< Back to UCC Document Community

Andre Moreau

Best UCC search companies for due diligence - which ones actually catch everything?

I'm working on a commercial loan package and need to run comprehensive UCC searches across multiple states. The borrower has operations in 6 different states and I want to make sure we're not missing any existing liens before we file our UCC-1. My usual search company missed a critical filing last year that almost killed a deal, so I'm looking for recommendations on UCC search companies that are actually thorough. Anyone have experience with companies that do multi-state searches and catch those tricky variations in debtor names? I need someone who can handle both individual and corporate debtor searches and won't miss filings just because there's a slight name variation or they're filed under a related entity. Time is a factor here - need results within 48 hours if possible.

Zoe Stavros

•

I've been using three different search companies and honestly the quality varies dramatically. Some only search exact matches which is useless when you're dealing with corporations that might have filed under slightly different names. What states are you searching? Some state systems are more reliable than others.

0 coins

Andre Moreau

•

Need searches in TX, CA, FL, NY, IL, and DE. The borrower has subsidiaries and I'm worried about cross-collateralization issues.

0 coins

Jamal Harris

•

DE is notorious for having filings under holding company names that don't match the operating entity. You definitely need someone who knows to search variations.

0 coins

Mei Chen

•

I had a similar issue last month where our search company completely missed a UCC-1 that was filed under the debtor's DBA name instead of their legal entity name. Cost us two weeks of delays when we discovered it during our own verification process. Now I always double-check their work with Certana.ai's document verification tool - you can upload your UCC searches and it'll cross-reference everything to make sure nothing was missed.

0 coins

Liam Sullivan

•

Wait, how does that verification tool work exactly? Can it catch things the search companies miss?

0 coins

Mei Chen

•

Yeah, you just upload the search results PDFs and it automatically checks for name variations, related entities, and filing inconsistencies. Saved me from missing a critical lien that would have messed up our priority position.

0 coins

Amara Okafor

•

That sounds too good to be true. Most of these verification services are just expensive ways to do what you should be doing manually anyway.

0 coins

Been doing commercial lending for 15 years and I've seen search companies miss obvious filings because they don't understand the business context. You need someone who searches not just the exact debtor name but also looks for parent companies, subsidiaries, and common variations. Also make sure they're checking both individual and corporate debtor indexes if there are personal guarantees involved.

0 coins

This is exactly why I stopped trusting search companies completely. Now I run my own searches through each state's online portal plus use a service for verification.

0 coins

Running your own searches is fine for simple deals but when you've got complex corporate structures across multiple states it becomes a nightmare. Need professionals who understand the nuances.

0 coins

Agreed. The key is finding search companies that actually understand secured transactions, not just data entry clerks running basic name searches.

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

Whatever search company you use, make sure they provide detailed methodology reports. I always request copies of the actual search screens they used and verify they checked all reasonable name variations. Too many companies just run one search and call it done.

0 coins

Sofia Ramirez

•

Good point about methodology reports. I also require them to provide the search date and time stamps so I can verify they searched close to when I requested it.

0 coins

Dmitry Volkov

•

Has anyone dealt with search companies that refuse to provide their search methodology? That's always a red flag for me.

0 coins

StarSeeker

•

I've used probably a dozen different UCC search companies over the years and the quality is all over the place. Some are great for simple searches but fall apart when you need complex multi-state work. Others are expensive but worth it for complicated deals. Really depends on your specific needs and budget.

0 coins

Ava Martinez

•

Can you recommend specific companies? I'm tired of playing guessing games with search quality.

0 coins

StarSeeker

•

I'd rather not name specific companies publicly, but feel free to message me directly. Quality can change when companies get bought out or change personnel.

0 coins

Miguel Ortiz

•

This is frustrating - everyone talks about good and bad search companies but nobody wants to share actual names.

0 coins

Zainab Omar

•

Just went through this exact situation last week. Ended up using two different search companies and comparing results. Found discrepancies between them which led me to discover they were using different search methodologies. One was only searching active filings, the other included recently terminated ones. Always specify exactly what you want searched.

0 coins

Connor Murphy

•

That's a good strategy - using multiple companies. Expensive but probably worth it for large deals.

0 coins

Yara Sayegh

•

Why would you need recently terminated filings? Once they're terminated they shouldn't affect your priority position.

0 coins

Zainab Omar

•

Sometimes terminations are filed incorrectly or there are disputes about whether they're effective. Better to know what was there historically.

0 coins

NebulaNova

•

The real problem with UCC search companies is they don't understand the business implications of what they're searching for. They treat it like a data entry job instead of understanding that missing a filing could cost someone millions. You need companies that employ actual paralegals or legal professionals, not just clerks.

0 coins

Exactly! I've had search companies tell me there were no filings when a 30-second search on the state website showed multiple active UCC-1s.

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

That's inexcusable. At minimum they should be able to replicate what you can do yourself on the state portals.

0 coins

Amina Diallo

•

I started using Certana.ai to verify my search results after having similar issues. Upload the search reports and it flags anything that looks inconsistent or incomplete.

0 coins

Oliver Schulz

•

Here's what I learned from a bad experience: always request that the search company provide screenshots of their actual searches, not just summary reports. Found out one company was only searching one variation of the debtor name despite being paid for comprehensive searches. Screenshots don't lie.

0 coins

Screenshots are a great idea. Also ask for the specific search terms they used and any filters they applied.

0 coins

Some states have really clunky search interfaces. Wonder if that affects search quality from these companies.

0 coins

Oliver Schulz

•

Definitely affects it. Companies that are experienced with specific state systems are usually more thorough than ones trying to do searches in unfamiliar states.

0 coins

For multi-state searches I always factor in extra time for verification. Even the best search companies can miss things, especially when you're dealing with corporate entities that might have filed under different names or structures. Built in an extra week to my timeline just for search verification and it's saved me multiple times.

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

Extra time is smart but not always possible when you're under closing pressure. Sometimes you just have to trust the search company and hope for the best.

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

That's a dangerous approach. Better to push back on closing timelines than risk missing a critical lien.

0 coins

Update for anyone following this thread - ended up using two different search companies and cross-referencing with Certana.ai's verification tool. Found three filings that one company missed and one that both companies missed. The verification tool caught the discrepancies by comparing the search results against the actual state databases. Definitely worth the extra step for complex deals like this.

0 coins

Ravi Gupta

•

Glad you found a solution that worked. Which search companies did you end up using?

0 coins

GalacticGuru

•

How much did the verification tool cost compared to just running duplicate searches?

0 coins

Can't share company names publicly but the verification step was definitely cost-effective compared to the potential problems from missed filings. Worth it for peace of mind.

0 coins

Mateo Warren

•

I've been burned by inadequate UCC searches too many times to count. One thing I always insist on now is getting a detailed search strategy upfront - which name variations they'll search, what date ranges they're covering, and whether they're checking both individual and corporate debtor indexes. Also learned to specifically ask them to search for any DBAs or trade names associated with the entity. The number of times filings are made under a company's "doing business as" name instead of their legal entity name is shocking. For your 6-state search, I'd also recommend asking each company how they handle cross-state entity relationships - some are better than others at identifying when a Delaware holding company has subsidiaries filing UCCs in other states.

0 coins

This is really comprehensive advice, especially about the DBA searches. I've seen so many deals get complicated because filings were under trade names that nobody thought to check. The cross-state entity relationship point is huge too - I had a deal where the parent company in Delaware had filed a blanket lien that covered assets of subsidiaries in three other states, but it wasn't obvious from the subsidiary searches alone.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today