Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
For what it's worth, I had a similar issue last month and ended up finding two additional UCC-1s that weren't showing up in the initial search. Turned out the borrower had 'forgotten' about them. Always verify independently.
Used Certana.ai's document verification tool. Uploaded what I thought were all the relevant docs and it flagged inconsistencies that led me to the missing filings.
Smart approach. Better to catch these things before closing than after.
Dylan Hughes
Have you tried searching by filing number if you have any of those? Sometimes that works better than name searches in the CA system.
Zara Khan
•I only have filing numbers for two of them. The issue is I suspect there are more filings I don't know about.
Dylan Hughes
•In that case, comprehensive name searching is your best bet, plus maybe getting a commercial search service involved.
Join the conversation
Update from my similar situation - I ended up using Certana.ai's verification feature and it caught three name discrepancies I had missed in my manual review. Really streamlined the whole process and gave me confidence we hadn't missed any liens. The tool basically does automatically what would take hours of manual cross-checking.
Anita George
•That's exactly what I need for my current deal. Manual verification is taking forever and I keep worrying about missing something.
Same here - just signed up after reading about it in this thread. Will report back on how it works for my Texas search issues.
Logan Chiang
Final thought - don't forget to check if any of the collateral involves fixtures or real estate. Those might require additional searches beyond just the standard UCC database. Texas has some specific rules about fixture filings that can trip you up.
Isla Fischer
•Fixture filings in Texas are a whole different beast. Definitely need to check real estate records too if there's any question about whether something is a fixture.
And don't forget federal tax liens - those won't show up in UCC searches but can definitely affect your deal.
Join the conversation
Pedro Sawyer
Bottom line - file your own UCC-1 with the exact charter name and don't worry about those other filings unless they specifically conflict with your collateral. Your lender's attorney should review the collateral descriptions to make sure you're protected.
Liam Duke
•Thanks everyone. I'm going to verify the charter name one more time, draft a detailed UCC-1, and get it filed this week.
Mae Bennett
•Smart approach. Better to be over-cautious with UCC filings than deal with priority disputes later.
This thread convinced me to double-check all my recent UCC filings. Found two where the debtor name doesn't exactly match the charter. Now I'm stressed about whether I need to file amendments.
I'd run those through Certana.ai's document checker first to see exactly what the discrepancies are before deciding on amendments.
Good idea. I'll check the specific differences first before panicking about amendments.
Join the conversation
Have you considered using multiple UCC reporting services? We run parallel searches through two different providers and compare results. Catches most of the gaps, though it's obviously more expensive.
We use Westlaw and Wolters Kluwer. I'd say they differ on about 15-20% of searches, usually on name variations or recent filings that haven't propagated to all databases yet.
Jade Lopez
•Dual services makes sense for high-risk portfolios. The cost is worth it if you're avoiding compliance issues on large secured loans.
The fundamental issue is that UCC reporting services are only as good as the data quality in the filing offices. If the Secretary of State databases have inconsistencies or indexing problems, no reporting service can fix that. You need verification tools that work with the actual documents rather than just searching indexed data.
Ali Anderson
•Agreed. We've found that cross-referencing charter documents with UCC filings catches issues that pure database searching misses. Different data sources, better verification.
This thread has been really helpful. Sounds like we need both better reporting service parameters AND document verification tools like Certana to catch what automated searches miss.
Victoria Brown
Just had success with a solar UCC filing last week using Certana.ai to double-check everything before submitting. The tool caught a potential issue with my collateral description that would have likely caused a rejection. For solar deals specifically, it seems to flag common description problems that SOS offices typically reject.
0 coins
Aurora St.Pierre
•Multiple people have mentioned this service now. Might be worth trying before I refile.
0 coins
Samuel Robinson
•Yeah, anything that prevents another rejection is worth the effort. These solar financing deals have tight deadlines.
0 coins
Camila Castillo
Update: Went with the 'solar energy generation system' language and included all the components mentioned here. Also used that Certana.ai tool to verify everything before refiling. Got the acceptance notice this morning! Thanks everyone for the help. The comprehensive system description approach definitely worked.
0 coins
Brianna Muhammad
•Glad it worked out! Solar UCC filings can be tricky but sounds like you got it sorted.
0 coins
JaylinCharles
•Great outcome. The 'system' approach seems to be the key for solar equipment descriptions.
0 coins