< Back to IRS

Jungleboo Soletrain

Internet Stipend vs Reimbursement: Tax Implications for Employees and Companies

Hey tax folks! I run a small software company (about 25 employees) and we've been providing everyone a monthly internet stipend of $75 since we went remote in 2022. Our accountant recently mentioned something about tax implications that got me concerned. I'm trying to understand if this internet stipend is taxable to both my company and the employees, or just to the employees? And if we switch to a reimbursement model instead (where employees submit their internet bills), would that change the tax situation for our company? Really appreciate any insights here - we're trying to do right by our team while also being smart about our tax obligations!

Rajan Walker

•

This is a great question that many businesses are dealing with since remote work became more common! Internet stipends (fixed monthly amounts) are generally considered taxable income to the employee. This means you need to include it in their W-2 wages, subject to income tax withholding and employment taxes (Social Security and Medicare). For your company, these stipends are deductible as a business expense, just like regular wages. If you switch to a reimbursement program where employees submit their actual internet bills, it could qualify as a tax-free benefit under an accountable plan if structured correctly. For this to work: 1) The expenses must have a business connection, 2) Employees must adequately account for the expenses within a reasonable time, and 3) Employees must return any excess reimbursement. Under a properly structured accountable plan, the reimbursements wouldn't be included in employee wages (not reported on W-2s) and wouldn't be subject to payroll taxes. The company would still deduct these as business expenses.

0 coins

Does this mean I should be paying taxes on the $100 internet stipend my employer gives me each month? They don't take any taxes out of it currently - it just shows up as a separate line item on my paycheck. Should I be concerned?

0 coins

Rajan Walker

•

Yes, if you're receiving a stipend that's a fixed amount regardless of your actual expenses, it should be treated as taxable income. Your employer should be withholding taxes on this amount and including it in your W-2 wages. If they're not withholding taxes, you're still responsible for reporting this income on your tax return. The fact that it appears as a separate line item on your paycheck suggests it's being tracked separately, but you should check whether it's included in your gross wages for tax purposes. If you're concerned, it's worth asking your HR or payroll department about how they're handling the tax treatment of this stipend.

0 coins

After spending 2 hours on the phone with our payroll provider about this exact issue, I found taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) and it saved me so much headache! I uploaded our employee handbook section about our internet stipend program and got crystal clear guidance about the tax implications. They confirmed what the first commenter said - stipends are taxable to employees but switching to an accountable plan with reimbursements can make it tax-free for them. The tool even helped me draft the policy language for converting our stipend to a proper accountable plan reimbursement program. Much easier than trying to piece together information from different sources!

0 coins

Ev Luca

•

How exactly does the taxr.ai thing work? Do they connect you with actual tax professionals or is it more like an AI chatbot? I'm wondering if it would help with our cell phone reimbursement policy too.

0 coins

Avery Davis

•

I'm a bit skeptical about these tax tools. How accurate is the information? As a small business owner I can't afford to get this wrong and face IRS penalties later.

0 coins

It uses AI to analyze your documents and tax situations, but what I found helpful is that it cites actual IRS publications and tax code sections. You upload your documents or type your question, and it analyzes everything according to current tax rules. Yes, it would definitely help with cell phone reimbursements! Those follow similar rules to internet stipends. I actually ran both scenarios through the system to compare the tax impacts of stipends versus accountable-plan reimbursements. It showed me the exact payroll tax savings for our 30-person company.

0 coins

Avery Davis

•

Just wanted to follow up - I tried taxr.ai for our situation with both internet and phone stipends. It was actually really helpful! It analyzed our current policy and showed exactly how much we could save in payroll taxes by switching to a reimbursement approach. Even gave us a template for the accountable plan documentation we needed. What surprised me was how it broke down the specific IRS regulations that applied to our situation. We ended up converting our $60 monthly internet stipend to a reimbursement program with a reasonable cap based on regional internet costs. Employees are happier too since the reimbursements aren't being taxed on their end!

0 coins

Collins Angel

•

Quick tip from someone who's been through this headache: if you want to talk to an actual IRS agent about this for official clarification, use Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). I spent days trying to get through to the IRS business help line with no luck. The Claimyr service got me connected to an IRS agent in about 15 minutes instead of the usual 3+ hour wait. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The IRS agent confirmed that internet stipends are taxable wages, but properly documented reimbursements under an accountable plan are not taxable to employees. Importantly, they explained how to document everything correctly to avoid issues during an audit. Worth the service fee just to get straight answers from the source!

