any discrepancies later. The step-up basis will definitely help reduce future tax burdens when your mom eventually sells any of these investments, so it's worth taking the time to get it done properly. Wishing you and your family the best as you navigate this difficult time.

0 coins

Thank you for mentioning the multiple death certificates - that's such practical advice that I wouldn't have thought of ahead of time. I'm already feeling overwhelmed by the paperwork aspect of everything, so knowing to get extra copies upfront will save us from delays later. The record-keeping tip is really valuable too. With everything else going on, it's easy to forget who you talked to and when. I'm going to start a simple spreadsheet to track all our communications with the different brokerages. I really appreciate everyone's help in this thread. There are so many details about the step-up basis process that I never would have known to ask about. It's reassuring to know that others have successfully navigated this and that there are resources available when we need more specific guidance.

0 coins

CyberNinja

β€’

This is such a helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar situation where my single-member LLC had losses in 2023 but I'm expecting profits in 2024. One thing that's been confusing me is the interaction between NOL carryforwards and the QBI (Qualified Business Income) deduction. If I use my NOL carryforward to offset business income in 2024, does that reduce my QBI deduction for that year? It seems like the NOL would reduce my taxable business income, which would then reduce the amount eligible for the 20% QBI deduction. Has anyone navigated this combination of NOL carryforward and QBI? I'm trying to figure out if there's an optimal strategy for timing the use of my NOL to maximize both benefits.

0 coins

Ravi Kapoor

β€’

Great question about the NOL and QBI interaction! You're absolutely right that this creates a potential conflict between maximizing current tax savings and preserving future QBI benefits. When you use NOL carryforward to offset business income, it does reduce the income that's eligible for the QBI deduction. So if you have $50,000 in business income in 2024 and use $20,000 of NOL carryforward, you'd only have $30,000 eligible for the 20% QBI deduction instead of the full $50,000. One strategy some people use is to only utilize enough NOL each year to stay within lower tax brackets, preserving both the remaining NOL for future years and maximizing QBI on the income they do report. Since NOL carryforwards are now indefinite (post-2017), you have flexibility in timing. Have you run the numbers both ways to see which approach gives you better long-term tax savings? The optimal strategy really depends on your expected income trajectory and tax bracket projections for the next few years.

0 coins

StarSeeker

β€’

This is exactly the kind of complex tax situation where having multiple moving pieces can create unexpected interactions. The NOL/QBI timing question is particularly tricky because you're essentially choosing between immediate tax relief and future deduction optimization. One approach I'd suggest is creating a multi-year projection model. Map out different scenarios: using all available NOL immediately vs. spreading it over several years to preserve QBI benefits. Don't forget to factor in potential changes to your business income, other income sources, and even possible changes to tax law. Also consider that the QBI deduction has income limitations (phases out completely at $364,200 for single filers in 2024), so if you expect your income to grow significantly, it might make sense to maximize QBI in earlier years when you're still under those thresholds. The 80% limitation on NOL usage gives you some natural spreading anyway - you can't use NOL to offset more than 80% of your taxable income in any given year. This might actually work in your favor for preserving some QBI benefit even when using carryforwards. Have you considered consulting with a tax professional who specializes in business taxation? This kind of multi-year strategic planning is where their expertise really pays off.

0 coins

Sophia Russo

β€’

This is really valuable advice about creating a multi-year projection model! As someone new to dealing with NOLs, I hadn't considered how the 80% limitation might actually help preserve some QBI benefits. One thing I'm wondering about - when you mention the QBI phase-out thresholds, does that apply to the business income before or after NOL adjustments? If my gross business income puts me over the threshold but my net income (after NOL carryforward) brings me back under, which number determines my QBI eligibility? Also, for those who've worked with tax professionals on this kind of strategic planning, roughly how much should I budget for that level of analysis? I want to make sure the cost of the advice doesn't eat up the potential tax savings!

