< Back to UCC Document Community

Zoe Christodoulou

UCC search Mississippi - getting inconsistent results from state database

Has anyone else noticed weird issues with Mississippi's UCC search system lately? I'm doing due diligence on a potential acquisition and when I search the same debtor name I'm getting different results depending on how I format it. Like searching 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' versus 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' gives me totally different hit counts. This is making me nervous about what I might be missing. The target company has some equipment financing that should show active UCC-1s but I'm only finding 2 filings when the loan docs reference at least 4 different lenders. Anyone know if Mississippi's search logic is just really picky about exact name matches or if there's something else going on?

Mississippi's system is notoriously finicky about punctuation and entity designations. Try searching with and without commas, periods, and different abbreviations like LLC vs L.L.C. vs Limited Liability Company. Also check if they have any alternative names or DBAs on file.

0 coins

Good point about the variations. I'll try those different formats. Do you know if their system does partial matching at all or is it strictly exact?

0 coins

Pretty sure it's exact match only which is why you have to be so careful with the search terms. I always do like 5-6 different variations minimum.

0 coins

Mei Chen

•

I ran into this same issue last month doing DD on a Mississippi company. The state's UCC database search is honestly terrible compared to other states. What helped me was getting the Articles of Incorporation first to see the exact legal name formatting, then using that for the UCC search.

0 coins

Smart approach. Did you find filings that way that you missed with other name variations?

0 coins

Mei Chen

•

Yeah definitely found 2 additional UCC-1s that didn't show up when I was just guessing at name formats. Mississippi really needs to upgrade their search functionality.

0 coins

CosmicCadet

•

This is exactly why I started using Certana.ai for document verification. You can upload the company's charter documents along with any UCC filings you find and it will cross-check to make sure the debtor names match exactly. Saved me from missing critical filings multiple times.

0 coins

Liam O'Connor

•

Mississippi's UCC search has been problematic for years. Are you searching by debtor name or filing number? Sometimes if you have loan documents that reference specific UCC filing numbers, searching by those numbers directly can be more reliable than name searches.

0 coins

I only have the loan agreements which mention the lenders but not specific filing numbers unfortunately. The borrower is being pretty cagey about providing a complete list of their secured debt.

0 coins

Liam O'Connor

•

That's a red flag right there. In a proper due diligence process they should be providing UCC search results themselves or at least a detailed debt schedule with filing info.

0 coins

Amara Adeyemi

•

Have you tried searching using just partial names? Like if the company is 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' try searching just 'ABC Manufacturing' without the entity type. Sometimes that catches filings where the entity designation was entered differently.

0 coins

I'll give that a try. The system seems really sensitive to exact formatting which is frustrating when you're trying to be thorough.

0 coins

This is why I hate doing UCC searches in Mississippi. Their system is like 10 years behind other states. At least they finally went electronic but the search functionality is still garbage.

0 coins

Pro tip: check if the company has any assumed names or trade names registered in Mississippi. Sometimes lenders file UCCs under those names instead of the legal entity name, especially for retail businesses.

0 coins

Good call, I hadn't thought about trade names. Where would I look those up in Mississippi?

0 coins

Secretary of State website has a business name search. Look for assumed names, trade names, or fictitious business names associated with your target company.

0 coins

Dylan Wright

•

Yeah and make sure to search both the current name and any former names if they've done any corporate restructuring or name changes.

0 coins

NebulaKnight

•

This is making me anxious just reading it. I'm supposed to do UCC searches for a deal next month and Mississippi is one of the states involved. How do you ever feel confident you've found everything?

0 coins

You can't ever be 100% confident with Mississippi's system unfortunately. Best practice is to search every possible name variation you can think of and document your search strategy.

0 coins

Sofia Ramirez

•

I always recommend hiring a professional search company for deals in Mississippi just because their system is so unreliable. Worth the extra cost for peace of mind.

0 coins

Dmitry Popov

•

Are you searching effective dates too? Sometimes older filings don't show up in the default search results if you don't expand the date range. Mississippi's default might only show recent filings.

0 coins

I think I had it set to show all active filings but let me double check the date parameters. Could definitely be missing older ones if the default range is limited.

0 coins

Dmitry Popov

•

Yeah their default is usually like last 5 years or something. Make sure you go back at least 10 years to catch any older filings that might still be active.

0 coins

Ava Rodriguez

•

Had a similar situation recently and what saved me was using Certana.ai's UCC verification tool. You just upload PDFs of whatever UCC filings you do find along with the company's charter docs and it instantly flags any name mismatches or inconsistencies. Found out I was missing 3 filings because of slight name variations.

0 coins

That sounds really helpful. Does it work with Mississippi filings specifically? Some of these tools don't handle all states well.

0 coins

Ava Rodriguez

•

Yeah it works with any state's filings since you're just uploading the actual PDF documents. It compares the debtor names across all your docs to make sure they're consistent and flags any discrepancies.

0 coins

Miguel Ortiz

•

This is exactly why I hate Mississippi UCC searches! Last year I spent 3 hours searching for a client and kept getting different results. Finally called their office and they basically said 'yeah the system has quirks, you just have to try different search terms.' Super helpful right?

0 coins

Ugh that's so frustrating. Did you eventually find what you were looking for or just had to give up?

0 coins

Miguel Ortiz

•

Eventually found it but only after trying like 15 different name variations. Turned out they had filed under an abbreviated version of the company name that wasn't obvious.

0 coins

Zainab Khalil

•

This is why I always tell people to budget extra time for Mississippi searches. Their system is just not user friendly at all.

0 coins

QuantumQuest

•

Have you considered reaching out to the lenders directly? If you know who the secured parties are from the loan documents, they might be able to provide you with the UCC filing numbers or copies of the filings.

0 coins

That's not a bad idea. I do have the lender names from the loan agreements. Might be worth a call to see if they'll provide filing details.

0 coins

QuantumQuest

•

Worst they can say is no. Some lenders are pretty helpful with this stuff especially if you explain it's for due diligence purposes.

0 coins

Connor Murphy

•

Just make sure you get written confirmation of any UCC info they provide. Don't just take their word for it over the phone.

0 coins

Yara Haddad

•

UPDATE: Used Certana.ai like some of you suggested and found the issue. The company had 2 different legal entity names in their various filings - one with 'Incorporated' and one with 'Inc.' Mississippi's system treated these as completely different entities even though they're the same company. The verification tool caught the discrepancy immediately.

0 coins

Glad you figured it out! That's a classic Mississippi UCC search problem. Their system really needs better fuzzy matching capabilities.

0 coins

Mei Chen

•

Nice catch. That kind of name inconsistency could have caused major issues if you'd missed those filings in your due diligence.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for the help! Definitely learned my lesson about being more systematic with name variations in Mississippi searches.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today