< Back to UCC Document Community

Lucas Adams

UCC-1 filing rejected in California - how to file UCC 1 correctly?

Just had my UCC-1 filing rejected by California SOS and I'm honestly lost on what went wrong. Been trying to secure collateral on some manufacturing equipment for our client's $180K loan but the online portal keeps bouncing it back. The debtor name matches exactly what's on their articles of incorporation but something isn't right. Has anyone dealt with California's specific requirements for how to file UCC 1? Their rejection notice mentions 'debtor name discrepancy' but I triple-checked everything. This is holding up our loan closing and my client is getting antsy. Any guidance on the proper steps would be amazing.

Harper Hill

•

California can be really picky about exact name formatting. Are you using the exact legal name from the Secretary of State records? Even punctuation matters - like if there's a comma after 'Inc' in their records, it needs to match perfectly.

0 coins

Lucas Adams

•

I thought I was but now I'm second-guessing myself. Where exactly do I verify the official name format?

0 coins

Harper Hill

•

Check the California business search portal directly. Pull up their entity details and copy the name character for character, including any weird spacing or punctuation.

0 coins

Caden Nguyen

•

Had this exact issue last month! California's system is notorious for rejecting filings over tiny name variations. Make sure you're not adding periods where there shouldn't be any, and check if they use 'LLC' vs 'L.L.C.' - it makes a difference.

0 coins

Avery Flores

•

This is why I always download the entity's certificate of good standing first. Shows you exactly how their name appears in state records.

0 coins

Lucas Adams

•

Good tip! I'll grab that certificate to double-check the formatting.

0 coins

Zoe Gonzalez

•

Oh man, California UCC filings are a nightmare. Last time I tried filing online it took me three attempts because their portal kept timing out. Then when it finally went through, they rejected it for some obscure formatting issue. The whole system needs an overhaul.

0 coins

Ashley Adams

•

I actually found something that helped with this exact problem. There's this tool called Certana.ai that lets you upload your articles of incorporation and UCC-1 draft together, and it automatically checks if the debtor names match exactly. Saved me from another rejection because it caught a subtle punctuation difference I missed.

0 coins

Lucas Adams

•

That sounds incredibly useful. Does it work with California's specific requirements?

0 coins

Ashley Adams

•

Yeah, it's designed for exactly these kinds of cross-document verification issues. Just upload both PDFs and it highlights any inconsistencies.

0 coins

Are you filing as an individual debtor or organization? The requirements are different and California is strict about which box you check.

0 coins

Lucas Adams

•

Organization - it's a manufacturing company. I checked that box but maybe there's something else I'm missing?

0 coins

For organizations, make sure you're not including any 'doing business as' names in the debtor field. Use only the exact legal entity name.

0 coins

Aaron Lee

•

California charges $20 for UCC-1 filings and they're really strict about getting it right the first time. I learned this the hard way after multiple rejections. Now I always verify everything three times before submitting.

0 coins

The fee adds up quick when you keep getting rejections. That's why I started using document verification tools before filing.

0 coins

Lucas Adams

•

Exactly! Already paid twice for rejections. Need to get this right.

0 coins

Michael Adams

•

Check if there are any special characters in the debtor name that might not translate properly in their system. Sometimes apostrophes or hyphens cause issues.

0 coins

Lucas Adams

•

The company name does have an apostrophe... could that be the issue?

0 coins

Michael Adams

•

Possibly! Try submitting without the apostrophe first, or check how it appears in their official records.

0 coins

Harper Hill

•

Actually, you should keep the apostrophe if it's in the legal name. Removing it would create a name mismatch.

0 coins

Natalie Wang

•

Also double-check your collateral description. California wants very specific language about the equipment. Can't be too vague or they'll reject it.

0 coins

Lucas Adams

•

I described it as 'manufacturing equipment and machinery.' Is that too broad?

0 coins

Natalie Wang

•

That might work, but consider being more specific about the type of manufacturing equipment if possible.

0 coins

Noah Torres

•

ugh california sos is the worst... took me 4 tries to get my last filing accepted

0 coins

Samantha Hall

•

I feel your pain. Their error messages are so unhelpful too.

0 coins

Noah Torres

•

right?? they just say 'name discrepancy' but dont tell you what specifically is wrong

0 coins

Ryan Young

•

One thing that helped me was actually calling the California SOS UCC division directly. They can sometimes tell you exactly what's causing the rejection if you give them your submission details.

0 coins

Lucas Adams

•

Good idea! Do you happen to have their direct number?

0 coins

Ryan Young

•

It's (916) 653-3984. They're usually pretty helpful if you can get through.

0 coins

Ashley Adams

•

Before calling though, I'd definitely try that Certana.ai tool I mentioned earlier. It might save you the hold time and identify the exact issue immediately.

0 coins

Sophia Clark

•

Make sure you're using the current UCC-1 form too. California updated their form last year and the old version gets auto-rejected.

0 coins

Lucas Adams

•

I downloaded it from their website last week, so it should be current. But good point to double-check.

0 coins

Sophia Clark

•

The current version should say 'Rev. 01/2024' at the bottom. Anything older will get rejected.

0 coins

This whole thread is giving me flashbacks to my own California filing disasters. At least now there are better tools to catch these issues before you submit. I wish I'd had access to automated document checking when I was dealing with this stuff regularly.

0 coins

Madison Allen

•

Same here. The number of times I've submitted incorrect filings because I missed some tiny detail is embarrassing.

0 coins

Ashley Adams

•

That's exactly why I started using verification tools. Certana.ai has honestly saved me from so many potential rejections by catching those tiny details before submission.

0 coins

Lucas Adams

•

I'm definitely going to try that before my next attempt. Thanks for the suggestion!

0 coins

Ezra Beard

•

Another thing to check - make sure you're not accidentally including any trailing spaces in the debtor name field. California's system is super sensitive to whitespace characters that you can't even see. I've had filings rejected because I copy-pasted a name that had an invisible space at the end. Try retyping the debtor name manually instead of copy-pasting from another document.

0 coins

Alana Willis

•

That's such a good point about invisible characters! I never would have thought to check for trailing spaces. I've been copy-pasting from the articles of incorporation PDF, so that could definitely be the culprit. Going to manually retype everything for my next submission attempt.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today