Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
As someone who's dealt with similar entity name verification challenges in M&A transactions, I'd strongly recommend implementing a dual-track approach while you're under time pressure. First, engage a professional UCC search firm immediately to run comprehensive searches using all possible name variations - they have access to proprietary databases and search logic that can catch filings you might miss. Simultaneously, use the automated document verification tools like Certana that others have mentioned to quickly analyze the filings you've already found for patterns and inconsistencies. Given your month-long closing timeline, you need to move fast but can't afford to miss anything. Also consider reaching out to your target company's current counsel or accountant - they might have institutional knowledge about historical entity restructurings or name changes that could explain the CHTD variations. The key is documenting your search methodology thoroughly so you can defend your due diligence process regardless of what you ultimately discover about these liens.
This dual-track approach sounds like exactly what's needed for Connor's tight timeline! The combination of professional search firms and automated verification tools should catch anything that might slip through a single methodology. Your point about reaching out to the target's current counsel is particularly smart - they probably have the most direct access to historical entity information that could resolve these CHTD variations quickly. Given all the complexity discussed in this thread, having that professional backup while using the verification tools for speed seems like the best risk management strategy when you're up against a closing deadline.
This has been an incredibly comprehensive discussion on UCC debtor name verification! As someone new to this area of due diligence, I'm struck by how systematic the approach needs to be. The combination of automated verification tools, professional search services, and thorough documentation creates a solid framework for handling these complex situations. One additional consideration I'd add is checking whether your target company has any foreign subsidiaries or operations - sometimes parent companies file UCCs using abbreviated names that don't match the exact legal entity structure. Also, if CHTD is an acronym, it might be worth checking industry-specific databases or trade publications to see if you can identify what it stands for in your particular sector. The timeline matrix approach and multi-state search strategy discussed here seem essential for any complex entity verification. Thanks to everyone for sharing such detailed practical guidance - this thread should be required reading for anyone doing M&A due diligence!
Join the conversation
Bottom line: file ASAP but file correctly. I'd rather see someone take an extra few days to verify everything is perfect than rush and make mistakes. A rejected UCC-1 is worse than a slightly delayed one.
Thanks everyone. Going to double-check everything tomorrow and file by end of week. Feel much better about the timeline now.
Smart approach. That verification tool I mentioned earlier really does help catch issues before filing if you want to check it out.
For equipment financing in Ohio, you generally want to file within 10-15 business days of closing to be safe. The key is balancing speed with accuracy - rushing and making errors can invalidate your security interest entirely. Since your loan docs say "promptly file," I'd interpret that as within 2 weeks maximum. Make sure to verify the debtor name exactly matches your Secretary of State records before submitting. With a $180K loan, it's worth taking an extra day or two to triple-check everything rather than risk a rejection that could cost you your priority position.
This is really helpful advice, especially about the 2-week timeframe for "promptly file." I'm new to UCC filings and wasn't sure how to interpret that language. One quick question - you mentioned verifying the debtor name against Secretary of State records. Is there a specific way to search for this, or do I just look up the company on the Ohio SOS website? Want to make sure I'm checking the right database before I file.
Join the conversation
I'm new to this community but this thread has been incredibly helpful as I'm facing a nearly identical situation! We had Sunrun panels removed 6 weeks ago after paying off the loan, and they keep telling me "someone will get back to you" about the UCC termination. Reading all the advice here about UCC §9-513 and §9-625, executive escalation, and getting the title company involved has given me a clear action plan. The name matching issue is particularly concerning - our original UCC-1 shows our business name with "Co." instead of "Company" which could definitely cause problems. I'm going to do a UCC search tomorrow to confirm the exact debtor name, then send Sunrun a certified letter with a 15-day deadline referencing their legal obligations. Has anyone here dealt specifically with Sunrun's executive escalation process? I'm wondering if they have a dedicated UCC compliance department or if I should go straight to their legal team. Also planning to loop in our title company since we're looking to sell next quarter - better to get ahead of this now rather than have it become a closing issue later.