0 coins

Marcelle Drum

•

Wait, you can actually pay to skip the IRS phone queue? How does that even work? Sounds kind of like paying to cut in line which doesn't seem right if it's a government service.

0 coins

Tate Jensen

•

I don't believe this works. I've tried EVERYTHING to get through to the IRS about a business tax issue and ended up hiring a tax attorney because it was impossible to reach anyone. No way there's some magical service that gets you through.

0 coins

Collins Angel

•

It doesn't actually let you "cut" the line - it uses technology to handle the waiting for you. You basically register your number, and their system calls the IRS and waits on hold. When they reach a human agent, they connect you to the call. You're still in the same queue as everyone else, but their system is doing the waiting instead of you being stuck listening to hold music for hours. I was completely skeptical too! But after spending multiple days trying to get through myself, I figured it was worth trying. The system called me back when an agent was on the line, and I was able to get my questions answered directly by the IRS. It saved me hours of frustration and let me keep working instead of being stuck on hold.

0 coins

Tate Jensen

•

I'm eating my words here. After seeing the comments about Claimyr, I decided to give it a shot with my impossible business tax situation. I had been trying for WEEKS to get clarification about our company's internet and cell phone reimbursement policies. The service actually worked exactly as described. I got a call back when they reached an IRS agent (took about 45 minutes in my case), and I was able to get official guidance. The agent confirmed that for internet expenses to be tax-free, we needed to implement an accountable plan with proper documentation. He even emailed me the relevant IRS publication pages. Definitely changed my approach - we're now having employees submit their internet bills quarterly instead of giving flat stipends, which is saving both them and us on taxes.

0 coins

Adaline Wong

•

Our company (200+ employees) just went through this transition from stipend to reimbursement. Here's what we learned: Internet stipends were creating an additional ~7.65% cost to the company in employer-paid FICA taxes, plus the employees were losing about 22-32% of the benefit to income taxes on their end. We switched to a reimbursement plan where employees submit either their full bill (if internet is used primarily for work) or a pro-rated portion (if they'd have personal internet anyway). The documentation is simple - just a quarterly submission of their bill. The company still gets the tax deduction either way, but the reimbursement approach saves on payroll taxes AND gives employees the full benefit amount. It was a win-win once we got the process streamlined.

0 coins

This is super helpful, thank you! Do you have your employees submit the actual bills or did you set up some kind of simplified form system? I'm trying to figure out the least administrative burden while still being compliant.

0 coins

Adaline Wong

•

We created a simple quarterly form in our expense system where employees upload a PDF or screenshot of their internet bill. They check a box certifying that the internet is used for business purposes, and submit the form. For partial reimbursements, we have them indicate the percentage used for work (we cap this at 50% unless their role requires higher usage). We found that quarterly submissions struck the right balance between administrative burden and compliance - monthly was too frequent and created too much paperwork, while annual didn't provide enough documentation to satisfy the "reasonable time period" requirement for an accountable plan.

0 coins

Gabriel Ruiz

•

Something nobody has mentioned yet - geographic considerations. Internet costs vary WILDLY depending on location. If you have remote employees across different regions, a flat stipend might be inadequate in high-cost areas but overly generous in others. When we switched to reimbursements, we created a tiered cap structure based on geographic cost data ($65 for low-cost areas, $85 for medium, $110 for high-cost areas like NYC, SF, etc.). This way employees get fair treatment while we maintain reasonable cost controls. Just something to consider if you have a distributed workforce!

0 coins

This is such a good point. I'm in rural Montana and pay $120/month for terrible satellite internet that barely works for video calls, while my coworker in the city pays $70 for gigabit fiber. The flat $50 stipend our company offers doesn't even come close to covering a fair portion of my costs.

