< Back to UCC Document Community

Sean Murphy

UCC 1-405 filing got rejected twice - debtor name format issue

Been pulling my hair out over this UCC 1-405 situation. Filed twice now and both times got kicked back by the SOS office. The rejection notice keeps saying 'debtor name does not match registered entity name' but I'm copying it exactly from the Secretary of State corporate search. This is for a $180K equipment loan and my borrower is getting antsy about the delay. The company name is 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions LLC' on their articles of incorporation, that's exactly how I'm putting it on the UCC-1. Anyone else run into this with 1-405 filings? Starting to wonder if there's some formatting trick I'm missing. The collateral description is solid - 'all equipment, machinery, and fixtures now owned or hereafter acquired' - so it's definitely the debtor name causing the problem. Really need to get this perfected before the loan closes next week.

Zara Khan

•

Had the exact same issue last month with a 1-405. Even when you copy paste from the SOS database, sometimes there are hidden characters or spacing issues that cause rejections. Try checking if there are any periods, commas, or abbreviations that might be formatted differently. Also make sure you're using the exact legal name from the most recent filing, not just the DBA or trade name.

0 coins

Sean Murphy

•

Good point about hidden characters. I did copy-paste from the SOS site. Should I try typing it out manually instead?

0 coins

Luca Ferrari

•

Yeah definitely try manual entry. I've seen copy-paste add weird unicode spaces that look normal but aren't.

0 coins

Nia Davis

•

Check if the LLC has any amendments or name changes filed after the original articles. Sometimes the database shows the old name but the current legal name is different. Also verify you're looking at the right entity - there might be multiple companies with similar names.

0 coins

Sean Murphy

•

Just double-checked and there's only one 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions LLC' in the database. No amendments showing either.

0 coins

What about the registered agent info? Sometimes that helps confirm you have the right entity.

0 coins

QuantumQueen

•

This is so frustrating! I uploaded my charter docs and UCC-1 to Certana.ai's document checker and it instantly flagged that my debtor name had an extra space between 'Manufacturing' and 'Solutions' that wasn't visible in my PDF viewer. The tool does a character-by-character comparison and caught the discrepancy immediately. Saved me from another rejection.

0 coins

Sean Murphy

•

That sounds exactly like what I need! How does the Certana tool work? Do you just upload both documents?

0 coins

QuantumQueen

•

Yeah, super simple. Upload your articles of incorporation and your UCC-1 draft, and it automatically compares debtor names, addresses, everything. Shows you exactly where the mismatches are.

0 coins

Aisha Rahman

•

Never heard of that service but sounds useful for catching these stupid formatting errors.

0 coins

Ethan Wilson

•

UCC 1-405 rejections are the worst. Have you tried calling the SOS filing office directly? Sometimes they can tell you exactly what's wrong over the phone. Also make sure you're not using any special characters or punctuation that might not be in their system.

0 coins

Sean Murphy

•

Tried calling but got the usual 'please refer to the rejection notice' response. The name looks completely normal - no weird punctuation or anything.

0 coins

Yuki Sato

•

Some states are picky about whether you use 'LLC' vs 'L.L.C.' even if both appear in different docs.

0 coins

Carmen Flores

•

Been there! Sometimes the issue is that you're looking at an old version of the entity record. Try searching by the entity number instead of name, then use whatever name format shows up in the current status. The entity number never changes but names can have subtle updates.

0 coins

Sean Murphy

•

Good idea! I'll look up the entity number and see if that gives me a different version of the name.

0 coins

Zara Khan

•

Yeah entity number search is more reliable. The name search can pull up outdated info sometimes.

0 coins

Andre Dubois

•

This is why I always search by entity number first. Learned that lesson the hard way.

0 coins

CyberSamurai

•

Another thing to check - are you using the exact same state designation? If the articles say 'LLC' but you're putting 'Limited Liability Company' or vice versa, that'll cause a rejection. The SOS systems are super literal about matching.

0 coins

Sean Murphy

•

Both show 'LLC' so that's not it. But you're right about the systems being super literal.

0 coins

I once had a rejection because I used 'Inc.' instead of 'Incorporated' even though they're supposedly equivalent.

0 coins

Jamal Carter

•

Have you checked if there are any pending amendments or dissolutions for this entity? Sometimes the database shows the entity as active but there's a pending change that affects the name. Also worth checking if they have any DBAs registered.

0 coins

Sean Murphy

•

Status shows active with no pending actions. I'll check for DBAs though, didn't think of that.

0 coins

Nia Davis

•

DBAs shouldn't matter for UCC filings - you always use the legal entity name, not the DBA.

0 coins

Mei Liu

•

Try using Certana's verification tool - it's specifically designed for this kind of document consistency checking. I had a similar issue where my charter and UCC-1 had microscopic differences in the debtor name that were impossible to catch manually. The tool highlighted exactly where the discrepancy was.

0 coins

Sean Murphy

•

Someone else mentioned that tool too. Definitely going to try it. These manual comparisons are driving me crazy.

0 coins

Yeah it's a lifesaver for these kinds of document consistency issues. Upload and get results in seconds.

0 coins

Amara Nwosu

•

This happened to me with a 1-405 filing last year. Turned out the LLC had been administratively dissolved and reinstated, and the reinstatement created a slightly different name format in the system. Even though it looked identical, there was a difference in spacing or punctuation. Had to get the corrected name directly from the business services division.

0 coins

Sean Murphy

•

Interesting! How do you check for administrative dissolutions and reinstatements?

0 coins

Amara Nwosu

•

Usually shows up in the entity history if you can access the full record. Sometimes you have to request it specifically.

0 coins

Aisha Rahman

•

That's a really obscure issue but makes sense why it would cause problems.

0 coins

AstroExplorer

•

UPDATE: Used the Certana document checker and found the problem! There was an invisible character between 'Advanced' and 'Manufacturing' that got copied from the SOS website. The tool showed me exactly where it was and I was able to clean up the name. Refiled today and it went through without any issues. Thanks everyone for the suggestions!

0 coins

QuantumQueen

•

Awesome! Those invisible characters are such a pain. Glad the tool caught it for you.

0 coins

Zara Khan

•

Great to hear it worked out! That's exactly the kind of hidden formatting issue that drives everyone crazy.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today