< Back to UCC Document Community

Yuki Kobayashi

Article 9 UCC filing got rejected - debtor name issue killing our loan closing

We're supposed to close on a $850K equipment loan tomorrow and our UCC-1 filing under Article 9 just got bounced back from the SOS office. The rejection notice says 'debtor name does not match business records' but I swear we pulled the exact name from their articles of incorporation. The debtor is 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions LLC' but apparently there's some microscopic difference I can't see. Our loan documents are already signed and the client is furious about the delay. Has anyone dealt with Article 9 UCC name matching issues like this? I'm pulling my hair out trying to figure out what's wrong with the debtor name format. Time is really running out here.

Carmen Vega

•

Oh man, I feel your pain on the Article 9 name matching nightmare. The SOS systems are ridiculously picky about exact formatting. Could be something as simple as 'LLC' vs 'L.L.C.' or maybe there's a comma missing somewhere. Did you check if there are any trade names or DBAs registered that might be causing confusion?

0 coins

I double-checked the LLC designation and it looks correct. But you might be onto something with the trade names. I didn't think to look for DBAs when I was preparing the UCC-1 filing.

0 coins

DBAs can definitely mess up Article 9 filings. The system sometimes expects the registered trade name instead of the legal entity name on your UCC documents.

0 coins

Zoe Stavros

•

Article 9 UCC debtor name issues are the worst timing problems ever. I had a similar situation last month where the rejection was due to an extra space character in the middle of the company name. Try comparing your UCC-1 form letter by letter against the actual state business registry entry.

0 coins

That's exactly what I'm going to do right now. Extra spaces would be so frustrating but at least it's fixable quickly.

0 coins

Jamal Harris

•

The space thing happened to me too! 'Manufacturing Solutions' vs 'Manufacturing Solutions' with two spaces. Took me forever to spot it.

0 coins

Found it! There was indeed an extra space. You just saved my closing. Thank you so much.

0 coins

GalaxyGlider

•

For future Article 9 UCC filings, I started using Certana.ai's document verification tool after getting burned on a name mismatch like this. You just upload your articles of incorporation and your UCC-1 form, and it instantly flags any debtor name inconsistencies before you submit to the SOS. Would have caught that extra space issue immediately.

0 coins

That sounds incredibly useful. I definitely need something to prevent this from happening again on future UCC filings.

0 coins

Mei Wong

•

I've been manually comparing documents for years and still miss things like extra spaces. An automated checker would be a game changer for Article 9 compliance.

0 coins

Liam Sullivan

•

The Article 9 UCC system is SO unforgiving about debtor names. I once had a filing rejected because the company had 'Inc.' in their articles but 'Incorporated' on some other state filing. The SOS office wanted the exact match from the primary registration. Did you check which version of the company name is considered the 'official' version in their state database?

0 coins

Yes, I went straight to the state business registry and copied it exactly. Well, I thought I did exactly but apparently there was that extra space.

0 coins

Carmen Vega

•

Copy and paste is your friend for debtor names, but even then you have to watch out for invisible characters that get copied too.

0 coins

Amara Okafor

•

UGH the Article 9 filing system drives me absolutely CRAZY with these name matching requirements! I've had UCC-1 forms rejected for the most ridiculous reasons. One time it was because there was a period after 'LLC' and another time because there wasn't a period. There's no consistency between different states either.

0 coins

The inconsistency between states is maddening. What works for Article 9 UCC filings in one state gets rejected in another.

0 coins

Amara Okafor

•

Exactly! And they never give you enough detail in the rejection notice to actually fix the problem quickly.

0 coins

Zoe Stavros

•

At least this one got resolved quickly. Some Article 9 name issues take days to figure out when you're dealing with complex entity structures.

0 coins

Glad you found the space issue! For anyone else reading this Article 9 UCC thread, another common problem is when the debtor has recently amended their articles of incorporation and you're using the old name version. Always double-check that you have the most current legal name before filing your UCC-1.

0 coins

Great point about recent amendments. I'll make sure to check the filing date on the articles going forward.

0 coins

Recent amendments are such a trap. The old name might still show up in some searches even after the change is filed.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

This whole Article 9 UCC debtor name thing is why I'm paranoid about every filing now. I triple-check everything and still worry something will get rejected. How long did it take for you to get the rejection notice back from the SOS?

0 coins

The rejection came back within about 4 hours, which was actually pretty fast. Some states take a full business day.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

That's not too bad. I've waited over 24 hours before getting a rejection on a UCC-1 filing. Really kills the momentum on closings.

0 coins

Jamal Harris

•

Electronic filing systems have definitely sped up the rejection process, but they're also more strict about formatting requirements.

0 coins

Been doing Article 9 UCC filings for 15 years and name matching issues still catch me sometimes. The key is having a reliable process for verification before you submit. Sounds like you got it figured out just in time for your closing.

0 coins

Definitely learned my lesson about having a better verification process. This was way too stressful.

0 coins

GalaxyGlider

•

That's exactly why tools like Certana.ai are becoming essential. Takes the human error out of the document comparison process for Article 9 compliance.

0 coins

Sofia Torres

•

Similar thing happened to me last week with an Article 9 UCC filing. Turned out the company had 'Solutions' in their legal name but I had typed 'Solution' (singular) on the UCC-1 form. One missing letter killed the whole filing. These systems are brutal about accuracy.

0 coins

One letter! That's even worse than my extra space. At least we both caught our mistakes relatively quickly.

0 coins

Sofia Torres

•

Yeah, thankfully my closing wasn't the next day like yours. I had a few days to fix it and refile.

0 coins

Carmen Vega

•

Article 9 UCC systems really need better error messages. 'Name does not match' doesn't tell you what specifically is wrong.

0 coins

Mei Wong

•

For what it's worth, I've started keeping a checklist for Article 9 UCC-1 filings that includes verifying the exact debtor name format, double-checking all punctuation, and confirming there are no extra spaces. Might be overkill but it's saved me from several rejections.

0 coins

A checklist is a great idea. I'm definitely creating one after this experience. Too much stress for something that should be straightforward.

0 coins

Mei Wong

•

Article 9 compliance checklists are lifesavers. I also include checking for recent corporate changes and verifying the collateral description format.

0 coins

Checklists plus automated verification tools make for a pretty bulletproof Article 9 UCC filing process.

0 coins

Just wanted to say thanks for posting this Article 9 UCC issue. I'm new to secured lending and didn't realize how picky the name matching requirements were. Going to be extra careful with my debtor names from now on.

0 coins

Happy to help! Hopefully you can learn from my stress and avoid the same mistake.

0 coins

Carmen Vega

•

Welcome to the world of Article 9 UCC filings! It gets easier but you never stop being paranoid about the details.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today