IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I've been working as a tax preparer for over 15 years and see this Direct Pay issue constantly during tax season. The system has gotten worse over the years, not better. Here's my professional recommendation based on what usually works: **Immediate solution for your deadline:** Call 1-888-PAY-1040 and pay the $3.99 fee. It processes instantly and you'll have a confirmation number within minutes. Don't risk penalties over a few dollars. **For future reference:** The most common cause I see for these generic rejections is mismatched personal information between your tax return and bank account. Even something as simple as having "Robert" on your tax return but "Bob" on your bank account will cause a silent failure. **Quick diagnostic test:** Before trying Direct Pay again, call your bank and ask them to read back exactly how your name appears on the account. Compare that word-for-word with how it appears on your tax return. Also verify they haven't flagged any IRS payment attempts as fraud. The IRS payment systems are notoriously unreliable, especially near deadlines when traffic is heavy. You're doing everything right - the system is just poorly designed. Don't let it stress you out when there are reliable paid alternatives available. Good luck getting this sorted out!

0 coins

This professional perspective is really reassuring - thank you for sharing your 15+ years of experience with these issues! It's frustrating to know the system has actually gotten worse over time, but at least it confirms that this isn't user error on my part. Your point about the "Robert" vs "Bob" name mismatch is a perfect example of how nitpicky these systems can be. I'm definitely going to call my bank tomorrow morning to have them read back exactly how my name appears, character by character. It's such a simple thing to check but could easily be the root cause. I think you're absolutely right about just using the phone payment system at this point. I've probably spent more than $3.99 worth of my time trying to troubleshoot Direct Pay, and the peace of mind of having instant confirmation is worth way more than the small fee. Thanks for the reality check about not stressing over poorly designed government systems - sometimes I forget that these technical problems are incredibly common and not a reflection of doing something wrong. Your advice to focus on the reliable paid alternatives rather than fighting with broken free systems is spot on!

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

I've been following this thread and wanted to share something that might help - have you tried using a completely different device altogether? I had a similar issue last year where Direct Pay kept failing on my laptop, but when I tried the exact same payment information on my tablet, it went through immediately. Sometimes the issue isn't with your browser or personal information, but with device-specific settings like ad blockers, VPNs, or even certain antivirus software that can interfere with the IRS payment portal. My Norton antivirus was actually blocking part of the payment process without giving me any error messages about it. Also, if you haven't already, try temporarily disabling any browser extensions (especially password managers, ad blockers, or privacy extensions) before attempting the payment. These can sometimes interfere with the form submission process on government websites. Given that your deadline is so close though, I'd echo what the tax professionals here have said - the $3.99 phone payment fee is absolutely worth it for the immediate confirmation and peace of mind. You've already put in way more effort than should be necessary for what should be a simple payment process!

0 coins

Yuki Ito

•

This entire discussion has been incredibly eye-opening! I'm a tax preparer and see so many small businesses getting this wrong every tax season. One additional point I'd like to add - make sure you're also considering the impact on your workers' compensation insurance if you switch to reimbursements. Some states include stipends in the calculation of workers' comp premiums because they're treated as wages, but properly structured reimbursements under an accountable plan typically aren't included. This could be another small cost savings to factor into your decision. Also, for anyone implementing this change - don't forget to update your employee handbook and have clear communication about the new process. I've seen employees get confused when their paychecks change, even when it's beneficial to them. A simple explanation showing how the reimbursement approach saves them money on taxes goes a long way toward getting buy-in. One last tip: if you're using payroll software, make sure it can handle accountable plan reimbursements properly. Some basic systems struggle with this and might incorrectly include the reimbursements in taxable wages. It's worth double-checking with your payroll provider before making the switch. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this is exactly the kind of practical, real-world guidance that helps businesses navigate these complex tax rules!

0 coins

NeonNomad

•

This is such a valuable point about workers' compensation insurance that I hadn't considered! As someone new to running a business, there are so many interconnected pieces that I'm still learning about. The communication aspect you mentioned is really important too. I can definitely see how employees might be confused if their paycheck structure changes, even if it saves them money. Do you have any suggestions for how to explain this transition clearly? Like should we show them a before/after comparison of their take-home pay, or focus more on the tax savings aspect? Also, regarding payroll software - are there any specific systems you'd recommend that handle accountable plan reimbursements well? We're currently using a pretty basic solution and I'm wondering if we need to upgrade before making this switch. Thanks for adding yet another layer of practical considerations to think about!

