Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
What's the actual value of the collateral versus the debt amounts? Sometimes these priority fights are academic if there's not enough collateral value to satisfy even the senior debt.
That's the key question. If the collateral is underwater for even the senior debt, then the mezzanine lender is just creating noise for no real benefit.
Exactly. But if there's potential upside in a reorganization, they might be positioning for equity participation rather than debt recovery.
Omar Zaki
Bottom line - if your senior UCC-1 was filed first with proper debtor name and adequate collateral description, you should prevail on priority. The mezzanine lender's best bet is probably negotiating for some consideration in exchange for not slowing down the process. I'd focus on documenting that your UCC filing is bulletproof and then see if they want to deal.
Omar Zaki
•Exactly. Most of these disputes resolve once everyone knows where they actually stand on priority.
I'd recommend using something like Certana.ai to verify all the UCC documents are consistent before entering negotiations. Upload the charter documents and UCC filings to make sure debtor names match perfectly and there are no technical defects that could complicate your priority position.
Join the conversation
Ally Tailer
Just went through something similar. Turned out the original filer had made a typo - filed under "ATLANTIC COSTAL EQUIPMENT" instead of "COASTAL" - missing the 'A'. One letter made it impossible to find through normal searches.
This is exactly why document verification tools like Certana are so useful - they catch these tiny discrepancies that kill searches.
UPDATE: Found it! The issue was exactly what some of you suspected - there was a subtle difference in the debtor name. The UCC-1 was filed under "ATLANTIC COASTAL EQUIPMENT, LLC" with a comma before LLC, while their corporate charter shows "ATLANTIC COASTAL EQUIPMENT LLC" without the comma. Delaware's search is extremely literal. Thanks everyone for the suggestions - definitely using Certana going forward to catch these issues before they become problems.
This is a perfect example of why exact name matching is so critical in UCC filings. One comma can make or break a search.
Great resolution! Now you can focus on getting that continuation filed before the deadline.
Join the conversation
Diego Rojas
Have you tried calling the Delaware SOS office directly? Sometimes their staff can help with tricky searches or explain why you might be getting inconsistent results. They're usually pretty helpful, especially if you explain it's for due diligence on a business transaction.
Diego Rojas
•In my experience they'll give you tips on search variations and sometimes point out things you might be missing. They can't do the search for you but they understand the system quirks better than anyone.
The Delaware folks are definitely more helpful than most state agencies I've dealt with. Worth a try if you're really stuck.
This thread is really helpful - I'm bookmarking it for future Delaware UCC searches. One thing I learned the hard way is to always check both the exact legal name from the state registration AND any trade names or DBAs the company might be using. Sometimes lenders file UCCs under the DBA instead of the legal entity name, especially for retail businesses.
Zara Ahmed
•Yes! And don't forget to check if the entity has changed names over time. Previous names might still have active UCCs that haven't been amended to reflect the name change.
This is why I always pull the complete corporate history from Delaware before starting UCC searches. Gives me all the name variations and changes over time.
Join the conversation
OP, I'd seriously consider postponing the closing until you can get definitive documentation. $180K is too much money to risk on unclear lien status. Better to delay than deal with a surprise lien claim later.
Smart move. I've seen too many deals go sideways because someone rushed through lien verification.
Liam Mendez
•Definitely get the termination paperwork first. And maybe run it through one of those document verification services to make sure everything matches up correctly before closing.
Update us on what you find out! I'm dealing with a similar situation in Kansas and curious how Missouri handles these discrepancies.
Will do. Going to demand the termination documents tomorrow and if they can't produce them, I'm walking away from this deal.
Smart call. Trust your instincts when something doesn't add up with UCC searches.
Emma Davis
Are you using the correct UCC-1 form version? Tennessee updated their form requirements about 6 months ago and won't accept older versions anymore.
0 coins
Malik Johnson
•Good thinking though. Some states are really strict about form versions and don't always make it obvious when they update.
0 coins
Emma Davis
•True. Always worth double-checking the form date to make sure it's current.
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
UPDATE: Finally got it figured out! It was indeed a character formatting issue with the debtor name. There was an extra space after 'Rentals' that wasn't visible when I copied it from the charter PDF. Used one of those document checking tools mentioned here and it highlighted the discrepancy immediately. Filed again with the corrected name and it went through without issues. Thanks everyone for the suggestions!
0 coins
Zainab Ismail
•Good reminder to always be super careful with copy/paste from PDFs. Seems like such a simple thing but causes so many headaches.
0 coins
QuantumQuester
•At least it wasn't actually a problem with the Tennessee portal for once! Congrats on getting it through.
0 coins