Welcome to the community! Your situation sounds frustratingly familiar - Sunrun seems to be just as bad as the other solar companies when it comes to UCC cleanup. The "Co." vs "Company" name variation you mentioned is exactly the type of issue that will cause a rejection, so you're smart to get ahead of it with the UCC search. For Sunrun's executive escalation, try searching their website for "executive customer relations" or call their main corporate line and ask specifically for "executive escalations" or "C-suite customer service." You can also try reaching out on LinkedIn to their VP of Customer Experience or similar executives - sometimes a professional message outlining the UCC compliance issue and referencing the specific code sections gets faster attention than going through normal channels. The 15-day deadline sounds reasonable given your timeline. Definitely get that title company involved early - they have much more leverage with these solar companies than individual property owners, and since you're planning to sell next quarter, having this resolved now will save you major headaches at closing. Document everything in case you need to escalate to regulatory complaints later!
I'm new to this community but going through something very similar right now! We removed our SunPower system 4 weeks ago and they're giving me the exact same runaround about the UCC termination. Reading through all these responses has been incredibly educational - I had no idea about UCC §9-513 and the potential for statutory damages under §9-625. The name matching issue everyone's discussing is really concerning me too since our original filing shows slight variations in how our LLC name is formatted. I'm definitely going to do a UCC search immediately and then try the executive escalation approach with specific legal code references. The advice about getting the title company involved proactively is brilliant - I was planning to wait until we actually needed to refinance but it makes total sense to get them engaged now while there's still time to resolve any issues. Has anyone had experience with SunPower specifically on UCC terminations? Their customer service structure seems particularly disorganized and I'm wondering if they have any known escalation paths that work better than others.
Welcome to the community! I haven't dealt with SunPower specifically, but from what I've seen with other solar companies, the executive escalation approach tends to work across the board. For SunPower, try searching for "SunPower executive customer service" or "SunPower president office" on their website. You can also call their main corporate line and ask to be transferred to "executive escalations" - be specific about UCC compliance issues and mention UCC §9-513. The LinkedIn approach often works well too - find their VP of Customer Relations or similar executive and send a professional message referencing your UCC termination issue and the legal requirements. The key is being specific about the code sections and your timeline. Since you mentioned the name formatting variations, definitely prioritize that UCC search to see exactly how your LLC appears on file. And yes, getting your title company involved early is smart - they have established relationships and can often cut through the customer service maze much faster than individual property owners.
Join the conversation
As someone new to this community and working in financial compliance, this thread has been absolutely invaluable! The way everyone has explained the relationship between liens, security interests, and UCC filings has really clarified what had been a confusing topic for me. I'm particularly grateful for the practical audit advice - starting with internal loan documentation and then working outward to public filings makes so much more sense than trying to reverse-engineer everything from UCC searches. One thing I'm wondering about: when you're dealing with equipment that might be considered "fixtures" (like HVAC systems or built-in machinery), how do you determine whether these should be captured in your UCC filing audit or your real estate lien review? It seems like there could be some gray area where equipment is attached enough to real property that it might be covered by a mortgage rather than requiring separate UCC perfection. Has anyone encountered this situation in their audits?
@StormChaser and @NeonNebula this fixture issue is something I just dealt with in our manufacturing facility audit! We had custom-installed production equipment that was bolted to concrete foundations, and it turned out our equipment lender had filed both a regular UCC-1 AND a fixture filing in the county real estate records. The fixture filing specifically described the equipment and referenced our building's legal description. What made it confusing was that our mortgage lender ALSO claimed the equipment as part of the real estate collateral. We ended up needing legal counsel to sort out the priority between the two liens, but the key lesson was that fixture filings bridge both worlds - they're UCC filings but they get recorded with the real estate records. For your audit, definitely check county records for any fixture filings in addition to your state UCC searches, especially if you have manufacturing or specialized equipment that's permanently installed.
@StormChaser this is such an important distinction that often gets overlooked in security interest audits! From my experience, the fixture determination can be highly fact-specific and sometimes even varies by state law. I've found it helpful to create a separate "Potential Fixtures" category in my audit tracking when I encounter equipment that could arguably fall into either category. Things like elevators, specialized lighting systems, and even some types of industrial ovens can be tricky to categorize. One practical tip: look for language in your loan documents that specifically addresses whether certain equipment is intended to remain personal property or become part of the real estate - sophisticated lenders often include "non-fixture" clauses to preserve their UCC security interests. Also, don't forget that fixture filings have their own continuation requirements separate from regular UCC filings, so they need to be tracked in your renewal schedule as well. The key is documenting your reasoning for each categorization so your CFO understands why certain items might appear in multiple places.
