Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Thanks everyone for the detailed responses! This has been incredibly helpful. I'm definitely going to file well before closing - sounds like that's the consensus for avoiding priority issues. One follow-up question: for the $180k equipment loan I mentioned, should I be concerned about any UCC search requirements? I know buyers typically do UCC searches during due diligence, but as the lender, do I need to search for existing liens before I file my UCC-1? I want to make sure I understand what liens might already be on this equipment and how that affects my position.
Absolutely do a UCC search before filing! You need to know what liens already exist and their priority dates. If there are existing equipment liens from other lenders, you might be in second position which affects your risk and loan terms. Most title companies or legal service providers can run comprehensive UCC searches for around $50-100. Also search for tax liens and judgments that could take priority. Better to know the full picture upfront than get surprised later.
Eli Wang
Great thread! As someone who's been burned by UCC filing mistakes before, I want to emphasize the importance of timing and coordination with your loan documentation. Make sure your security agreement and UCC-1 collateral descriptions are consistent - I've seen deals where the security agreement described "manufacturing equipment located at [specific address]" but the UCC-1 just said "equipment" which created confusion during enforcement. Also, if you're doing the filing yourself, consider using the state's UCC forms rather than generic ones - some states have specific formatting requirements that aren't obvious. For your LLC debtor name issue, definitely pull the entity info directly from the Secretary of State database the same day you're filing, since business status can change quickly. Good luck with your first UCC filing!
Join the conversation
Emma Garcia
I want to circle back to the original question about impact on equipment financing. I work with equipment lenders regularly and most of them are comfortable with existing SBA liens as long as they can file their own UCC-1 for the specific equipment being financed. The key is full disclosure upfront and having clean documentation. Don't try to hide the existing lien - that will backfire every time.
Emma Garcia
•Correct. The equipment lender's UCC-1 would be more specific - it would list the exact equipment as collateral. In case of default, they'd have first claim on that specific equipment while SBA maintains their broader lien on other business assets. It's called a purchase money security interest and it can have priority even over earlier blanket liens in some cases.
Nia Thompson
•That's a great explanation of PMSI rules. Equipment financing is one of the few areas where you can still get decent terms even with existing UCC liens, precisely because of the purchase money security interest provisions.
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation where my EIDL UCC lien is complicating a working capital line of credit application. Reading through everyone's experiences, it sounds like equipment financing is more achievable than general business credit lines when you have an existing SBA blanket lien. I'm curious - has anyone successfully negotiated with their existing bank to modify credit terms after an EIDL UCC lien appeared? My relationship manager seemed caught off guard when the lien showed up during their annual review, and now they're requiring additional collateral for my existing line of credit. Wondering if it's worth shopping around for a new banking relationship or trying to work with my current bank to find a solution.
I'd recommend trying to work with your current bank first since you already have an established relationship. Banks often get nervous when they discover liens they weren't aware of, but if you can provide clear documentation showing the EIDL terms and demonstrate that your business performance hasn't changed, they might be willing to adjust rather than lose a good customer. However, if they're being unreasonable about additional collateral requirements, shopping around could give you leverage in negotiations. Some banks are more SBA-savvy than others and understand how to work with existing government liens.
I went through something similar with my business line of credit after my EIDL UCC lien showed up. My bank initially wanted to reduce my credit limit by 40% and add personal guarantees from my spouse. I ended up providing them with a detailed financial package showing my business performance since getting the EIDL, plus copies of all the SBA documentation. After their credit committee reviewed everything, they agreed to keep my existing terms but added a covenant requiring me to maintain certain debt service coverage ratios. It took about 6 weeks to resolve, but staying with my existing bank was worth it since they knew my payment history. The key was being proactive and transparent rather than letting them discover issues during their own review process.
Join the conversation
As someone new to both this community and UCC filings, I'm grateful for all the detailed insights shared here! I'm about to start handling secured transactions for a regional bank and this thread has completely changed my understanding of UCC fee structures. I was naively thinking it would just be the basic state filing fees, but clearly there's a whole ecosystem of potential costs I need to plan for. The rejection fee stories are particularly sobering - it sounds like getting the debtor information exactly right is critical. I'm curious about the learning curve here: for those who started from scratch like I'm doing, how long did it typically take you to feel confident with the filing process and avoid costly mistakes? Also, are there any professional organizations or continuing education resources you'd recommend for staying sharp on UCC best practices and regulatory changes? The equipment financing business we're expanding into will likely involve filings across multiple states, so I want to make sure I'm as prepared as possible before jumping in.
Emma Davis
•@Gabriel Freeman, welcome! The learning curve varies but expect 3-6 months to feel comfortable and a full year to feel truly confident. I'd add to @Zane Gray's excellent suggestions - consider starting with a UCC mentor or finding an experienced paralegal who can review your first several filings before submission. Many law firms offer consulting arrangements for this. Also, create your own state-specific checklists as you learn each jurisdiction's quirks - it becomes invaluable reference material. For multi-state work, I actually keep a simple spreadsheet tracking fee structures, filing deadlines, and unique requirements for each state I work in regularly. The upfront time investment in documentation and systems will pay huge dividends as your volume increases. Don't be afraid to start slow and methodical - better to handle 5 perfect filings than 20 problematic ones!
