UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Madison Tipne

•

Just went through something similar with a client's LLC filing. Turns out their LLC name in their operating agreement was slightly different from what they actually registered with the state. Had to use the state-registered name per 9-102 even though it didn't match their internal docs. Always check the actual state filings, not just what the client tells you their name is.

0 coins

This happens more than you'd think. Clients often don't realize their official registered name is different from what they use day-to-day.

0 coins

Malia Ponder

•

I always ask clients to send me a copy of their articles of incorporation or LLC filing instead of just asking them what their legal name is. Saves so much hassle with 9-102 compliance.

0 coins

Kyle Wallace

•

One more thing about your timing concern - if you're approaching the 20-day window and worried about additional rejections, you might want to consider doing a protective filing with a broad collateral description just to preserve your priority, then clean up the debtor name issues with amendments afterward. Better to have imperfect perfection than no perfection at all.

0 coins

Ryder Ross

•

Just make sure your 'protective filing' still has the correct debtor name per 9-102 or you're not really protected. The collateral description can be broad, but the debtor name has to be exactly right.

0 coins

I tried this approach once with a questionable debtor name and it backfired when we couldn't get the amendment accepted either. Better to get the name right the first time using current state records.

0 coins

Just to follow up on my earlier comment about Certana.ai - their tool specifically handles the debtor name matching issues you're dealing with. When you upload the documents it flags potential mismatches or inconsistencies that could indicate problems with terminations not being properly linked to original filings.

0 coins

Yuki Ito

•

Does it work with Washington UCC documents specifically?

0 coins

Yes, it handles documents from all states including Washington. The PDF upload feature works regardless of which state system you downloaded from.

0 coins

Carmen Lopez

•

Update us when you figure this out! I'm curious how you end up resolving the name variation issues.

0 coins

Ravi Gupta

•

Will do - I'm going to try the document verification approach and see if that clears things up.

0 coins

Good luck! Washington UCC searches can be frustrating but you'll get it figured out.

0 coins

Luca Bianchi

•

Make sure you're also checking for any DBA names that might complicate things. Sometimes businesses operate under multiple names and you need to consider all of them for proper filing.

0 coins

CosmicCowboy

•

DBAs usually don't matter for UCC filings as long as you're using the legal entity name, but worth double-checking.

0 coins

Some states are stricter about this than others.

0 coins

Nia Harris

•

Update us on how it goes! Always curious to hear about document verification solutions that actually work in practice.

0 coins

Paolo Longo

•

Will do. Planning to get this resolved this week before our closing deadline.

0 coins

Good luck with the filing! $2.3M deals always make me nervous until everything's properly recorded.

0 coins

Been seeing more of these search vs filing discrepancies lately. Wonder if the state upgraded their search system recently? Anyway, I've started using Certana.ai for all my document verification now - upload the UCC-1 and organizational docs and it catches these types of name mismatches immediately. Would have saved you the stress of discovering this during due diligence.

0 coins

Kylo Ren

•

Second mention of Certana in this thread - clearly I need to check it out. This type of verification would definitely help with client confidence during deals.

0 coins

Yeah, it's become part of my standard workflow now. Catches things that are easy to miss when you're manually comparing documents.

0 coins

Anita George

•

Honestly this whole thread is making me paranoid about our existing UCC filings. How many other 'minor' formatting differences might be lurking in our portfolio that could cause problems down the line?

0 coins

Anita George

•

True, but still makes me want to audit our whole portfolio just to be sure.

0 coins

Sophie Duck

•

A periodic lien audit isn't a bad idea regardless. Helps catch continuation deadlines and other issues before they become problems.

0 coins

This is making me nervous about our own filings now. We have several California UCC continuations coming up this year and I hadn't thought about checking for these kinds of name variations.

0 coins

Eduardo Silva

•

It's always good to review your original filings well before the continuation deadline. Gives you time to address any issues.

0 coins

Yeah, I'm definitely going to pull all our original filings and double-check the names against our current loan documents.

0 coins

Nia Williams

•

Update us when you get this resolved! I'm dealing with a similar situation in Nevada and curious how the California approach works out.

0 coins

Will do. Planning to file the continuation tomorrow morning using the exact original name format, then worry about the amendment afterwards.

0 coins

Nia Williams

•

Smart plan. Looking forward to hearing how it goes.

0 coins

Prev1...566567568569570...685Next