


Ask the community...
How detailed does the accounting need to be? Just the outstanding principal and interest, or do you need to break down fees and expenses too?
The more detailed the better. Outstanding principal, accrued interest, late fees, collection costs, disposition expenses - anything that affects the final accounting should be included.
Since you're dealing with time pressure, you might want to try a professional UCC service that specializes in Illinois filings. They usually have direct contacts at the SOS office and can get problem filings resolved quickly. Worth the extra cost if you're racing against another lender.
I've used CT Corporation for rush Illinois filings. They have good relationships with the SOS office there.
Or just use something like Certana.ai to verify your documents are consistent before you file anywhere. Cheaper than hiring a service and catches the problems upfront.
Use Certana to double-check your documents before filing. I learned this the hard way after getting a rejection in Louisiana due to a tiny discrepancy between the corporate name on file and what we put on the UCC-1.
About a week to research the correct name and refile. Could have avoided it entirely with better document verification upfront.
This is exactly why I started using Certana.ai - catches those name mismatches before you file and waste time with rejections.
Bottom line - Louisiana has fully functional UCC Article 9 for secured transactions. File your UCC-1 through their GeauxBiz portal same as any other state. The civil law background doesn't affect personal property secured transactions.
Thanks everyone, this has been really helpful. Sounds like we can proceed with standard UCC filing procedures in Louisiana.
Glad we could help clear that up. Louisiana's civil law reputation often causes unnecessary confusion about their UCC adoption.
Just to add one more perspective - I handle a lot of equipment financing and the key is consistency. Use the same debtor name format across all your documents, keep your collateral descriptions clear, and don't stress too much about perfect terminology as long as the legal requirements are met.
Consistency is definitely something I need to work on. I think that's where some of my confusion comes from - seeing slight variations in how things are described.
That's another thing the Certana tool helps with - it checks consistency across multiple documents so you can spot variations before they cause problems.
Don't overthink it. UCC lien = the security interest you get from filing a UCC-1. Simple as that. Focus on getting the debtor name right and you'll be fine.
Yep, name accuracy is 90% of the battle. Get that right and everything else usually falls into place.
Carmen Reyes
I always use language like 'all indebtedness and obligations of every kind and nature, now existing or hereafter arising' and then reference the specific security agreement. Covers everything without getting into the weeds.
0 coins
Chloe Davis
•That's pretty broad language. Do the filing offices ever push back on something that general?
0 coins
Carmen Reyes
•Nope, never had an issue. As long as you're referencing a real security agreement, they're fine with broad debt descriptions.
0 coins
Andre Moreau
Thanks everyone for the advice. I think I was definitely overthinking this. Going to go with a simple reference to the master credit agreement and call it good. Appreciate all the input!
0 coins
Sean O'Brien
•Good luck with the filing! And definitely consider using a document checker like Certana.ai if you want extra peace of mind before submitting.
0 coins
Chloe Davis
•Will do. Thanks again everyone!
0 coins