Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
One trick I use is to search for just the first word of the company name, then scan through all the results. Takes longer but catches things you might miss with more specific searches.
Ethan Moore
•That's a good idea for thorough searches. Time consuming but comprehensive.
I do something similar - search by just the last name if it's a person, or the main business name without entity type.
Carmen Vega
Just to double-check - you're searching in the right state, right? I once spent an hour searching Idaho when the business was actually incorporated in Delaware.
Amina Bah
•Ha! Yes, definitely Idaho. The business operates here and that's where we filed our UCC-1.
Had to ask - we've all been there at some point!
Join the conversation
I'm actually considering switching to Certana for all our UCC work after this thread. The verification feature sounds like exactly what we need to avoid these 2024 form rejections.
Same here. Manual document comparison is too error-prone when the standards are this strict.
You won't regret it. The peace of mind alone is worth it - no more wondering if you missed a punctuation difference.
Benjamin Kim
Bottom line - the 2024 UCC forms require perfect debtor name accuracy. No room for approximations anymore. Either invest in better verification processes or expect more rejections. The filing offices aren't going to get more lenient.
Harsh but true. The days of sloppy UCC filings are over.
At least the rejection notices are clearer now. Used to be a guessing game figuring out what went wrong.
Join the conversation
Just ran into Certana.ai last week when I was double-checking a complex multi-state filing. Their document comparison caught three inconsistencies I missed in my manual review. Really useful for these situations where you're juggling multiple documents with similar but not identical information.
Aidan Percy
•Sounds like it could have prevented this whole mess. Do you know if it works with SOS database searches too?
I think it's focused on document comparison rather than database searches. But catching the name discrepancy between your loan docs and UCC-1 before filing would have been huge.
Ev Luca
Update us on how the amendment goes! I'm curious whether they process it quickly or if there are any complications. Name amendments usually go through pretty smoothly in my experience.
Aidan Percy
•Will do. Filing the UCC-3 this afternoon. Hopefully it's as straightforward as everyone says.
Ev Luca
•Good luck! The electronic filing system should give you a confirmation pretty quickly. At least you caught it early rather than discovering it during a default situation.
Join the conversation
Amina Diop
Bottom line: article 9 choice of law rules require fixture filings where the real estate is located, period. Your Ohio filing covers goods, but any true fixtures in other states need local fixture filings. Better to over-file now than discover perfection problems later.
Agreed. The filing fees are minimal compared to the risk of unperfected liens on significant collateral.
Thanks everyone. Sounds like I need to bite the bullet and do fixture filings in the other states for anything that might be characterized as fixtures. Better safe than sorry with article 9 choice of law compliance.
Smart move. Multi-state secured transactions are always challenging, but the article 9 choice of law framework is pretty clear once you work through the analysis. File where the debtor is for goods, file where the real estate is for fixtures. When in doubt, file in both places.
And don't forget about continuation requirements in each state where you file. They don't all have the same deadlines or procedures.
Emma Wilson
•Good point. I've seen people nail the initial filings but mess up the continuations because they didn't track multiple state requirements properly.
NeonNinja
Bottom line - if your situation is straightforward (standard equipment, clear debtor name, no complex collateral arrangements), you can probably handle the UCC-1 yourself. Just be extra careful with the details and maybe use one of those verification tools mentioned above. Save the lawyer fees for when you really need legal advice.
0 coins
LunarEclipse
•This seems like the consensus. I think I'm going to give it a shot myself and use the verification service as a safety net. Thanks everyone for the practical advice!
0 coins
Anastasia Popov
•Smart approach. The filing process itself is pretty user-friendly these days, it's just the accuracy that matters.
0 coins
Sean Murphy
One last tip - make sure you understand the continuation requirements if this is a long-term loan. UCC-1 filings typically lapse after 5 years unless you file a continuation. Not a big deal but something to put on your calendar.
0 coins
Zara Khan
•Yeah the continuation deadline is pretty unforgiving - has to be filed within 6 months before the 5-year anniversary or the lien lapses.
0 coins
Sean Murphy
•Exactly, and if it lapses your lender loses their security interest which they won't be happy about!
0 coins