0 coins

Khalil Urso

•

This thread has been absolutely fantastic! As someone who just discovered this community while researching tax implications for our company's remote work benefits, I'm blown away by the quality of insights shared here. I work for a mid-size tech company (about 80 employees) and we've been providing a flat $100 monthly "connectivity allowance" that covers both internet and phone expenses. After reading through all these comments, I'm realizing we're probably doing this in the most tax-inefficient way possible! A few quick questions for the group: 1. For companies that bundle internet AND phone reimbursements - do you handle them as separate line items or one combined reimbursement? 2. Has anyone dealt with international remote employees? We have a few team members in Canada and the UK, and I'm wondering if the accountable plan approach works the same way for them. 3. The geographic tiering that Gabriel mentioned is brilliant - has anyone implemented this successfully with payroll systems like ADP or Workday? I'm definitely going to bring this discussion to our finance team. The potential savings on payroll taxes alone could be substantial across our headcount. Plus, our employees would benefit from not having these reimbursements treated as taxable income. Thanks to everyone who shared their expertise - this is exactly the kind of practical, actionable advice that makes these online communities so valuable!

0 coins

Welcome to the community! Great questions - you're absolutely right that bundling connectivity expenses as a flat allowance is probably the least tax-efficient approach. For your questions: 1. We handle internet and phone as separate line items in our reimbursement system. It makes the business justification clearer and allows for different caps based on actual usage patterns. Phone expenses can be trickier since personal use is often higher than internet. 2. International employees are more complex - you'll need to follow the tax rules in their countries of residence, not just US rules. For Canada/UK employees, they're typically not subject to US payroll taxes anyway, but you should definitely consult with international tax specialists about the local implications. 3. I haven't personally implemented geographic tiering with those specific platforms, but I know both ADP and Workday can handle location-based benefit calculations. You might need to work with your payroll administrator to set up custom reimbursement codes for different regions. The savings really do add up quickly with your headcount! I'd suggest running the numbers on your current system vs. an accountable plan approach - the difference in payroll taxes alone will probably make a compelling business case. Just make sure to plan the transition carefully like others mentioned.

0 coins

This has been such a valuable discussion! I'm actually dealing with a very similar situation - about $22k in annual dividends that I've been auto-reinvesting for years, and now I need around $15k for some unexpected medical expenses. Reading through all these responses, I'm realizing I've been approaching this way too simplistically. The idea of using specific identification to sell shares with the highest cost basis (like recent dividend reinvestments) is brilliant - I had no idea you could even choose which specific shares to sell! I'm definitely going to look into that partial dividend strategy too. Having 30-40% automatically go to cash would give me that liquidity buffer for situations exactly like this, while still getting the compound growth benefits on the majority of the dividends. One follow-up question though - for those of you doing the partial cash approach, do you find it creates any issues with your overall investment timeline? I'm wondering if having that cash sitting around earning minimal interest affects long-term returns significantly, or if the flexibility and reduced transaction costs make up for it. Also, huge thanks to everyone who shared those tool recommendations. I had no idea there were services specifically designed to optimize these kinds of investment tax decisions!

0 coins

Great question about the cash sitting around! I've been doing the partial cash approach for about 18 months now, and honestly the impact on long-term returns is pretty minimal. I keep about 35% of dividends as cash, and while that money does earn less in a money market account, the flexibility has been worth it. The key is not letting too much cash accumulate - I try to redeploy it within 2-3 months through rebalancing or opportunistic purchases during market dips. This way I'm not missing out on significant growth periods, but I have that buffer for situations like yours. For the medical expenses you mentioned, definitely look into the specific identification strategy! Since you've been reinvesting for years, you probably have shares purchased at many different price points. Selling the most recently purchased shares (highest cost basis) could save you hundreds or even thousands in capital gains taxes compared to just selling whatever shares your broker defaults to. Hope your medical situation works out well, and definitely check out those optimization tools - they can really help visualize the tax impact of different selling strategies before you commit to anything.

