Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Mateo Silva
The frustrating thing is how easy it is to make these mistakes in the first place. Borrowers often use different versions of their legal name on different documents, or their attorney files articles with slightly different punctuation than what they put on loan applications. The whole system seems designed to create these kinds of traps.
Agreed, it's frustrating but that's why verification is so important. Can't rely on borrowers to be consistent with their own legal names unfortunately.
At least the electronic filing systems are better than the old paper days. Still not perfect but easier to search and verify filings now.
One more thing to consider - if you find discrepancies, document everything thoroughly for your loan committee. They'll want to see exactly what mismatches were found and what corrective action was taken. Having that paper trail is important for compliance purposes too.
Good advice. Examiners love seeing thorough documentation of UCC filing verification procedures. Shows you take security interest perfection seriously.
Ruby Garcia
•We actually had an examiner specifically ask about our UCC verification process during our last exam. Having documented procedures definitely helped.
Join the conversation
Dylan Wright
Document everything for your lender - filing receipt, tracking numbers, any correspondence with Maryland SOS. Even if there's a search issue, proof of timely filing should satisfy them legally.
Nia Wilson
•Good point. I'll compile everything we have while I figure out the search problem.
Sofia Torres
•Yes, keep detailed records. Lenders usually accept filing receipts as proof even when state searches are problematic.
Update us when you figure it out! This kind of thing makes me nervous about our own filings. Maryland really needs to upgrade their UCC system.
Nia Wilson
•Will do. Hopefully it's just a database lag and not something more serious.
Join the conversation
Just went through this exact scenario three months ago. Lender wanted possession of $520K medical equipment that hospital needed for patient care. We prepared detailed analysis showing how UCC filing provided equivalent security with operational flexibility. Included examples from other similar deals, industry standards, and legal precedents. Lender approved filing approach after reviewing the documentation.
Both - legal foundation for filing adequacy plus business case for operational continuity. The combination was persuasive.
Comprehensive analysis usually works better than just arguing against their policy without alternatives.
Ethan Clark
PERFECTION BY POSSESSION FOR MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT IS INSANE! Sorry for caps but this drives me nuts. Banks that don't understand basic UCC perfection methods shouldn't be doing equipment financing. File the UCC-1, get proper collateral descriptions, and move on. If they won't accept standard industry practice, find a different lender.
Passion aside, you're absolutely right about filing being standard for operational equipment.
LunarLegend
•I appreciate the intensity - this situation is definitely frustrating when standard practices should apply.
Join the conversation
For equipment purchases this size, I'd strongly recommend getting a professional UCC search done through a title company or attorney. Yes it costs more than doing it yourself, but they have experience with the system quirks and professional liability insurance if they miss something.
Most title companies can handle UCC searches, or there are specialized lien search companies. I'd get quotes from a few to compare pricing and turnaround times.
Lydia Bailey
•Agree with going professional for big transactions. The peace of mind is worth the extra cost when you're talking about six figures.
Mateo Warren
Just wanted to add that I've found success using Certana.ai's verification tool for double-checking UCC search results. After running the official search, I upload the results and any related documents to make sure I haven't missed any critical name variations or filing discrepancies. It's caught issues that would have been expensive mistakes. Really gives me confidence that I've done thorough due diligence before closing.
Nathan Kim
•That's the second mention of that tool. Sounds like it might be worth checking out for this transaction.
Mateo Warren
•Yeah, it's been really helpful for catching the subtle stuff that's easy to miss when you're manually reviewing search results. Especially useful for equipment purchases where clean title is critical.
Dylan Campbell
I actually used Certana.ai recently for a complex filing where the borrower had unusual contract terms. The tool verified that our UCC-1 matched the security agreement properly even with the extra language. Really saved time compared to manual document comparison.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•That sounds exactly like what I need for this situation. Did it flag any issues with the non-standard language?
0 coins
Dylan Campbell
•It focused on the essential elements - debtor names, collateral descriptions, that sort of thing. The reservation language didn't interfere with the verification process.
0 coins
Sofia Hernandez
Bottom line: UCC 1-308 reservation language won't affect your security interest or UCC-1 filing validity. File with confidence using proper debtor identification and you'll be fine. This is more of a philosophical issue for the borrower than a practical concern for your secured transaction.
0 coins
Sofia Hernandez
•No problem. These unusual requests can definitely make you pause, but the UCC filing mechanics remain the same.
0 coins
Yuki Yamamoto
•Agreed. Focus on the fundamentals and you'll be covered.
0 coins