UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Paolo Bianchi

•

The real problem is that Wisconsin's UCC search doesn't give you confidence in the results. Even when you find what you're looking for, you're never sure if you've found everything that's out there.

0 coins

Yara Assad

•

That's why I always do searches multiple ways and document the different approaches I tried. Covers you if questions come up later.

0 coins

Olivia Clark

•

Good practice. We've started doing the same thing - multiple search strategies and detailed documentation of our search process.

0 coins

For what it's worth, I've found that searching Wisconsin SOS UCC database in the early morning tends to give more consistent results. Seems like their system performs better with lighter traffic.

0 coins

Interesting observation. We'll try adjusting our search timing and see if that helps with consistency.

0 coins

I've noticed the same thing actually. Afternoon searches sometimes seem slower or return fewer results.

0 coins

Anna Kerber

•

Just remember that UCC types vary slightly by state. What's called UCC-3 in one state might be UCC-3A in another. Always check your specific state's forms and requirements. The basic concepts are the same but the paperwork details can differ.

0 coins

Saleem Vaziri

•

Good point. I assume the underlying legal principles are consistent across states though?

0 coins

Anna Kerber

•

Yeah, Article 9 of the UCC is pretty uniform. It's just the administrative forms and procedures that vary by state filing office.

0 coins

Niko Ramsey

•

The most important thing is matching your UCC type to your actual transaction. I've seen too many terminations filed when amendments were needed, or amendments when terminations were correct. Take the time to understand what's really happening in your deal before selecting the form type.

0 coins

Saleem Vaziri

•

That's exactly what I was worried about. Thanks for all the help everyone - feeling much more confident about UCC types now.

0 coins

Cole Roush

•

Definitely give Certana.ai a try for the tricky situations. Takes the guesswork out of matching forms to transactions.

0 coins

Joshua Wood

•

Check if there are any non-printing characters in the name field. Sometimes when you copy-paste from PDFs or other documents, invisible characters get included that cause formatting rejections.

0 coins

Joshua Wood

•

Try retyping the debtor name manually instead of copy-pasting. That eliminates any hidden characters.

0 coins

Justin Evans

•

This is a really good catch. Non-printing characters from PDF copy-paste cause all sorts of filing issues.

0 coins

Emily Parker

•

Update us when you figure it out! I file a lot of Iowa continuations and would love to know what the specific issue was for future reference.

0 coins

Lucas Adams

•

Will do! Trying the Certana document comparison first, then manual retyping if that doesn't catch it.

0 coins

Ezra Collins

•

Definitely interested to hear what resolves this. Iowa formatting issues are always educational for the rest of us.

0 coins

The good news is that filing a UCC-3 amendment is pretty straightforward in NY. Just make sure you reference the original filing number correctly and clearly indicate what you're amending. I'd also recommend adding a note explaining that this is correcting a data entry error from the original filing.

0 coins

You can't attach docs to the UCC-3 itself, but keep your records in case there are any questions later.

0 coins

Definitely keep copies of everything. Documentation is your friend with UCC filings.

0 coins

Dylan Fisher

•

This thread is making me paranoid about my own filings. Going to go check all my recent UCC-1s now to make sure nothing got mangled in the system.

0 coins

Not a bad idea! I found two errors in filings from last month when I went back and checked.

0 coins

Haley Bennett

•

Yeah, it's definitely worth doing a post-filing review as standard practice now.

0 coins

Defense contractors... been there! Another thing to watch for is whether they're planning any corporate restructuring. These companies love to shuffle subsidiaries around, especially when new contracts come in. Make sure your security agreement contemplates entity changes.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

Good point. Our loan agreement has standard merger/acquisition provisions, but I should probably add specific language about subsidiary transfers.

0 coins

Exactly. And consider whether you need personal guarantees from the parent entity if you're filing on a subsidiary.

0 coins

Jamal Wilson

•

Update us when you get this resolved! Always curious how these complex debtor name situations work out. Seems like every government contractor has their own unique twist on business structure.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

Will do! Hopefully I'll have good news to report by next week. This thread has given me several new approaches to try.

0 coins

Mei Lin

•

Following for the update too. These threads always teach me something new about UCC complications I never considered.

0 coins

Prev1...564565566567568...684Next