IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm in a similar situation with ISOs from my fintech startup. One additional tip I'd add - make sure to track the exact date you exercised because the one-year holding period for long-term capital gains treatment starts from the exercise date, not the grant date. Also, I learned that if you exercise ISOs in multiple tranches throughout the year, each exercise needs to be reported separately on Form 6251. You can't just lump them all together. Each exercise has its own AMT adjustment calculation based on the specific FMV on that exercise date. For anyone still confused about the mechanics, the IRS Publication 525 has a section specifically on incentive stock options that breaks down the reporting requirements pretty clearly. It's dry reading but worth it to understand exactly what you're dealing with before you file. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - especially the suggestions about the tax tools and IRS callback service. This stuff is way more complex than it should be!

0 coins

Miguel Silva

•

Thanks for mentioning the separate reporting requirement for multiple exercises - that's a detail I completely missed! I exercised ISOs three different times last year and was planning to just add them all up. Good thing I saw your comment before filing. The point about tracking exercise dates for the holding period is crucial too. I've been keeping a spreadsheet with exercise dates, share quantities, strike prices, and FMVs for each transaction. Definitely recommend this approach to anyone with multiple ISO exercises - it'll save you major headaches down the road when you're trying to figure out which shares qualify for long-term treatment. One more thing I'd add - if your startup gets acquired before you meet the holding period requirements, all your ISO shares automatically become disqualifying dispositions regardless of how long you've held them. Found this out when researching my situation and it's definitely something to keep in mind when planning your exercise timing around potential company events.

0 coins

Amina Toure

•

This is an excellent comprehensive discussion! As someone who just went through ISO exercise reporting for the first time, I wanted to add one more consideration that hasn't been mentioned - state tax implications. I exercised ISOs while living in California, and CA has its own AMT calculation that can be different from federal AMT. Some states don't have AMT at all, while others like California and New York have their own versions with different exemption amounts and rates. If you moved states between exercising and filing (or plan to move before selling), the tax treatment can get even more complex. California, for example, may still want to tax the gain from ISOs exercised while you were a CA resident, even if you're living elsewhere when you sell. I ended up consulting with a CPA who specializes in equity compensation because the state/federal interaction was beyond what the tax software could handle properly. For anyone with a substantial ISO exercise (especially if state changes are involved), it might be worth the investment in professional help to make sure you're not missing any state-specific requirements. The multi-state ISO tax planning is definitely something to consider before exercising large amounts of options, not after!

0 coins

Dylan Baskin

•

Has anyone used QuickBooks for partnership accounting? I'm trying to figure out if I need to completely restructure my books when I convert from sole prop to partnership or if there's an easy way to handle the transition.

0 coins

Lauren Wood

•

I use QuickBooks Online and it handles partnerships pretty well. You'll need to set up separate owner's equity accounts for each partner and make sure distributions are properly tracked. The bigger challenge is setting up the initial capital contributions correctly - especially if one partner is contributing assets rather than cash.

0 coins

Niko Ramsey

•

I went through this exact transition last year with my consulting LLC. One thing that caught me off guard was the estimated tax payment requirements for partnerships. Unlike when you're a sole proprietor and can just make quarterly payments based on your own income, partnerships have to make estimated payments based on the partnership's total income, and then each partner is responsible for their share. Also, make sure you document everything about your partner's initial capital contribution - whether it's cash, equipment, or sweat equity. The IRS is pretty strict about how these contributions are valued and recorded, especially if there's a significant imbalance between what each partner is putting in. We had to get our computers and office equipment professionally appraised to establish the basis correctly. One last tip: set up separate bank accounts for the partnership right away. Mixing personal and business funds becomes even more problematic when you have multiple partners, and the IRS scrutinizes partnership transactions more closely than sole proprietorships.

0 coins

This is really helpful advice! I'm actually in the early stages of considering bringing on a partner myself, and I hadn't thought about the equipment valuation aspect. When you say you had to get professional appraisals, was that expensive? And did you need to do that even for relatively standard office equipment like computers and printers, or just for more specialized/valuable items? Also, regarding the separate bank accounts - do you mean completely new accounts, or can you convert your existing sole prop business account to a partnership account with the same bank?

