UCC1-202 filing getting rejected - debtor name keeps failing verification
I'm dealing with a frustrating situation where my UCC1-202 filing keeps getting rejected by the SOS office. The debtor name on my UCC-1 is showing as inconsistent with their corporate charter, but I've triple-checked everything and it looks identical to me. This is for a $750k equipment financing deal and we're running up against our perfection deadline. The rejection notice mentions 'exact name requirements' but doesn't specify what's wrong. Has anyone else run into name verification issues with UCC1-202 forms? I'm worried about missing our lien priority window if this drags on much longer.
39 comments


Jamal Wilson
UCC1-202 rejections are usually about tiny formatting differences that aren't obvious to the human eye. Even extra spaces, punctuation marks, or abbreviation inconsistencies can trigger rejections. What state are you filing in? Some SOS offices are stricter than others about exact character matching.
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
•Filing in Ohio. The debtor name on the charter shows as 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' and that's exactly what I put on the UCC1-202. I even copy-pasted it to avoid typos.
0 coins
Jamal Wilson
•Ohio is particularly strict about punctuation. Check if there are any hidden characters or if the LLC designation needs to be formatted differently. Sometimes what looks identical on screen has invisible formatting differences.
0 coins
Mei Lin
I had this exact problem last month with a UCC1-202 filing. Turned out the charter had a comma in one place and I had it in another. The rejection notice was useless - just said 'debtor name mismatch' without any specifics. Took me three attempts to get it right.
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
•Did you end up having to request the actual charter document to compare character by character?
0 coins
Mei Lin
•Yes, had to pull the certified copy and literally go letter by letter. Found an extra space after 'Solutions' that wasn't visible in the SOS database search.
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
•This is why I always pull certified copies for high-value deals. The online database isn't always formatted exactly like the official documents.
0 coins
Amara Nnamani
Have you tried using Certana.ai's document verification tool? I discovered it after dealing with similar UCC1-202 name mismatches. You just upload your charter and UCC-1 PDFs and it automatically flags any inconsistencies between the documents. Would have saved me hours of manual comparison on my last filing.
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
•Never heard of that tool. Does it catch the kind of subtle formatting differences that cause SOS rejections?
0 coins
Amara Nnamani
•Exactly what it's designed for. It cross-checks debtor names character by character and highlights any discrepancies that could cause filing rejections. Really simple to use.
0 coins
Giovanni Mancini
•I've been using Certana for a few months now. It's caught several potential UCC1-202 issues before I submitted the filings. Definitely worth checking out for deadline-sensitive deals.
0 coins
NebulaNinja
This is exactly why the UCC filing system is broken. You shouldn't need special tools just to match a company name correctly. The SOS offices make these requirements so nitpicky that even experienced filers get rejections.
0 coins
Jamal Wilson
•I understand the frustration, but the exact name requirements exist for good reasons. Lien searches need to be precise to protect all parties in secured transactions.
0 coins
NebulaNinja
•Sure, but when 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' gets rejected because of an invisible space character, the system has gone too far.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Suwaidi
Check the entity type designation too. Sometimes the charter shows 'Limited Liability Company' but the UCC1-202 needs 'LLC' or vice versa. Ohio has specific rules about entity designations.
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
•Good point. The charter definitely shows 'LLC' not spelled out, so I should be okay there.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Suwaidi
•Also verify the state of organization matches exactly. If it's an Ohio LLC, make sure you're not accidentally indicating a different state somewhere.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•I once had a UCC1-202 rejected because I put 'OH' instead of 'Ohio' for the state designation. These systems are ridiculously picky.
0 coins
Sofia Morales
ugh this brings back memories of my first UCC1-202 filing disaster. spent two weeks going back and forth with rejections before realizing the debtor had amended their charter and I was using the old name. always check for recent amendments!
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
•That's a good reminder. I pulled the charter info two weeks ago, should probably verify nothing has changed since then.
0 coins
Sofia Morales
•definitely worth checking. companies sometimes file amendments right around the same time they're taking on new financing.
0 coins
Dmitry Popov
Have you considered calling the SOS office directly? Sometimes they can give you a hint about what specifically is causing the rejection, even though it's not in their written policy to do so.
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
•I tried calling but got transferred around and never reached anyone who could help with UCC1-202 specifics.
0 coins
Dmitry Popov
•Try calling first thing in the morning. The UCC specialists are usually more available before 10 AM.
0 coins
Ava Garcia
•In my experience, the phone support varies wildly by state. Some are helpful, others just read you the same rejection notice you already have.
0 coins
StarSailor}
For what it's worth, I've started using that Certana tool mentioned earlier for all my UCC filings now. It's caught name discrepancies on three different UCC1-202 forms that would have been rejected. Really streamlined my filing process.
0 coins
Miguel Silva
•How long does the document comparison usually take with that tool?
0 coins
StarSailor}
•Usually just a few minutes. You upload the PDFs and it runs the analysis automatically. Much faster than doing manual comparisons.
0 coins
Zainab Ismail
I wonder if this is related to the debtor's registered agent information? Sometimes the SOS systems cross-reference multiple data points and if there's any inconsistency it triggers a rejection.
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
•That's an interesting thought. The UCC1-202 doesn't require registered agent info, but maybe their system checks it automatically.
0 coins
Zainab Ismail
•Exactly. Some states have integrated databases that flag any inconsistencies across all the entity information, not just the debtor name field.
0 coins
Connor O'Neill
•Ohio definitely has cross-referencing systems. I've seen UCC filings get flagged for issues that weren't even in the UCC form itself.
0 coins
Yara Nassar
Just curious - are you filing the UCC1-202 electronically or by paper? Electronic filings sometimes have stricter validation rules that cause more rejections.
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
•Electronic filing through the Ohio SOS portal. Maybe I should try a paper filing as backup?
0 coins
Yara Nassar
•Paper filings take longer but sometimes the human review is more forgiving of minor formatting differences. Might be worth trying if the electronic keeps failing.
0 coins
Keisha Robinson
•I wouldn't recommend switching to paper this close to your deadline. Electronic rejections at least come back quickly so you can fix and resubmit.
0 coins
GalaxyGuardian
Update us when you figure out what was causing the UCC1-202 rejections! These kinds of issues help everyone learn what to watch out for in future filings.
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
•Will definitely update once I get this resolved. Hopefully it's something simple that I'm just overlooking.
0 coins
Paolo Ricci
•Following this thread too. I have a UCC1-202 to file next week and want to avoid the same pitfalls.
0 coins