As a newcomer to this community, I'm amazed by the depth of knowledge everyone has shared here! This thread has been like a masterclass in security interests. I'm just starting my career in corporate finance and was completely overwhelmed when my supervisor asked me to help with due diligence on a potential acquisition - suddenly I'm seeing UCC filings, mortgage documents, and various lien references everywhere. The way you've all broken down how these concepts work together has been incredibly helpful. One thing I'm still wrapping my head around: when conducting due diligence on another company, is it standard practice to run UCC searches on all their entity names and subsidiaries? And should I be concerned if I find UCC filings that seem to cover "all assets" versus more specific collateral descriptions? I'm trying to understand what red flags to watch for versus what's normal business practice. Thank you all for creating such a welcoming learning environment for newcomers!
@StarStrider welcome to both the community and the world of M&A due diligence! @Ashley and @Malik have given you excellent guidance. I'd add one more layer to consider - when you're reviewing those UCC filings during due diligence, also pay attention to the secured party information. Sometimes you'll find filings where the secured party has changed (due to loan assignments or bank mergers) but the UCC records might not reflect current ownership. This can complicate deal negotiations if you can't easily identify who actually holds the security interests. Also, don't overlook UCC-3 amendments - they can tell a story about how the company's borrowing relationships have evolved, collateral has been released or added, or whether there have been defaults that required modifications. One practical tip: create a simple matrix matching each UCC filing to the corresponding debt disclosed in their financial statements - any mismatches deserve follow-up questions. The fact that you're thinking about red flags versus normal practice shows you're developing the right analytical mindset for this work!
@StarStrider welcome to the community! As someone who recently navigated my first M&A due diligence project, I completely understand that overwhelming feeling when you're suddenly immersed in all these different types of security filings. One thing that really helped me was creating a simple checklist for each target entity: 1) Run UCC searches under exact legal name and variations, 2) Check for any DBAs or former names, 3) Search subsidiaries separately, 4) Cross-reference findings with disclosed debt schedules. Regarding those broad "all assets" UCC filings - @Ashley is absolutely right that they're standard practice. What I learned to focus on is whether the collateral description makes sense for the business type and whether it matches what's described in their loan agreements. For example, if you see a filing covering "inventory" but the target is a pure service business, that might warrant a follow-up question. Also, don't forget to note expiration dates - UCC filings that are close to lapsing could create urgent action items for the acquiring company post-closing. The learning process is intense but you're asking all the right questions!
Luca Russo
Don't forget about fixture filings if any of your UCC-1s are filed in the real estate records. Those assignment procedures might be different from regular UCC-3 assignments filed with the Secretary of State. You'll need to check with the county recorder's office for their specific requirements.
0 coins
Paolo Marino
•We do have about 15 fixture filings in our portfolio. I didn't even think about those having different assignment procedures. Thanks for the heads up!
0 coins
Amina Bah
•Fixture filing assignments can be tricky because they're governed by both UCC rules and local recording requirements. Definitely worth double-checking the procedures with each county.
0 coins
Victoria Stark
As someone new to UCC administration, this thread has been incredibly educational! I'm currently working on a smaller assignment project (about 25 filings) and I'm wondering about the typical cost structure for UCC-3 assignments. Are there any standard filing fees I should budget for, and do most states charge per assignment or have bulk discount options? Also, for those who mentioned using electronic filing systems - are there any states that still require paper filings for assignments? I want to make sure I'm not caught off guard by any unexpected requirements or costs during our process.
0 coins
Kylo Ren
•Great questions! Filing fees vary by state but typically range from $10-25 per UCC-3 assignment. Most states don't offer bulk discounts unfortunately - you pay per filing. For 25 assignments, budget around $250-625 in filing fees. Almost all states now accept electronic filings for UCC-3 assignments, which is much faster than paper. I think only a few counties in rural areas still require paper for fixture filings. Check your Secretary of State website - they usually have a fee schedule and filing options listed. Electronic filing also gives you instant confirmation numbers which is helpful for tracking.
0 coins
Micah Trail
•Welcome to UCC administration! @edb4720500e7 covered the basics well. One additional tip for your 25 filings - create a simple tracking spreadsheet before you start with columns for original filing number, debtor name, assignment filing date, and confirmation number. This will save you headaches later when you need to provide documentation. Also, if you're working with fixture filings, call the county recorder's office ahead of time to confirm their assignment procedures. Some counties have specific forms or additional documentation requirements beyond the standard UCC-3. Good luck with your project!
0 coins