0 coins

Amy Fleming

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful! As someone who's been making the same mistake of auto-reinvesting everything without thinking about the tax implications, I'm definitely going to implement some of these strategies. One thing I wanted to add that might help others - if you're using a robo-advisor like Betterment or Wealthfront, many of them actually handle the tax-loss harvesting and specific share selection automatically. I switched to Betterment last year specifically because they do tax-loss harvesting and will automatically sell shares with the highest cost basis to minimize capital gains when you need to withdraw money. For those who prefer managing their own investments, the partial dividend cash strategy sounds perfect. I'm going to set up a 40/60 split (40% cash, 60% reinvest) at Schwab - this should give me that liquidity buffer while still getting most of the compounding benefits. Also want to echo what others said about keeping detailed records. Even if your brokerage tracks cost basis, having your own spreadsheet with dividend reinvestment dates and amounts has saved me so much time during tax season. Takes maybe 10 minutes per quarter to update but makes everything so much cleaner when you need to make tax-efficient selling decisions. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - this is exactly the kind of practical advice that makes a real difference!

0 coins

Does anyone know if TurboTax automatically applies your loss carryover from the previous year if you used TurboTax for both years? I swear it used to do this automatically but now I cant find where its pulling that data from.

0 coins

Ethan Moore

•

Yes, TurboTax should import it automatically if you're using the same account and you have last year's return in your TurboTax account. You can check by looking at Schedule D - there should be a line showing your carryover from last year. If it's not there, you might need to manually enter your capital loss carryover.

0 coins

I went through this exact same struggle last year! The Capital Loss Carryover Worksheet can be really confusing at first. Here's what helped me get through it: First, you definitely need your 2023 tax return - specifically Schedule D and Form 8949 if you filed one. Look for line 21 on your 2023 Schedule D, which shows your net capital loss for that year. For your situation with $4,300 in losses, you're right that there's a $3,000 annual limit for deducting capital losses against ordinary income. So if your net loss last year was more than $3,000 after accounting for any gains, the excess carries forward. The worksheet asks for your prior year AGI to determine if you need to use the Capital Loss Carryover Worksheet or if you can use a simpler method. Most people with straightforward situations can just enter the carryover amount directly on Schedule D. One thing that tripped me up initially - make sure you're looking at your NET capital loss from last year, not just the gross losses. TurboTax should have calculated this for you on last year's Schedule D. If you can't find your 2023 return, you can get a transcript from the IRS website or call them. Don't stress too much - once you have the right numbers, it's actually pretty straightforward!

0 coins

This is super helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation and was wondering - when you say "net capital loss," does that mean I need to subtract ALL my gains from ALL my losses first, or do short-term and long-term get calculated separately before netting? I had both types of transactions last year and I'm not sure if I should be looking at one combined number or keeping them separate through the whole process.

0 coins

Has anyone had experience with settlements that include back pay AND emotional distress? My understanding is they're taxed differently - wages are subject to both income tax and employment taxes, while emotional distress is only subject to income tax.

0 coins

Andre Moreau

•

Yes, you're right about the different tax treatment. I had a settlement last year with both components. The wage portion appeared on my W-2 with all the normal withholding. The emotional distress portion came on a 1099-MISC and I had to pay income tax but not Social Security or Medicare taxes on that part. Make sure your settlement agreement clearly specifies how much is allocated to each category!

0 coins

Lucy Taylor

•

Based on everything discussed here, it sounds like you're in a pretty straightforward situation compared to some of the more complex settlements mentioned. Since your $27k settlement appears to be primarily for lost wages from your employment dispute, you'll likely need to report the full amount as taxable income and can deduct your attorney fees as an above-the-line deduction (which effectively means you're only taxed on the $18k you received). For setting aside money for taxes, I'd recommend being conservative and setting aside about 25-30% of the $18k you actually received (so roughly $4,500-$5,400). This should cover both federal and state taxes depending on your bracket. Given the timing and amount, you should also consider making estimated tax payments to avoid underpayment penalties. The tools and services others have mentioned (taxr.ai for calculations and Claimyr for IRS questions) seem like they could save you a lot of headache in figuring out the specifics for your situation. Don't let this stress you out too much - employment settlements are pretty common and the tax treatment is well-established once you know the rules!

0 coins

This is really helpful advice! I'm actually in a similar boat - got a smaller settlement ($12k) from a workplace dispute last month and have been stressing about the tax implications. The 25-30% rule of thumb gives me a good starting point for how much to set aside. One question though - you mentioned making estimated tax payments. Since Zara's settlement just happened and we're already in April, would she need to make a payment by June 15th for the second quarter, or could she wait until next year when she files? I'm trying to figure out the timing for my own situation too.

0 coins

Prev1...10521053105410551056...5643Next