Welcome @Gabriel Freeman! As someone who also started from zero in UCC filings about two years ago, I can tell you the learning curve is definitely real but manageable. It took me about 4-5 months to stop second-guessing every filing, and honestly I still occasionally discover new state-specific quirks that surprise me. One thing that really helped was creating a "lessons learned" log after each filing - especially any mistakes or close calls. For professional development, beyond what @Zane Gray mentioned, I'd also suggest following the Uniform Law Commission's updates on Article 9 revisions. They periodically publish guidance that can save you from common pitfalls. Since you're going multi-state with equipment financing, definitely invest in a good UCC reference guide or subscription service - the state-by-state variations in collateral description requirements and debtor name formats can be tricky. The main thing is don't let the complexity intimidate you - everyone in this community started somewhere, and the fact that you're asking these questions upfront shows you're already thinking like a pro!
As a newcomer to this community, I'm blown away by how comprehensive and helpful this discussion has been! I'm just starting to handle UCC filings for a mid-sized factoring company and honestly thought I had a decent grasp on the costs until reading through all these experiences. The reality check on rejection fees and hidden costs is sobering - I was definitely underestimating the true expense. What strikes me most is how document accuracy seems to be the make-or-break factor for avoiding costly mistakes. I'm particularly intrigued by the automated verification tools mentioned throughout this thread. For someone handling 20-30 filings per month across various states, it sounds like the upfront investment in something like Certana could quickly pay for itself in avoided rejection and amendment fees. One question for the group: when you're onboarding new clients who may have existing UCC filings from previous lenders, what's your typical budget allocation for the initial search and cleanup work? I'm trying to build realistic fee estimates for our client proposals and want to make sure I'm not lowballing the discovery phase costs.
Join the conversation
LongPeri
I've been through this exact situation and it's frustrating how unclear the SOS portals are about what "inactive" actually means. Here's what I learned: the key is to look at the timeline and filing history. If your UCC-1 was filed in 2020 and it's now 2025, you're right at the 5-year mark where automatic lapse would occur. But since you mentioned the loan was paid off last year, the lender should have filed a UCC-3 termination statement. Log into your state's UCC portal and search for your filing number - look specifically for any UCC-3 documents. If you see one filed by your lender after your payoff date, it was properly terminated. If there's no UCC-3 on record, it likely just lapsed. Either way, the lien is gone, but having a termination statement gives you better documentation if you ever need to prove the release.
Dylan Cooper
•This is really helpful! I'm new to understanding UCC filings and this timeline approach makes a lot of sense. So if I'm reading this right, even though both lapse and termination result in an "inactive" status, the termination gives you that paper trail showing the lender actually released their interest when the loan was paid off, rather than just waiting for the automatic expiration? That seems like it would be important for future reference.
As someone new to this community, this thread has been incredibly educational! I had no idea there was such a significant difference between UCC lapse and termination. From reading everyone's experiences, it sounds like the main takeaway is that while both result in an "inactive" status, termination provides proper documentation that the lender actively released their security interest when the debt was satisfied. For someone like @Leeann Blackstein who paid off their loan, having that UCC-3 termination statement seems much more valuable than just relying on automatic lapse. It's frustrating that the SOS portals don't make this distinction clearer - they really should show "LAPSED" vs "TERMINATED" instead of just "inactive." Thanks to everyone who shared their knowledge here, especially the practical tips about checking the filing history section and looking for actual UCC-3 documents rather than just assuming what "inactive" means.
Welcome to the community! You've summarized this perfectly - that's exactly the key distinction everyone has been highlighting. As a newcomer myself, I found it really eye-opening how much confusion this "inactive" status creates. Your suggestion about the SOS portals showing "LAPSED" vs "TERMINATED" is brilliant - that would save so many people the headache of digging through filing histories just to understand what actually happened to their UCC. It's clear from all these responses that while the legal effect might be similar, having that UCC-3 termination document makes a huge practical difference for documentation purposes.
ChosenX
No worries, just amend it.
1 coin
Luca Greco
As someone who's dealt with multiple UCC filing corrections over the years, I can confirm that secured party creditor name discrepancies like yours are definitely fixable but need immediate attention. The comma difference between "Midwest Capital Solutions LLC" and "Midwest Capital Solutions, LLC" is exactly the type of variation that can cause perfection issues during UCC searches. I'd recommend filing your UCC-3 amendment today if possible - most states process these within 24-48 hours, and the correction will relate back to your original filing date. Also consider running a test UCC search under both name variations to see how your state's system handles the discrepancy. This will give you concrete evidence of whether the current filing would be discoverable by potential creditors doing their due diligence.
0 coins