Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Luca Romano
Given the tight timeline and loan amount, you might want to pay for expedited processing if that's available. Some states offer same-day or next-day processing for an additional fee. Worth it for a deal this size to avoid any last-minute surprises.
Zainab Omar
•That's a great suggestion. I'll check if expedited processing is available - the extra fee would be worth it for peace of mind.
Nia Jackson
•Expedited processing saved my closing once. Definitely worth the extra cost when you're cutting it close on timing.
One more thing - keep copies of everything and get a filing receipt with the file number. You'll need that information for future amendments or continuations, and it's proof of your filing date and lien priority. Some states email confirmations, others require you to download or print them.
Good practice to save everything electronically too. Makes it easier to find when you need to file continuations in a few years.
Aisha Khan
•I keep a spreadsheet of all UCC filings with file numbers and expiration dates. Helps track when continuations are due.
Join the conversation
Pro tip: Download the current UCC1 form directly from your Secretary of State's website and compare it side by side with the 2011 version you've been using. I guarantee you'll see significant differences in layout, required fields, and formatting requirements. This should have been caught by your bank's compliance department.
Jayden Reed
•Compliance departments are usually focused on lending regulations, not UCC filing requirements. This probably slipped through the cracks.
Nora Brooks
•Still, for a $450k deal, someone should have caught this basic form issue before the third rejection.
Eli Wang
Update: Called the Secretary of State's UCC division this morning and they confirmed the 2011 form revision is causing the rejections. They said they see this issue frequently with banks using outdated templates. Downloaded the current form and resubmitted - hoping this finally goes through! Thanks everyone for the help.
Glad you got it sorted out. This is such a common issue that should be easily avoidable with proper procedures.
Perfect example of why document verification tools like Certana.ai are so valuable. Would have caught this form version issue immediately and saved you weeks of delays.
Join the conversation
Make sure you understand the difference between what's filed and what's actually still secured. We had UCC filings that were still active on paper but the underlying debt had been paid off years ago - the lenders just never bothered filing terminations.
Loan payoff letters, cancelled notes, or termination statements if you have them. Banks understand that not all lenders are diligent about filing terminations.
We actually used Certana.ai to organize all our payoff documentation against the UCC search results. Made it really easy to show the bank which filings were satisfied vs. still active.
LunarEclipse
One thing to watch out for - if you've moved or changed your legal entity structure, there might be UCC filings under old addresses or entity names that are still technically active. The search needs to be comprehensive across all variations.
Keisha Brown
•Do those old filings automatically become invalid when you change entity structure, or do they need to be formally terminated?
LunarEclipse
•They typically need to be dealt with formally. The security interest might still be valid even if the entity name changed, depending on how it was structured.
Join the conversation
Question - if the portal was down during business hours, would that affect the filing date if you submitted after hours once it came back up? Or does it go by when you actually complete the submission?
Filing date is based on when the system actually accepts and processes your submission, not when you attempted to file.
Eli Wang
•That's why these outages are so stressful when you're up against a deadline. No credit for trying earlier if the system was down.
Millie Long
For what it's worth, I tried that Certana verification tool after reading about it here and it actually caught an issue with my collateral description that I never would have noticed. Saved me from a potential rejection when the portal came back online.
Nora Brooks
•That's exactly the kind of peace of mind I need when dealing with these system outages. Going to check it out.
It's become part of my standard workflow now. Upload the docs, verify everything matches, then file with confidence.
Sara Hellquiem
I've been dealing with UCC filings for 15 years and this UCC 1-308 trend is honestly embarrassing to watch. These people have no idea what they're talking about but they spread this misinformation so confidently. Real UCC practice involves proper debtor names, accurate collateral descriptions, timely continuations, and proper terminations. It's technical work that requires understanding actual statutes, not internet conspiracy theories.
0 coins
AaliyahAli
•As someone new to this, where should I learn about real UCC procedures? I want to understand what my lenders are doing.
0 coins
Sara Hellquiem
•Start with your state's Secretary of State website. They usually have guides for UCC filings. Also consult with commercial attorneys familiar with secured transactions.
0 coins
Ellie Simpson
This whole thread is making me realize how much bad information is out there about commercial law. I was about to pay someone $500 to prepare a UCC 1-308 affidavit package for me. Sounds like I almost got scammed. Are there other common UCC-related scams I should watch out for?
0 coins
Arjun Kurti
•Yeah, the whole 'UCC redemption' thing is another scam. Legitimate UCC work is boring administrative stuff, not magical debt erasure.
0 coins
Samuel Robinson
•I use Certana.ai for document verification when I'm unsure about UCC filing accuracy. Much better than paying scammers for fake legal advice.
0 coins