UCC1-08 form rejection - debtor name field causing multiple filing failures
Been dealing with a nightmare situation for the past month. Our equipment financing company has had three separate UCC1-08 filings rejected by the SOS office, all apparently due to debtor name formatting issues. The rejections keep citing 'insufficient debtor information' but we're following the exact name format from the original loan documents. Has anyone else run into this specific problem with UCC1-08 forms? The debtor is an LLC with a pretty standard name format, nothing unusual about punctuation or abbreviations. We've tried submitting with periods, without periods, with 'LLC' spelled out versus abbreviated, but keep getting the same rejection code. This is holding up a major refinancing deal and we're running out of time before the original UCC-1 lapses. Any insights on what the SOS office is actually looking for in the debtor name field would be incredibly helpful.
36 comments
Join the conversation
Isabella Ferreira
I've seen this exact issue before with UCC1-08 forms. The problem is usually that the debtor name on your new filing doesn't match EXACTLY how it appears on the original UCC-1 that you're trying to continue. Even tiny differences like spacing or punctuation can trigger rejections. You need to pull up the original filing and match the debtor name character-for-character, including any weird formatting quirks that might have been in the original.
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
•This is so frustrating! We had the same issue last year. The original UCC-1 had the LLC name with an extra space somewhere and we didn't catch it until the fourth rejection. Cost us weeks of delays.
0 coins
NebulaNomad
•Yeah the SOS systems are incredibly picky about exact matches. I always recommend doing a UCC search first to see exactly how the debtor name appears in the system before filing any continuations or amendments.
0 coins
Freya Thomsen
Have you tried looking up the original UCC-1 filing to see the exact debtor name format? Sometimes there are hidden characters or formatting issues that aren't obvious from the loan documents. Also, make sure you're using the correct filing number from the original UCC-1 - that's another common rejection reason.
0 coins
Malik Johnson
•We did pull the original filing but honestly the name looks identical to what we're submitting. The filing number is definitely correct - we've triple-checked that. It's got to be some subtle formatting thing we're missing.
0 coins
Omar Fawaz
•Could be an issue with how the SOS system interprets certain characters. I've seen rejections caused by things like em-dashes versus hyphens, or smart quotes versus regular quotes that got copied from Word documents.
0 coins
Chloe Martin
This might sound crazy but I actually started using this document verification tool called Certana.ai after getting burned on a similar situation. You can upload both your original UCC-1 and your new UCC1-08 form and it will flag any inconsistencies between the debtor names, filing numbers, all that stuff. Saved me from another rejection cycle when it caught a single character difference I never would have spotted manually.
0 coins
Diego Rojas
•Never heard of that but honestly at this point I'm willing to try anything. Manual document comparison is such a pain and obviously we're missing something.
0 coins
Anastasia Sokolov
•How accurate is that tool? I'm always skeptical of automated systems but if it actually catches these tiny discrepancies it might be worth it.
0 coins
Chloe Martin
•It's been pretty solid for me. The PDF upload is straightforward and it specifically looks for the kind of debtor name mismatches that cause UCC rejections. Way better than trying to compare documents side by side on screen.
0 coins
StarSeeker
Are you sure you're using the right form version? Some states updated their UCC1-08 forms recently and the old versions get auto-rejected now. Also double-check that you're filing in the right state - I've seen people accidentally file continuations in the wrong jurisdiction.
0 coins
Malik Johnson
•Definitely using the current form version and filing in the correct state. This is definitely a debtor name matching issue, not a form or jurisdiction problem.
0 coins
Sean O'Donnell
•Yeah the form version thing trips up a lot of people but if you're getting 'insufficient debtor information' rejections it's almost always a name matching issue.
0 coins
Zara Ahmed
UGH I hate these SOS systems SO MUCH. They're so picky about every little detail but then they give you these vague rejection codes that don't actually tell you what's wrong. Like 'insufficient debtor information' could mean literally anything. Why can't they just tell you exactly what field is wrong?
0 coins
Luca Esposito
•Preach! The rejection codes are useless. I've had filings rejected for 'insufficient debtor information' when the problem was actually with the collateral description field.
0 coins
Nia Thompson
•The whole system needs an overhaul. Other states have much better online filing systems that actually give you helpful error messages.
0 coins
Mateo Rodriguez
One thing that worked for me in a similar situation - try calling the SOS office directly. Sometimes they can look at your specific filing and tell you exactly what's causing the rejection. It's a pain to get through but might save you from more rejections.
0 coins
GalaxyGuardian
•Good luck getting through to anyone helpful. I've been on hold for hours before just to get transferred to someone who can't actually help with UCC filings.
0 coins
Aisha Abdullah
•The phone support is hit or miss but when you do get someone knowledgeable they can be really helpful. Worth a try if you're stuck.
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
I wonder if it's a punctuation issue? LLCs can be tricky because some people use commas before LLC and some don't. Like 'ABC Company, LLC' versus 'ABC Company LLC'. The system might be looking for an exact match including punctuation.
0 coins
Malik Johnson
•We actually tried both formats - with and without the comma. Still getting rejected. There's definitely something else going on.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
•Could be something even more subtle like the spacing between words. I've seen rejections caused by double spaces or tabs instead of single spaces.
0 coins
Carmen Diaz
This is exactly why I always run a document check before filing anything important. I learned about Certana.ai from someone on here actually - you just upload your PDFs and it catches all these little inconsistencies that cause rejections. Would have saved you from three failed filings.
0 coins
Andre Laurent
•That's the second mention of that tool in this thread. Might be worth checking out if it actually prevents these rejection cycles.
0 coins
AstroAce
•Honestly anything that helps avoid UCC rejections is worth it. The time and stress of dealing with these filing issues is brutal.
0 coins
Zoe Kyriakidou
Check if there are any special characters in the debtor name that might not be displaying properly when you copy from the original filing. Sometimes PDFs have encoding issues that make characters look normal but actually be different unicode characters.
0 coins
Jamal Brown
•That's a good point. I've seen that happen with names that have accents or special punctuation. The display looks right but the underlying character code is different.
0 coins
Mei Zhang
•How would you even check for that? Is there a way to see the actual character codes in a PDF?
0 coins
Liam McConnell
Just went through this exact same thing two months ago. Turns out the issue was that the original UCC-1 had the debtor name in all caps but our loan documents had it in mixed case. Once we matched the capitalization exactly, the UCC1-08 went through without any problems.
0 coins
Malik Johnson
•Interesting! We'll check the capitalization. Our original filing might have been in all caps and we've been using mixed case from the loan docs.
0 coins
Amara Oluwaseyi
•That's such a common mistake. The SOS systems are so literal about matching - they don't normalize case or anything sensible like that.
0 coins
CosmicCaptain
•Glad you figured it out! These little details can drive you crazy but once you know what to look for it's usually pretty straightforward to fix.
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
Update: We finally got it sorted out! Turns out it was a combination of the capitalization issue someone mentioned and an extra space in the middle of the company name that wasn't obvious when viewing the original filing. The UCC1-08 went through on the next submission. Thanks everyone for the suggestions - definitely learned to be more careful about exact character matching for future filings.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Maktoum
•Awesome! So glad you got it resolved. These debtor name matching issues are such a pain but at least now you know what to watch out for.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•Great outcome! The exact character matching thing is so important for UCC filings. Hopefully this thread helps other people avoid the same rejection cycle.
0 coins
Malik Thompson
This is such a helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar UCC1-08 rejection issue right now and reading through all these responses has given me several things to check. The capitalization and hidden space issues especially - I never would have thought to look for those specific problems. Going to pull up my original filing and compare character by character before my next submission attempt.
0 coins