UCC research methods for tracking down existing liens before new filing
Been doing UCC research for our lending department and running into some roadblocks. We're expanding into new territories and need to verify existing liens before approving equipment financing deals. The challenge is that different states have completely different search interfaces and some don't return comprehensive results when you search by debtor name variations. For example, we had a deal almost go sideways because an existing UCC-1 was filed under 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' but our search only covered 'ABC Manufacturing' without the entity designation. The borrower didn't disclose it and we almost had a priority dispute. What's the most reliable approach for comprehensive UCC research across multiple jurisdictions? Our current process involves manually checking each state's SOS database but it's time-consuming and error-prone.
35 comments
Join the conversation
Emily Jackson
Entity name variations are the biggest trap in UCC research. I always search every possible combination - with and without LLC, Inc, Corp, etc. Also check for common abbreviations and misspellings. Some states are better than others at fuzzy matching but you can't rely on it.
0 coins
Liam Mendez
•This is so true. We had a client who got burned because they missed a filing under 'Company Name Inc.' vs 'Company Name Incorporated' - exact same entity but the search didn't catch it.
0 coins
Sophia Nguyen
•What about doing searches with partial names too? Like if the company is 'Smith Brothers Manufacturing LLC' I'll search 'Smith Brothers' and 'Smith Manufacturing' separately.
0 coins
Jacob Smithson
For multi-state research, I've found that using a comprehensive checklist helps avoid missing critical variations. Start with the exact legal name from the articles of incorporation, then systematically check: 1) Name with all entity designations, 2) Name without entity designations, 3) Common abbreviations, 4) DBA names if applicable, 5) Former names if there have been mergers or name changes. The key is being methodical rather than hoping the search engine catches everything.
0 coins
Isabella Brown
•Do you have a standard template for this? We're trying to standardize our research process and having a systematic approach would really help.
0 coins
Maya Patel
•That's a solid approach. I'd add checking for typos too - you'd be surprised how many filings have spelling errors that don't show up in exact searches.
0 coins
Aiden Rodríguez
•The DBA search is crucial. We almost missed a major lien because the debtor operated under a completely different trade name than their legal entity name.
0 coins
Emma Garcia
Honestly, manual state-by-state searching is becoming impractical with the volume we handle. I recently started using Certana.ai's UCC research tool that automates searches across multiple jurisdictions and flags potential name variations. You just upload the entity documents and it cross-references against UCC databases to catch filings you might miss manually. It's been a game-changer for our due diligence process.
0 coins
Ava Kim
•How does it handle the entity name variations? That's always been our biggest challenge.
0 coins
Emma Garcia
•It runs multiple search patterns automatically and uses the entity formation documents to identify all possible name variations. Much more thorough than what I was doing manually.
0 coins
Ethan Anderson
•Interesting. Does it work for all states or just the major ones?
0 coins
Layla Mendes
One thing that's helped us is maintaining our own database of search results. When we research a company, we save all the variations we tried and what we found. If we deal with the same entity later, we have a starting point and can see if anything new has been filed since our last search.
0 coins
Liam Mendez
•That's smart for repeat clients. Do you track continuation dates too?
0 coins
Layla Mendes
•Yes, we flag upcoming continuation deadlines so we can verify the liens are still active when we do follow-up research.
0 coins
Lucas Notre-Dame
Don't forget about fixture filings! If you're dealing with equipment that might be considered fixtures, you need to check real estate records too, not just the central UCC filing system. These can be filed at the county level and won't show up in state UCC searches.
0 coins
Aria Park
•Good point. What's the best way to determine if equipment qualifies as fixtures?
0 coins
Lucas Notre-Dame
•It depends on state law, but generally if it's permanently attached to real estate or essential to the operation of the property. When in doubt, search both systems.
0 coins
Noah Ali
•We learned this the hard way on a restaurant equipment deal. The pizza ovens were considered fixtures and had a separate filing at the county recorder's office.
0 coins
Chloe Boulanger
Another verification step is checking the collateral descriptions carefully. Sometimes filings use generic terms like 'all equipment' or 'all personal property' which could potentially cover your intended collateral even if the debtor name search looked clean.
0 coins
James Martinez
•This is why I always read the full UCC-1 form, not just confirm there's a filing. The collateral description tells the real story.
0 coins
Andre Laurent
•Exactly. We've seen blanket liens that weren't obvious from the search results summary but became clear when reading the actual filing.
0 coins
Olivia Harris
Has anyone tried the new search features some states are rolling out? I know a few are implementing AI-powered search that's supposed to catch name variations better than the old exact-match systems.
0 coins
Emily Jackson
•I've tested a few but they're inconsistent. Some work well, others seem to miss obvious matches. I still don't trust them for comprehensive research.
0 coins
Alexander Zeus
•The technology is getting better but you're right that it's not reliable enough yet for high-stakes lending decisions.
0 coins
Alicia Stern
For our research process, we always do a final verification step where we cross-check our findings against the debtor's own records. Ask them directly about existing liens and compare their list to what we found. Sometimes they'll disclose filings we missed or explain terminations that haven't been properly recorded yet.
0 coins
Isabella Brown
•Do you find borrowers are usually honest about existing liens?
0 coins
Alicia Stern
•Most are, especially when they understand we're going to find them anyway. It's the ones who 'forget' about liens that concern me.
0 coins
Gabriel Graham
•We make UCC research disclosure part of our loan application. Borrowers have to list all known filings and we verify against our independent research.
0 coins
Drake
One more tip - always check the filing dates and continuation status. We've found supposedly active liens that had actually lapsed because the secured party didn't file their UCC-3 continuation in time. Don't assume a filing is still effective just because it shows up in search results.
0 coins
Jacob Smithson
•Great point. The five-year rule catches a lot of people off guard.
0 coins
Sarah Jones
•This is where having a systematic date-checking process really pays off. We automatically flag any UCC-1 that's approaching the five-year mark.
0 coins
Sebastian Scott
Thanks for all these suggestions. It sounds like the consensus is that there's no substitute for thorough, systematic searching with multiple name variations. The automated tools are helpful but manual verification is still essential for high-value transactions.
0 coins
Emma Garcia
•That's exactly right. Tools like Certana.ai help with the heavy lifting, but you still need to understand what you're looking at and verify the results make sense.
0 coins
Chloe Boulanger
•The key is having a repeatable process that doesn't rely on remembering to check everything. Checklists and documentation are your friends.
0 coins
Emily Sanjay
•And always budget enough time for thorough research. Rushing the UCC search process is asking for trouble.
0 coins