< Back to UCC Document Community

The Boss

UCC lien search Idaho - debtor name variations causing missed results?

Running into issues with our UCC lien search Idaho process and wondering if others have dealt with this. We're doing due diligence on a potential acquisition and keep finding discrepancies when searching the same debtor under slightly different name formats. For example, searching 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' versus 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' (with the comma) returns different results in the Idaho SOS database. Same thing happens with 'John D Smith' versus 'John David Smith'. This is creating gaps in our lien searches that could be problematic for the transaction. Has anyone found a reliable method for ensuring comprehensive UCC lien search coverage when debtor names might be recorded with variations? We're particularly concerned about missing active liens that could affect the deal structure.

This is exactly why I always run multiple search variations. Idaho's system is pretty strict about exact matches. Try searching with and without commas, periods, abbreviations like 'Corp' vs 'Corporation', and middle initials vs full middle names. Also search using any DBA names or former business names if you have them.

0 coins

Good point about DBAs. We missed a lien once because the debtor was doing business under a completely different name that wasn't obvious from the corporate records.

0 coins

Jasmine Quinn

•

How do you handle searching for individuals though? The middle name issue is huge - sometimes they file with middle initial, sometimes full name, sometimes no middle name at all.

0 coins

Oscar Murphy

•

We had similar issues until we started using Certana.ai's document verification tool. You can upload the corporate documents and UCC filings to instantly cross-check debtor names and catch these variations. It flags inconsistencies between charter documents and UCC-1 filings that manual searches often miss. Really helps ensure you're not missing liens due to name formatting differences.

0 coins

Nora Bennett

•

Interesting - does it work with Idaho's specific database quirks? Their search function seems more finicky than other states.

0 coins

Oscar Murphy

•

Yeah it works well because it's checking document consistency rather than relying on the state database search alone. So if a lien was filed as 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' but your corporate docs show 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' it'll flag that discrepancy.

0 coins

Ryan Andre

•

Idaho Secretary of State office told me they don't do fuzzy matching like some other states. It's exact match only which is why you're seeing this issue. I always create a spreadsheet with every possible name variation before starting searches.

0 coins

Lauren Zeb

•

That's so frustrating! Other states at least give you suggestions when your search doesn't match exactly.

0 coins

What kind of variations do you typically include in your spreadsheet? I'm trying to build a more systematic approach.

0 coins

Ryan Andre

•

I include: entity type variations (LLC vs L.L.C.), punctuation differences, abbreviated vs spelled out words, and any historical names from the Articles of Amendment. For individuals I add with/without middle names and different suffix formats.

0 coins

This bit us hard on a deal last year. Found three liens under slight name variations AFTER closing that should have been discovered during due diligence. Now we pay for professional UCC search services on larger transactions rather than doing it ourselves.

0 coins

Anthony Young

•

Ouch! What was the financial impact? Were you able to recover from the other party?

0 coins

Let's just say it was significant enough that we changed our entire search protocol. The professional services aren't cheap but they're worth it for peace of mind.

0 coins

Have you tried searching using the entity ID number from the Articles of Incorporation? Sometimes that gives more reliable results than name searches, though not all filers include it on UCC-1 forms.

0 coins

Admin_Masters

•

That's a great tip! I didn't know you could search by entity ID in Idaho's system.

0 coins

Problem is most secured parties don't bother putting the entity ID on the UCC-1 filing so you still miss liens even with that approach.

0 coins

Ella Thompson

•

Another approach is searching by address if you have the debtor's registered office or principal place of business. Not foolproof but sometimes catches filings you'd miss with name searches alone.

0 coins

JacksonHarris

•

Smart thinking. Address searches can reveal liens on entities you didn't even know existed at that location.

0 coins

We started using a combination approach - manual searches for obvious variations plus Certana.ai to verify document consistency. The tool caught several name mismatches between our corporate due diligence docs and UCC filings that we would have missed otherwise. Worth the extra step for larger deals.

0 coins

Royal_GM_Mark

•

How does the verification process work exactly? Do you upload all the documents at once?

0 coins

Yeah you can upload the Articles of Incorporation and any UCC filings you find, then it cross-checks all the debtor names and flags inconsistencies. Much faster than manually comparing everything.

0 coins

Idaho's system definitely needs an upgrade. I've had cases where adding or removing a single space in the debtor name completely changes the search results. Very frustrating when you're trying to be thorough.

0 coins

Chris King

•

Have you tried contacting the Secretary of State's office about this? Maybe they could improve the search functionality.

0 coins

I mentioned it during a filing but they said the exact match requirement is intentional to ensure accuracy. Still seems like they could add a fuzzy search option though.

0 coins

Rachel Clark

•

For what it's worth, this issue isn't unique to Idaho. We see similar problems in several states that require exact name matches. The key is having a systematic approach to generate all possible name variations before you start searching.

0 coins

Which other states have you found to be particularly problematic for name matching?

0 coins

Mia Alvarez

•

Any chance you could share your systematic approach? We're always looking to improve our search protocols.

0 coins

Carter Holmes

•

Bottom line - budget extra time for UCC searches in Idaho and states with similar exact-match requirements. Better to spend a few extra hours on comprehensive searching than to miss a critical lien that derails your transaction.

0 coins

Sophia Long

•

Absolutely agree. The cost of thorough searching is always less than the cost of missing something important.

0 coins

We learned this lesson the hard way. Now UCC searches are a separate line item in our due diligence budget with adequate time allocated.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today