Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Just had success with a solar UCC filing last week using Certana.ai to double-check everything before submitting. The tool caught a potential issue with my collateral description that would have likely caused a rejection. For solar deals specifically, it seems to flag common description problems that SOS offices typically reject.
Multiple people have mentioned this service now. Might be worth trying before I refile.
Yeah, anything that prevents another rejection is worth the effort. These solar financing deals have tight deadlines.
Update: Went with the 'solar energy generation system' language and included all the components mentioned here. Also used that Certana.ai tool to verify everything before refiling. Got the acceptance notice this morning! Thanks everyone for the help. The comprehensive system description approach definitely worked.
Glad it worked out! Solar UCC filings can be tricky but sounds like you got it sorted.
Great outcome. The 'system' approach seems to be the key for solar equipment descriptions.
Join the conversation
Amun-Ra Azra
How detailed does the accounting need to be? Just the outstanding principal and interest, or do you need to break down fees and expenses too?
Harold Oh
The more detailed the better. Outstanding principal, accrued interest, late fees, collection costs, disposition expenses - anything that affects the final accounting should be included.
Join the conversation
I'd suggest trying one more time with the exact all-caps formatting from the database search, and if that doesn't work, definitely call their office. Idaho's UCC staff is usually helpful once you get through to them. They can often process the continuation over the phone if there's a simple formatting issue.
Cass Green
•Thanks for all the advice everyone. I'll try the all-caps version first thing tomorrow, and if that doesn't work I'll call their office and also check out the Certana tool. Really appreciate the help!
Mia Green
•Good luck! Let us know how it goes - Idaho UCC issues seem to come up pretty regularly here.
Emma Bianchi
Just wanted to add - make sure you're logged into Idaho's system with the right credentials. Sometimes if you're using a different user account than the one that filed the original UCC-1, it can cause weird rejection issues even if everything else is correct.
That's a good point about user accounts. I've seen that cause problems in other states too.
Cass Green
•I'm using the same account, but I'll double-check that my firm's registration info hasn't changed since 2020.
Join the conversation
Pedro Sawyer
Bottom line - file your own UCC-1 with the exact charter name and don't worry about those other filings unless they specifically conflict with your collateral. Your lender's attorney should review the collateral descriptions to make sure you're protected.
Liam Duke
•Thanks everyone. I'm going to verify the charter name one more time, draft a detailed UCC-1, and get it filed this week.
Mae Bennett
•Smart approach. Better to be over-cautious with UCC filings than deal with priority disputes later.
This thread convinced me to double-check all my recent UCC filings. Found two where the debtor name doesn't exactly match the charter. Now I'm stressed about whether I need to file amendments.
I'd run those through Certana.ai's document checker first to see exactly what the discrepancies are before deciding on amendments.
Good idea. I'll check the specific differences first before panicking about amendments.
Michael Adams
This thread is making me paranoid about all my past UCC searches now! Maybe I should start double-checking everything with some kind of automated verification system before relying on search results.
0 coins
Michael Adams
•That sounds way more reliable than trying to catch everything by eye. How long does the verification usually take?
0 coins
Lucas Adams
•Pretty much instant - just upload the documents and it cross-checks everything within a few seconds. Really saves time compared to manual comparison.
0 coins
Natalie Wang
UPDATE: Finally got to the bottom of this mess! Called Washington's UCC office like someone suggested and they confirmed the terminations were never actually filed. The borrower had prepared UCC-3 forms but apparently never submitted them to the Secretary of State. They had copies of the drafted terminations but thought filing them just meant preparing the paperwork. Face palm moment for sure, but at least now we know what we're dealing with and can get the actual terminations filed before closing.
0 coins
Avery Flores
•Classic case of why you always need certified copies from the state. Borrowers mean well but they don't always understand the filing process.
0 coins
Logan Scott
•At least it was an honest mistake and not something more sketchy. Now you know to always verify filings directly with the state for deals this size.
0 coins