< Back to UCC Document Community

Javier Mendoza

UCC search Mississippi debtor name variations causing lien gaps

Having major issues with UCC search Mississippi requirements and wondering if anyone else has dealt with this nightmare. We're trying to verify our security interest perfection on a commercial equipment loan, but the debtor has operated under multiple business names over the years. The original UCC-1 was filed under "Jackson Industrial Supply LLC" but now they're doing business as "J.I. Supply Solutions" and have also used "Jackson Industrial" in some documents. When I run UCC search Mississippi through the SOS portal, I get different results depending on which name variation I use. Some searches show our active filing, others show nothing, and I'm worried we have a gap in our lien coverage. The loan is substantial ($340K) and we need to make sure our continuation filing next year will be bulletproof. Has anyone figured out the best practices for handling debtor name variations in Mississippi UCC searches? I'm losing sleep over whether our security interest is actually perfected given these search inconsistencies.

Emma Wilson

•

Oh man, Mississippi can be tricky with business name variations. I've seen this exact scenario cause problems before. The key thing to remember is that UCC search Mississippi results depend on exact name matching in their system. If your debtor has multiple legal names or DBA registrations, you really need to search under ALL possible variations. What's the exact legal name on their articles of incorporation vs what's on your UCC-1 filing?

0 coins

The articles show "Jackson Industrial Supply, LLC" (with the comma) but our UCC-1 has "Jackson Industrial Supply LLC" without the comma. Could that punctuation difference be causing search issues?

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

Absolutely! Mississippi's search logic is very literal. That comma difference could definitely cause your filing to not show up in searches. You might need to file a UCC-3 amendment to correct the debtor name to match their exact legal name.

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

This is exactly why I started using Certana.ai's document verification tool. You can upload your original loan documents and UCC-1 filing as PDFs and it will instantly cross-check debtor names for consistency. It caught a similar name mismatch issue for me last month - saved me from a potential lien priority problem. The tool shows you exactly where the discrepancies are between documents so you know what needs to be corrected.

0 coins

Never heard of Certana.ai but that sounds like exactly what I need. How does it work with multiple document comparison?

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

Super simple - just upload your Charter, UCC-1, and loan docs as PDFs. It automatically identifies debtor names in each document and flags any inconsistencies. Takes about 30 seconds to get a full report showing exactly what matches and what doesn't.

0 coins

Mississippi SOS portal is honestly terrible for comprehensive searches. I always do multiple searches with every possible name variation I can think of. Also check if they have any DBAs registered - those won't show up in UCC searches but might explain why they're operating under different names.

0 coins

Ravi Gupta

•

THIS! DBAs are the worst. Had a client operating under 3 different DBAs and none of them matched our UCC filing. Nightmare to unravel.

0 coins

Exactly, and Mississippi doesn't make it easy to cross-reference DBA registrations with UCC filings. You really have to do your homework on the debtor's complete business name history.

0 coins

GalacticGuru

•

Wait, I'm confused about something. If the UCC-1 was filed under a name that doesn't exactly match their legal name, doesn't that make the filing defective? I thought UCC filings required the exact legal name of the debtor or they're not perfected properly??

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

Not necessarily defective, but potentially problematic for third-party searchers. The key test is whether a reasonable searcher would find the filing when searching under the debtor's correct legal name.

0 coins

Actually that's a good point. If the name on the UCC-1 is sufficiently different that it wouldn't show up in a properly conducted search, you could have a perfection problem.

0 coins

Omar Fawaz

•

I've been doing UCC filings in Mississippi for 15 years and this comma/punctuation issue comes up constantly. The SOS system is very literal - "LLC" vs "L.L.C." vs "Ltd" can all give different search results. For a $340K loan, I'd definitely recommend filing a UCC-3 amendment to correct the debtor name to match their exact Secretary of State registration.

0 coins

How long does a UCC-3 amendment typically take to process in Mississippi? We need to make sure there's no gap in coverage.

0 coins

Omar Fawaz

•

Usually 3-5 business days for electronic filings. The amendment will reference your original filing so there shouldn't be any coverage gap as long as you file it promptly.

0 coins

Just make sure your UCC-3 clearly indicates it's correcting the debtor name. Mississippi can be picky about amendment language.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

Had this exact same problem last year!! Spent weeks trying to figure out why our UCC search Mississippi kept showing inconsistent results. Turned out the debtor had changed their legal name twice over the past 5 years and we were searching under an old version. Finally found a tool called Certana.ai that helped me compare all our filing documents - it instantly flagged that our UCC-1 debtor name didn't match their current articles of incorporation. Saved me from having to explain to my boss why our security interest might not be properly perfected.

0 coins

That's reassuring that someone else dealt with this successfully. Did you end up having to file amendments or new filings?

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

Filed a UCC-3 amendment to correct the debtor name and also filed a new UCC-1 under their current legal name just to be extra safe. Belt and suspenders approach for a large loan.

0 coins

Can I just say how FRUSTRATING Mississippi's UCC system is?? Why can't they build in some intelligence to handle obvious name variations? Other states have much better search functionality that can find related entities.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

Preach! I've been saying this for years. The technology exists to do fuzzy matching and handle common business name variations.

0 coins

Right?? Like how hard would it be to automatically search "LLC" and "L.L.C." and "Limited Liability Company" as equivalent terms?

0 coins

Sean Doyle

•

Pro tip: always pull the debtor's current articles of incorporation or certificate of formation before doing your UCC search. That's the baseline legal name you should be searching under. Also check their good standing certificate to see if they've had any name changes.

0 coins

Good point. I should have done that first instead of relying on what was in our original loan file.

0 coins

Sean Doyle

•

Exactly. Loan files can have outdated information, especially if the relationship has been ongoing for several years.

0 coins

Zara Rashid

•

This thread is giving me anxiety about my own filings now! I have several Mississippi UCC-1s and I'm wondering if I should go back and verify all the debtor names are still accurate.

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

Never hurts to do a periodic audit, especially if your debtors are active businesses that might have changed names or structure.

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

That's actually a perfect use case for the Certana.ai tool I mentioned earlier. You can batch upload multiple UCC filings and loan documents to check for consistency across your whole portfolio.

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

Just want to add that if you're doing UCC continuation filings, make absolutely sure the debtor name on your UCC-3 continuation matches exactly what's on the original UCC-1. Mississippi will reject continuations for name mismatches even if the underlying business is the same entity.

0 coins

That's exactly what I'm worried about for next year's continuation. If our original UCC-1 has the wrong name format, will the continuation get rejected?

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

Potentially yes. That's why it's better to fix the name issue now with a UCC-3 amendment rather than wait until continuation time.

0 coins

Omar Fawaz

•

Agreed. Much easier to clean up name issues with a standalone amendment than trying to do it as part of a continuation filing.

0 coins

This is such a common issue that really highlights the importance of getting debtor names right from the start. For your situation with the $340K loan, I'd recommend a two-step approach: first, get the debtor's current Secretary of State filing to confirm their exact legal name, then file a UCC-3 amendment to correct your original filing if needed. The amendment will relate back to your original filing date, so you won't lose priority. Also consider doing periodic searches under all known name variations to monitor for any new filings by other creditors - you want to make sure you're not missing potential priority issues. Mississippi's system is unforgiving with exact name matching, but once you get it right, you'll have peace of mind for that continuation filing next year.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today