0 coins

Sofia Price

β€’

One additional consideration that hasn't been mentioned - make sure you understand the timing implications for your 2025 tax filing. Since this buyout is happening this year, you'll need to report it on your 2025 tax return (filed in 2026). If you're planning to move after the buyout, be aware that the Section 121 exclusion is a once-every-two-years benefit. So if you buy another home and need to sell it quickly for any reason, you won't be able to use the exclusion again until 2027. Also, since you're in Illinois, double-check if there are any state-specific forms or requirements. While Illinois generally follows federal tax treatment for capital gains, it's worth confirming there aren't any additional state reporting requirements for property transfers between unmarried partners. The fact that you've lived there as your primary residence for 3 years puts you in a good position with the federal exclusion, but documenting everything properly now will save you headaches next tax season.

0 coins

Freya Thomsen

β€’

This is really good timing information! I didn't realize the Section 121 exclusion had a two-year waiting period between uses. That's definitely something to keep in mind for future planning. Quick follow-up question - if someone doesn't meet the full 2-year ownership requirement but qualifies for a partial exclusion due to unforeseen circumstances (like a breakup), does that partial use still trigger the two-year waiting period? Or can they potentially use the full exclusion sooner if they meet all requirements on a future sale? Also, regarding Illinois state requirements - I found that Illinois doesn't have a separate capital gains tax, so whatever exclusion applies federally should work for state taxes too. But definitely worth double-checking with a local tax professional since property transfer rules can vary by county.

0 coins

MidnightRider

β€’

@Freya Thomsen Great question about the partial exclusion and waiting period! Yes, even using a partial Section 121 exclusion still triggers the full two-year waiting period before you can use it again. The IRS doesn t'prorate the waiting period based on how much of the exclusion you used - it s'an all-or-nothing rule. So if you use any portion of the exclusion in 2025 even (just a partial one due to unforeseen circumstances ,)you wouldn t'be eligible to use it again until 2027, regardless of whether you meet all the requirements on a future sale. This makes it even more important to carefully consider the timing if you re'planning any major life changes. If you think you might need to sell another property in the next couple years, you might want to weigh whether it s'worth using the exclusion now or paying the capital gains tax and preserving the exclusion for a potentially larger gain later. You re'absolutely right about Illinois following federal treatment - no separate state capital gains tax makes this much simpler than in states like California or New York where you d'have additional state-level considerations.

0 coins

Sean O'Connor

β€’

I just want to emphasize how important it is to get proper documentation for everything, especially since you mentioned this is a breakup situation. Even if things are amicable now, having everything legally documented protects both of you. A few things I learned from my own similar situation last year: 1. Get a formal property appraisal - don't just rely on online estimates or comparable sales. The $500 cost is worth it to establish an indisputable fair market value. 2. Have a real estate attorney draft a buyout agreement that clearly states the property value, your equity calculation, payment terms, and timeline for deed/mortgage changes. This isn't just for legal protection - the IRS may want to see this documentation if they ever question your capital gains calculation. 3. Keep every receipt and document related to your ownership: original purchase documents, mortgage statements showing principal payments, receipts for any improvements (even small ones), and records of shared expenses. 4. Consider the timing carefully. Since you qualify for the Section 121 exclusion, you're in good shape tax-wise. But remember you can only use this exclusion once every two years, so if you're planning to buy another place soon, factor that into your decision-making. The fact that you've lived there for 3 years puts you in an excellent position with the federal exclusion, and since Illinois follows federal treatment, you shouldn't have additional state complications. Just make sure everything is properly documented now to avoid headaches during tax season.

0 coins

Oliver Wagner

β€’

This is excellent comprehensive advice! I'm in a very similar situation right now - my partner and I are splitting up after 2.5 years of homeownership, and I was feeling pretty overwhelmed by all the moving pieces. The point about getting a formal appraisal really resonates with me. We were initially going to just use Zillow estimates to avoid the cost, but you're absolutely right that having an official, defensible valuation is worth the $500. Especially in a breakup situation where emotions can run high, having that neutral third-party assessment removes any potential for disagreement down the road. I hadn't thought about the timing implications with the Section 121 exclusion either. Since I'm planning to potentially relocate and buy again within the next year or two, I need to factor in that two-year waiting period. It's good to know this now rather than be surprised by it later. One question - when you mention keeping receipts for improvements, how detailed did you get? Like, are we talking about every single Home Depot receipt, or just major projects? I'm trying to figure out what level of documentation is actually necessary versus overkill. Thanks for sharing your experience - it's really helpful to hear from someone who's been through this process successfully.

0 coins

Prev1...10591060106110621063...5643Next