< Back to UCC Document Community

Luca Esposito

Need help with FL UCC statement service - filing keeps getting rejected

I'm trying to figure out this FL UCC statement service situation and getting nowhere fast. Been working on a UCC-1 filing for equipment collateral on a $180K construction loan and the SOS portal keeps spitting it back. The debtor name verification is driving me crazy - we have the exact corporate name from the charter documents but something's not matching up in their system. Has anyone dealt with this before? The rejection notices aren't specific enough and I'm worried about missing our perfection window. This is my third attempt and I'm starting to panic about the timeline.

Nia Thompson

•

FL can be tricky with exact name matching. Are you using the exact legal name from the Articles of Incorporation? Even small differences like Inc vs Incorporated or missing commas can cause rejections.

0 coins

Luca Esposito

•

Yes I pulled it directly from Sunbiz but maybe there's a formatting issue I'm missing. The corporate name has several LLC designations and I wonder if that's confusing their system.

0 coins

Nia Thompson

•

That could definitely be it. Multi-entity names with subsidiaries often have parsing issues in automated systems.

0 coins

UGH the FL portal is the WORST for this stuff!! I've had filings rejected for the stupidest reasons. Last month they rejected mine because of a SPACE in the wrong place. A SPACE! These systems are garbage.

0 coins

I feel your pain. Had similar issues last year.

0 coins

It's like they designed the system to fail. Makes you wonder if they want the filing fees from multiple attempts.

0 coins

Check your collateral description too. FL is picky about general vs specific descriptions. If you're doing equipment financing you need to be more detailed than just 'all equipment' - they want serial numbers or at least specific equipment types.

0 coins

Luca Esposito

•

The collateral description is pretty detailed - we listed specific construction equipment with model numbers. Think the issue is really the debtor name.

0 coins

Good that rules that out. Definitely focus on the name matching then.

0 coins

Ethan Wilson

•

I had this exact problem a few months ago with a complex corporate debtor name. What saved me was using Certana.ai's document verification tool - you can upload your charter documents and UCC-1 side by side and it instantly shows you exactly where the name discrepancies are. Caught three subtle differences I never would have found manually. Just upload the PDFs and it does the cross-checking automatically.

0 coins

Luca Esposito

•

That sounds like exactly what I need. Does it work with FL-specific formatting requirements?

0 coins

Ethan Wilson

•

Yes it checks against state requirements. Really easy to use and caught issues I spent hours trying to find manually.

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

Never heard of this but sounds useful for complex filings.

0 coins

Carmen Diaz

•

For FL UCC-1 filings, make sure you're not including any punctuation that's not in the original charter. Florida's system is very literal - if the Articles say 'ABC Company, LLC' but you file 'ABC Company LLC' without the comma, it'll reject. Also check for any 'The' prefixes or 'Inc.' vs 'Incorporated' variations.

0 coins

Luca Esposito

•

This is super helpful. I think there might be a comma issue actually. Going to double-check the exact punctuation.

0 coins

Carmen Diaz

•

That's usually the culprit. The tiniest details matter with these automated systems.

0 coins

Andre Laurent

•

How close are you to your filing deadline? If you're running out of time you might want to consider calling the FL SOS directly. Sometimes they can tell you exactly what's wrong over the phone.

0 coins

Luca Esposito

•

Still have about 10 days but don't want to wait until the last minute. Phone calls are a good backup plan.

0 coins

Andre Laurent

•

Smart thinking. Better to have options than scramble at the deadline.

0 coins

AstroAce

•

FL SOS phone support can be hit or miss but worth trying.

0 coins

I remember when I first started doing UCC filings in FL and got so frustrated with the rejections. Turned out I was overthinking it - the system really just wants character-for-character exact matches. No variations, no interpretations, just exactly what's on file with the state.

0 coins

Luca Esposito

•

That makes sense. I probably need to be more literal in my approach.

0 coins

Exactly. Think like a computer - it can't interpret intent, only match characters.

0 coins

Jamal Brown

•

Wait are you sure you're using the right entity search? FL has different databases and sometimes the Sunbiz results don't match what the UCC system expects. Try searching the UCC database first to see how they have the name formatted.

0 coins

Luca Esposito

•

Oh that's a good point. I was just using Sunbiz directly. Let me check the UCC database.

0 coins

Jamal Brown

•

Yeah that could totally be the disconnect. Different systems sometimes format names slightly differently.

0 coins

Mei Zhang

•

This is why UCC work can be so frustrating - you have to think about system integration issues on top of the legal requirements.

0 coins

Another thought - if this is a subsidiary or affiliate company, make sure you're filing against the actual borrower entity and not the parent company. I've seen that mix-up before especially with construction companies that have multiple related entities.

0 coins

Luca Esposito

•

Good catch. This is definitely the right entity but the corporate structure is complex so worth double-checking.

0 coins

Complex structures always add complications. Worth verifying who actually signed the loan docs.

0 coins

Have you tried reaching out to other lenders who've filed against this same debtor? Sometimes you can search existing UCC filings to see exactly how other creditors formatted the name successfully.

0 coins

Luca Esposito

•

That's brilliant! Let me search existing filings for this company. Should show me the exact format that works.

0 coins

Right, if someone else already figured it out you can just copy their format.

0 coins

CosmicCaptain

•

Smart approach. Why reinvent the wheel when you can see what already worked.

0 coins

UPDATE: Used that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier and found the issue immediately - there was an extra space between two words in my filing that wasn't in the charter. Fixed it and the filing went through perfectly. Thanks everyone!

0 coins

Ethan Wilson

•

Awesome! Glad the document checker worked for you. Those tiny spaces are so hard to catch manually.

0 coins

Luca Esposito

•

Wait that was you who got it working? I was the original poster - think you meant to tag someone else?

0 coins

Oh sorry, got confused with threads. But yeah the Certana thing works great for catching those formatting issues.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today