0 coins

Xan Dae

•

Thanks for bringing up this important distinction! As someone who's worked in payroll for years, I want to emphasize one key point that could save businesses from costly mistakes: the IRS is very strict about what qualifies as a legitimate accountable plan. For internet reimbursements to be tax-free, you need THREE things: 1) Business connection (easy for remote work), 2) Adequate substantiation (receipts/bills), and 3) Return of excess amounts within a reasonable time. That third requirement trips up a lot of companies. If you set a monthly cap of $75 but an employee's bill is only $50, you can't just let them keep the extra $25. They either need to return it or it becomes taxable income. This is where many "reimbursement" programs accidentally become taxable stipends in the IRS's eyes. Also worth noting: if you're audited, the IRS will look at whether employees are actually submitting real bills or just generic receipts. I've seen companies get in trouble because they weren't properly validating the documentation. The geographic tiering mentioned by Gabriel is smart - it shows you're making genuine business decisions rather than just trying to avoid taxes.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of detailed guidance I was hoping to find! The point about having to return excess amounts is crucial - I had no idea about that requirement. Our current $75 stipend system definitely doesn't handle this properly. Quick question: when you mention "return of excess amounts within a reasonable time," what does the IRS consider reasonable? Is this something like 30 days, or do they give more flexibility? And do you have any recommendations for how to structure the return process without creating a huge administrative burden? Also, regarding the validation of bills - are there specific red flags the IRS looks for during audits, or is it more about having a consistent process in place?

0 coins

KaiEsmeralda

•

Great questions! For the "reasonable time" requirement, the IRS typically considers 60 days reasonable for returning excess reimbursements, though some companies use 30 days to be extra safe. We've found quarterly reconciliation works well - employees submit their bills quarterly, and if there's an overpayment, they either return it or we adjust the next quarter's reimbursement. For administrative simplicity, many companies handle this by setting reimbursement caps at realistic levels (maybe 80th percentile of regional costs) and only reimbursing up to actual expenses. This way you rarely have overpayments to deal with. Regarding audit red flags: The IRS looks for patterns like employees consistently submitting the exact same amount each month (suggests fake bills), generic receipts without provider details, or bills that don't match the employee's home address. Having a clear written policy, consistent application across all employees, and genuine business justification are your best protections. Documentation showing you actually reviewed the submissions rather than just rubber-stamping them is also important.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm a CPA who specializes in small business taxation, and I wanted to add a few practical considerations for implementing the switch from stipends to reimbursements. One thing I always tell my clients is to check your state tax implications too - while the federal rules are fairly clear, some states have additional requirements or treat these differently. For example, California has stricter rules about what constitutes a proper business expense reimbursement. Also, consider the timing of your switch. If you're currently treating stipends as taxable wages, switching mid-year can create payroll complications. It's often cleaner to make the change at the beginning of a calendar year or pay period to avoid confusion in your payroll reporting. For documentation, I recommend requiring employees to certify that their home internet is used for business purposes and what percentage. This creates a paper trail that shows business intent, which is crucial if you're ever questioned by the IRS. Even if someone's internet is 90% personal use, as long as there's legitimate business usage and proper documentation, a reasonable portion can be reimbursed tax-free. The savings really do add up - for a $75 monthly stipend per employee, you're looking at about $688 in annual payroll tax savings per employee by switching to proper reimbursements ($75 x 12 months x 7.65% employer FICA). Multiply that by your headcount and it becomes significant money.

0 coins

Ben Cooper

•

This is such valuable insight about the state-level considerations! I hadn't even thought about how California might have different rules. As someone just getting started with understanding these tax implications, could you clarify what you mean by "reasonable portion" for business use? Like if I work from home 3 days a week but have personal internet usage the other 4 days, how would I calculate what percentage could be reimbursed? Is it based on time, data usage, or just a reasonable estimate? And do different states have guidelines on what they consider "reasonable"? Also, the timing point about switching mid-year is really helpful - we were thinking about implementing this change right away, but it sounds like waiting until January might be smarter from a payroll perspective.

