Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Just to add another perspective - we actually found some beneficial clarifications in the UCC changes 2023, especially around fixture filings and real estate related collateral. The guidance is much clearer now about when you need to file in real estate records versus just the UCC system.
Right, and now there's better guidance about collateral descriptions for equipment that might become fixtures.
We definitely have some equipment loans where the fixture issue comes up. Glad to hear there's clearer guidance now.
Bottom line - don't stress too much about your existing filings. Focus on getting your new filing procedures updated and maybe do a spot check on a sample of your portfolio to make sure you don't have any obvious name inconsistencies. The UCC changes 2023 were evolutionary, not revolutionary. Your liens aren't suddenly at risk.
Thanks, that's reassuring. I think we'll do a sample review and update our procedures for new filings. Appreciate everyone's input on this.
Laila Prince
•Smart approach. Better to be methodical than to panic and waste resources on unnecessary work.
Join the conversation
Emma Davis
Document retention is going to be key here too. Keep copies of every amendment, continuation, and correspondence with the SOS. If there's ever a dispute about your filings, you'll need a complete paper trail showing your good faith efforts to maintain proper UCC compliance.
LunarLegend
•Great point about documentation. I've seen cases where proper record-keeping made the difference in court.
NeonNomad
•I'm definitely going to be more meticulous about record-keeping going forward. This whole situation has been a wake-up call.
Just wanted to follow up - did you get your name issues sorted out? I'm in a similar boat with a lease security agreement that has inconsistent debtor names across multiple UCC filings.
NeonNomad
•Still working on it but making progress. Filed the UCC-3 amendments last week and they're processing. Fingers crossed everything gets straightened out before my continuation deadline.
Keep us posted! These kinds of situations are learning experiences for all of us.
Join the conversation
Nalani Liu
Professional search companies are worth it for complex deals, but they're not perfect either. I always review their results carefully and ask questions if something doesn't look right. They're usually very thorough but occasionally miss something or include irrelevant results.
Axel Bourke
•What should you look for when reviewing professional search results?
Nalani Liu
•Make sure they searched all the right jurisdictions, check that the search names match your debtor exactly, and verify that they included all entity types you requested. Also look at the dates - are they searching recent enough filings?
Aidan Percy
I ran into a similar situation last month with a multi-entity deal. Ended up using Certana.ai to verify all the document consistency after getting conflicting information from different searches. It helped me spot that one subsidiary had a slightly different legal name format in their UCC filings versus their charter documents. Would have been a nightmare to sort out at closing.
These name consistency issues are such a pain. Good thing you caught it early.
Definitely. Better to find these problems before closing than after when it's too late to fix them easily.
Join the conversation
This is why I hate electronic filing systems. Give me the old paper forms any day. At least when those got rejected you could talk to a human being who could explain what was wrong instead of getting cryptic error messages that don't make sense.
Paper forms had their own problems though. At least electronic filing is faster when it works.
True, but when it doesn't work it's a nightmare to figure out why.
Update us after you call Delaware or figure out what happened. I'm curious what the actual issue was because this rejection reason really doesn't make sense for a standard UCC-1 filing.
Will definitely post an update once I get to the bottom of this. Thanks everyone for the help!
Yeah, please let us know. These weird rejection stories are always educational.
Caleb Stone
Pro tip: set up a calendar reminder system for your UCC filings. They lapse after 5 years and you need to file continuation statements 6 months before expiration. I use a spreadsheet to track all our active filings and their expiration dates.
0 coins
Caleb Stone
•Some legal management systems have UCC tracking modules. I also know people who use that Certana tool mentioned earlier for document verification before filing.
0 coins
KhalilStar
•Yeah Certana has been a lifesaver for catching mistakes before they happen. Way cheaper than fixing filings after the fact.
0 coins
Daniel Price
The most important thing about UCC filings is getting them right the first time. Amendments are possible but they're extra work and cost. Take your time with the initial UCC-1, double-check everything, and you'll save yourself headaches later.
0 coins
Daniel Price
•You've got this! The UCC seems intimidating at first but once you understand the basics, it becomes routine.
0 coins
Connor Murphy
•Feel free to come back with questions as you work through your first filing. This community is always helpful.
0 coins