0 coins

Nia Thompson

•

One thing I learned the hard way - make sure you're using the space "exclusively" for business if you want to claim the home office deduction. The IRS is really strict about this. If you sometimes use that room to watch TV, store personal stuff, or let guests sleep there, you can't claim it as a business expense. I got audited a few years back because I claimed my spare bedroom as an office, but I also had a pullout couch in there for guests. The auditor disallowed the entire deduction because it wasn't exclusively business use. Now I have a dedicated office space that's only used for work - no exceptions. Also, keep detailed records of your square footage measurements and take photos showing the business use. If you get audited, they'll want proof that the space is truly dedicated to business activities only.

0 coins

This is such an important point that not enough people understand! I made a similar mistake when I first started working from home. I was using my "office" to fold laundry and store holiday decorations, thinking it wouldn't matter since I used it for work 90% of the time. The IRS doesn't care about percentages when it comes to exclusive use - it's all or nothing. Even occasional personal use can disqualify the entire deduction. It's actually better to claim a smaller space that's truly exclusive than a larger space that has any personal use. Thanks for sharing your audit experience - it's a good reminder that the IRS does check these things and the exclusive use test is real!

0 coins

Diego Flores

•

Just went through this exact same situation! Your instincts are completely correct - claiming 100% of your property taxes and homeowners insurance as business expenses when you only use one room is definitely wrong and could trigger an audit. Here's what I did: I measured my office space (12x10 = 120 sq ft) and my total home square footage (1,800 sq ft), which gave me about 6.7% business use. So I could only deduct 6.7% of my property taxes, homeowners insurance, utilities, mortgage interest, etc. The key is to manually override what your tax software is doing. Most software has an option to enter "actual expenses" instead of letting it auto-categorize everything. You'll want to calculate your business percentage first, then apply it to all your home-related expenses. Also keep really good records - I created a simple spreadsheet showing my calculations and took photos of my office space with measurements marked. The IRS loves to audit home office deductions, so having documentation ready is crucial. Better to claim the correct smaller amount than risk penalties later!

0 coins

Raul Neal

•

This is exactly the kind of detailed approach I needed to see! I've been worried about getting the calculations wrong. Quick question - when you say you override the tax software's auto-categorization, do you just manually enter the reduced amounts (like your 6.7% portion) directly into the business expense fields? Or do you need to create some kind of separate calculation worksheet within the software? I'm using TurboTax and want to make sure I'm documenting this correctly in case of an audit.

0 coins

Miguel Ortiz

•

This is such a helpful thread! I'm dealing with this exact same situation right now - I see Schedule A in my tax documents but I'm pretty sure I took the standard deduction. Reading through everyone's explanations has been incredibly reassuring. I especially appreciate the multiple verification methods people have shared: checking line 12a on Form 1040, looking at the actual deduction amount used in the tax calculation, and reviewing the tax summary in your software account. It's really helpful to have several ways to confirm what actually happened. As someone who also tends to click through tax software screens without paying close attention (we've all been there!), it's comforting to know that these programs are designed to make the optimal choice automatically. The fact that Schedule A can be included just as documentation of the comparison process - not necessarily as the method actually used - is something I never understood before this discussion. Thanks to everyone who shared their knowledge and personal experiences. Tax season is stressful enough without these kinds of confusions, and having a supportive community to explain these things makes such a difference!

0 coins

I'm so glad this thread has been helpful for you too! It really does make tax season less stressful when you realize how many people go through the same confusions and worries. What I found most eye-opening from this discussion is learning that Schedule A being present is actually a *good* thing - it means the software did its job properly by evaluating both options. Before reading all these responses, I would have assumed seeing Schedule A meant I definitely itemized, which would have sent me into the same panic that started this whole conversation. The multiple verification methods everyone shared are fantastic. I'm definitely going to bookmark this thread for future reference! It's like having a checklist of ways to double-check your return when those post-filing anxieties kick in. And knowing that tax professionals and CPAs see this confusion constantly makes it feel so much more normal. Here's to hoping next tax season we'll all be a little more confident about understanding what our returns actually show!

0 coins

This has been such an incredibly thorough and helpful discussion! As someone who works with taxpayers regularly, I want to add one more reassuring point: the IRS actually expects to see these kinds of supporting schedules in tax software-prepared returns, even when they're not the final method used. What's happening with your Schedule A is completely standard practice. Think of it like this - when you go to a restaurant and the waiter tells you about both the soup and salad options, then you choose the salad, the kitchen doesn't get confused about what you ordered just because soup was mentioned. Similarly, the IRS sees the Schedule A as documentation that both options were properly considered. Your software made exactly the right choice by giving you the $13,850 standard deduction instead of your $9,400 in itemized expenses. You saved yourself $4,450 in additional deductions, which translates to real tax savings! No amended return needed, no mistakes made - everything worked exactly as it should have. For peace of mind, you can always call the IRS to confirm (though as others mentioned, the wait times can be brutal), but based on everything you've described, you're absolutely in the clear. The system worked perfectly for you!

