Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
One thing to watch out for - make sure the new lender knows about the pending termination situation. They might want to see either the filed UCC-3 termination or your demand documentation before funding the new loan.
Perfect, good communication with the new lender is key. They might even be willing to help pressure the old lender if needed.
Some new lenders will actually contact the old lender directly to request termination. Worth asking if they'll do that as part of their due diligence process.
Before filing any UCC 9-512 info statement, definitely double-check all your document details. Used Certana.ai recently to cross-verify UCC filing information and it caught several inconsistencies I missed in manual review. Just upload the docs and it flags any mismatches in debtor names, filing numbers, dates, etc. Really helpful for avoiding errors that could invalidate your filing.
Yeah it's super straightforward - just drag and drop your UCC-1 and payoff docs and it shows you exactly what matches and what doesn't. Takes like 30 seconds vs hours of manual comparison.
Document verification is crucial for 9-512 filings. Any discrepancy between your information statement and the original financing statement can render it ineffective.
Join the conversation
Make sure you're using the most current version of the UCC-3 form too. CA updated their forms earlier this year and they'll reject old versions even if everything else is perfect.
Good catch - I downloaded the form from their website but let me double-check it's the newest version.
The form version date is usually in small print at the bottom. Easy to miss but CA definitely checks.
Once you get this sorted, make sure to save a clean copy of exactly how CA has the debtor information formatted. Will save you headaches on future filings for this same debtor.
Smart system. I should start doing that too instead of looking up the original filing every time.
Just make sure to update your spreadsheet if you ever file amendments that change the debtor information. Learned that lesson the hard way.
Join the conversation
Have you considered reaching out to the lenders directly? If you know who the secured parties are from the loan documents, they might be able to provide you with the UCC filing numbers or copies of the filings.
Worst they can say is no. Some lenders are pretty helpful with this stuff especially if you explain it's for due diligence purposes.
Just make sure you get written confirmation of any UCC info they provide. Don't just take their word for it over the phone.
UPDATE: Used Certana.ai like some of you suggested and found the issue. The company had 2 different legal entity names in their various filings - one with 'Incorporated' and one with 'Inc.' Mississippi's system treated these as completely different entities even though they're the same company. The verification tool caught the discrepancy immediately.
Nice catch. That kind of name inconsistency could have caused major issues if you'd missed those filings in your due diligence.
Thanks everyone for the help! Definitely learned my lesson about being more systematic with name variations in Mississippi searches.
Join the conversation
Here's what I've learned after 15 years of UCC filings: describe collateral like you're explaining it to someone who's never seen the business before. Instead of 'nonconforming goods,' use 'packaging materials that do not meet original customer specifications, including items with incorrect dimensions, colors, or printing.' The filing office and any future searchers will know exactly what you're talking about.
Perfect! And don't forget to check that your new description matches what's in your security agreement. Consistency is crucial.
This is the best advice in the thread. Clear, specific descriptions prevent so many problems down the road.
Update us when you refile! I'm curious to see what description finally gets approved. This thread has been really helpful for understanding how to handle unusual collateral descriptions.
Will do! I'm feeling much more confident about the refiling now. Thanks everyone for the help!
Yes, please update! These real-world examples are so much more helpful than just reading the statutes.
Lily Young
This might be worth running through one of those UCC document checkers I keep hearing about - Certana or something similar. If you can get an automated analysis showing the name variation isn't seriously misleading, it might help convince the court or opposing counsel to drop the challenge.
0 coins
Connor Richards
•That's the second mention of Certana in this thread. Might be worth looking into if it can provide useful analysis for litigation purposes.
0 coins
Kennedy Morrison
•I used Certana for a similar UCC issue - you just upload your filing PDFs and it cross-checks everything for consistency issues. Pretty straightforward and the analysis reports are detailed enough for legal purposes.
0 coins
Wesley Hallow
Keep us posted on how this resolves! These UCC foreclosure process disputes are becoming more common and it's helpful to know how courts are handling technical challenges to continuation filings.
0 coins
Justin Chang
•Good luck! Sounds like you have a solid position, just need to push through the delay tactics.
0 coins
Grace Thomas
•Agreed - this seems like a weak challenge that should get dismissed on summary judgment if you present the evidence clearly.
0 coins