0 coins

StarSeeker

•

Great question about calculating reasonable business use percentages! The IRS doesn't provide a specific formula, but they do expect it to be based on actual business usage rather than just a guess. For your 3-days-in-office scenario, you could reasonably argue that 60% of your internet is business-related (3 out of 5 workdays), but you might also consider that even on office days, you might use internet for work emails, calls, or other business purposes at home. Many companies use a conservative 50% for work-from-home employees to avoid any questions. The key is having a reasonable basis for your calculation and being consistent. Document your reasoning - like "employee works from home 3 days/week plus occasional evening work calls = 60% business use." Time-based calculations are generally more defensible than trying to measure data usage. Regarding state differences, California requires that reimbursements cover "all necessary expenditures" for remote work, which can actually be more generous than federal rules. Other states generally follow federal guidelines but it's worth checking with a local CPA. You're absolutely right about waiting until January - it'll save you headaches with W-2 reporting and make your payroll transitions much cleaner. Plus it gives you time to set up proper documentation processes.

0 coins

Chloe Zhang

•

This has been one of the most comprehensive discussions I've seen on internet stipend vs. reimbursement tax implications! As a small business owner who's been wrestling with this exact issue, I really appreciate everyone sharing their real-world experiences. One thing I'm curious about that hasn't been fully addressed - what about hybrid employees who split time between home and office? We have several team members who come in 2-3 days per week but work from home the rest of the time. They still need home internet for work purposes, but it's not their primary work location. Would the business use percentage calculation be different for these employees compared to fully remote workers? And should we consider having different reimbursement policies for fully remote vs. hybrid employees, or is it simpler to treat everyone the same? Also, for those who've implemented the quarterly submission process - do you have employees submit bills for the entire quarter at once, or do they submit monthly bills quarterly? I'm trying to figure out the most streamlined approach that still meets the IRS documentation requirements. Thanks again to everyone who's shared their expertise here - this thread should be required reading for any business dealing with remote work expenses!

0 coins

Logan Stewart

•

Great questions about hybrid employees! From my experience, the business use percentage for hybrid workers should still be based on actual business usage rather than just office vs. home days. Even if someone is in the office 3 days a week, they likely still use home internet for work purposes on those days too - checking emails before/after office hours, joining calls, accessing work systems, etc. I'd recommend treating hybrid and fully remote employees the same way to keep things simple and avoid any perception of unfairness. A consistent policy is also easier to defend if you're ever audited. Most companies I work with use a standard 50% business use percentage for all remote-capable employees, regardless of how many days they're actually in the office. For the quarterly submission process, I've found it works best to have employees submit their monthly bills all at once at the end of each quarter. So they'd submit January, February, and March bills together in early April. This reduces administrative burden while still providing the monthly documentation the IRS expects. Some companies have employees just submit one representative bill per quarter, but having all three months shows a more consistent business expense pattern. You're absolutely right that this thread has been incredibly informative - it's exactly the kind of practical guidance that's hard to find elsewhere!

0 coins

Yuki Ito

•

This entire discussion has been incredibly eye-opening! I'm a tax preparer and see so many small businesses getting this wrong every tax season. One additional point I'd like to add - make sure you're also considering the impact on your workers' compensation insurance if you switch to reimbursements. Some states include stipends in the calculation of workers' comp premiums because they're treated as wages, but properly structured reimbursements under an accountable plan typically aren't included. This could be another small cost savings to factor into your decision. Also, for anyone implementing this change - don't forget to update your employee handbook and have clear communication about the new process. I've seen employees get confused when their paychecks change, even when it's beneficial to them. A simple explanation showing how the reimbursement approach saves them money on taxes goes a long way toward getting buy-in. One last tip: if you're using payroll software, make sure it can handle accountable plan reimbursements properly. Some basic systems struggle with this and might incorrectly include the reimbursements in taxable wages. It's worth double-checking with your payroll provider before making the switch. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this is exactly the kind of practical, real-world guidance that helps businesses navigate these complex tax rules!

0 coins

NeonNomad

•

This is such a valuable point about workers' compensation insurance that I hadn't considered! As someone new to running a business, there are so many interconnected pieces that I'm still learning about. The communication aspect you mentioned is really important too. I can definitely see how employees might be confused if their paycheck structure changes, even if it saves them money. Do you have any suggestions for how to explain this transition clearly? Like should we show them a before/after comparison of their take-home pay, or focus more on the tax savings aspect? Also, regarding payroll software - are there any specific systems you'd recommend that handle accountable plan reimbursements well? We're currently using a pretty basic solution and I'm wondering if we need to upgrade before making this switch. Thanks for adding yet another layer of practical considerations to think about!

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today