0 coins

This restaurant analogy is perfect! I love how you explained it - just because soup was mentioned doesn't mean that's what I ordered. That really clicks for me as someone who learns better with real-world comparisons. The reassurance about this being standard practice for the IRS is exactly what I needed to hear. I was worried that having Schedule A might somehow flag my return or cause confusion on their end, but knowing they actually expect to see these supporting schedules makes so much sense. And wow, I keep being amazed by the actual dollar impact - saving $4,450 in additional deductions is significant! I had no idea the difference was that substantial. It really drives home how important it is to let the software do its job rather than second-guessing it after the fact. This whole thread has been like a masterclass in understanding tax returns. I feel so much more confident now about what happened with my filing, and I'll definitely be less anxious about these kinds of questions in the future. Thank you for adding that final piece of professional reassurance!

0 coins

AstroAce

•

I've been following this thread and wanted to add one more perspective that might help! As someone who went through this exact same frustration, I think you've gotten some excellent advice here about filling out a new W-4 and adding additional withholding. One thing I'd emphasize is don't overthink it too much - the fact that you're only owing $80 means you're actually very close to the sweet spot. That's honestly better withholding accuracy than a lot of people achieve, even with professional help. The mid-year raise timing that others mentioned is probably a huge factor. I had the same issue where my March raise threw off my withholding calculations for the rest of the year because the system had been projecting my annual income based on my pre-raise salary. My recommendation would be to use that IRS withholding calculator someone mentioned, add about $10-15 extra per paycheck through the new W-4, and then just monitor your paystubs for a few months to make sure everything looks reasonable. You've got this figured out now! And seriously, don't feel bad about the confusion - the transition from the old allowance system to the new W-4 format caught so many people off guard. Even tax professionals had to relearn how to advise clients on withholding. You're handling it exactly the right way by asking questions and getting informed about the changes.

0 coins

Thank you so much for this reassuring perspective! You're absolutely right that owing $80 isn't actually that bad - I think I was just panicking because I wasn't expecting the shift from getting refunds to owing money. It's really helpful to hear that even tax professionals had to relearn this stuff when the W-4 changed. That makes me feel a lot less silly for being confused! I've been beating myself up thinking I should understand this better, but clearly it's genuinely complicated. I'm going to follow your advice and not overthink it. The plan is to use the IRS calculator, add that $10-15 extra per paycheck, and monitor things for a few months like you suggested. That seems like a totally manageable approach. Thanks to everyone who contributed to this thread - I came here feeling completely lost and frustrated, and now I actually feel confident about fixing this! It's amazing how much clearer everything becomes when people share their real experiences and practical solutions.

0 coins

I'm so glad you found this thread helpful! Your situation is incredibly common and you're absolutely taking the right approach by getting informed and asking questions. One small tip I'd add to all the great advice you've received - when you submit your new W-4 to HR, consider asking them to confirm they've processed it correctly. Sometimes there can be delays in payroll system updates, and you want to make sure the changes actually take effect on your next paycheck. You can usually tell if it worked by looking at your next pay stub - you should see the federal withholding amount increase slightly (by whatever extra amount you specified in Step 4c). If it doesn't change, follow up with HR to make sure the new form was entered into their system properly. You've got a solid plan now with the IRS calculator and adding that extra $10-15 per paycheck. That small adjustment should easily cover your $80 gap and probably give you a tiny refund instead. Best of luck getting it all sorted out!

0 coins

This is such great practical advice about following up with HR! I definitely wouldn't have thought to verify that the new W-4 was processed correctly - I would have just assumed it worked and then been confused if my withholding didn't change. Your tip about checking the next pay stub for the increased federal withholding amount is really smart. That gives me a concrete way to confirm everything is working as expected rather than just hoping for the best. I really appreciate you taking the time to add this detail! Between all the advice in this thread about the IRS calculator, the new W-4 format, and now this follow-up tip, I feel like I have a complete roadmap for fixing this issue. It's been so reassuring to learn that this confusion is totally normal and that there are clear, actionable steps to resolve it. Thanks again to everyone who shared their experiences and solutions - this community is amazing!

0 coins

Prev1...10571058105910601061...5644Next