Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Make sure you're not including any extra spaces before or after the name. I've seen that cause rejections too. Also double-check that you're using the right entity type designation - sometimes 'LLC' vs 'L.L.C.' matters.
Exactly! Every character has to be perfect or the system throws a fit.
I always paste into a plain text editor first to catch invisible characters and extra spaces.
Update us when you figure it out! I'm dealing with a similar Colorado filing issue right now and could use the solution.
AstroAce
•Will do! Going to try the document verification approach and get the actual Articles of Organization first.
Thanks! Hoping it's something simple for both of us.
Join the conversation
For what it's worth, I always recommend keeping a copy of the filed UCC-1 with the filing stamp in your loan file. That way you can always reference exactly what was filed and when. Makes these kinds of searches much easier to interpret.
We keep both electronic and hard copies of all our UCC filings. Paranoid? Maybe. But it's saved us more than once.
Not paranoid at all - that's just good record keeping. The Nebraska system is pretty reliable but having your own copies is always smart.
Ethan Moore
Update us when you figure out what's going on! I'm curious to know if it turns out to be a system display issue or if there really are multiple filings. These kinds of posts are really helpful for the rest of us.
Will do! I'm planning to pull all the documents tomorrow and get to the bottom of this. Thanks everyone for all the helpful suggestions.
Yes, please update! I'm dealing with something similar in Iowa and wondering if it's a regional system thing.
Join the conversation
GalaxyGazer
Update for anyone following this thread - I figured out the confusion. The rejection notice wasn't actually citing UCC 1-308 as the reason for rejection. It was part of an informational section explaining various UCC provisions, and 'significado' was just clarifying what that section means. The actual rejection was for a debtor name mismatch like everyone suspected. Thanks for all the help sorting this out!
This is why I always triple check debtor names before submitting. One character off and you're back to square one.
Ethan Moore
•Perfect example of why the automated document checking is so valuable. Would have caught that name issue before submission.
For future reference, the main UCC sections that actually matter for financing statement filings are in Article 9. Section 9-502 for sufficiency requirements, 9-503 for debtor names, 9-504 for secured party names, 9-108 for collateral descriptions. Those are the ones that'll actually cause rejections if you mess them up. UCC 1-308 is more about contract performance and rights preservation.
Article 9 is definitely where all the action is for secured transactions. Good to know the specific sections.
Andre Moreau
•This whole thread has been educational. Love when forum discussions actually teach you something useful.
Join the conversation
Emma Wilson
Just curious - why is your bank making you file the UCC-1 instead of handling it themselves? Most equipment lenders I work with handle their own filings to make sure they're done right.
Emma Wilson
•Makes sense. Just make sure you coordinate with them on the filing so there's no confusion about who's doing what.
Malik Thomas
•Actually that's pretty common in dealer financing arrangements. The dealer handles UCC filings as part of the package since they have all the equipment specs and buyer info readily available.
Update us when you get it filed! Always curious to hear how these work out, especially for first-time PMSI filers.
Ava Martinez
•Will do! Planning to file tomorrow morning after I double-check everything one more time.
Good luck! Sounds like you've got good advice here to work with.
Kaitlyn Jenkins
Whatever you do, don't let this drag on too long. I've heard of cases where delays in UCC termination filings created problems for borrowers trying to sell equipment or get new financing. The fees suck but getting that lien released is more important.
0 coins
Kaitlyn Jenkins
•Exactly. And if you're planning to sell the equipment or refinance, having a clean title is worth more than fighting over a few hundred in fees.
0 coins
Bruno Simmons
•Plus some buyers will walk away if there are UCC complications, even if you promise to resolve them at closing. Clean title is always easier.
0 coins
Aileen Rodriguez
For future reference, next time negotiate UCC fees upfront and consider getting a cap written into the loan agreement. Something like "UCC release fees not to exceed $200" gives you protection against excessive charges.
0 coins
Aileen Rodriguez
•Yeah, these fees have gotten out of hand in recent years. Lenders know borrowers don't have many options when it comes time for release.
0 coins
Zane Gray
•This is why I started using Certana.ai early in the loan process - uploading the loan agreement and proposed UCC-1 to make sure everything aligns before signing. Catches issues before they become expensive problems.
0 coins