


Ask the community...
Just to follow up on my earlier comment about Certana.ai - their tool specifically handles the debtor name matching issues you're dealing with. When you upload the documents it flags potential mismatches or inconsistencies that could indicate problems with terminations not being properly linked to original filings.
Does it work with Washington UCC documents specifically?
Update us when you figure this out! I'm curious how you end up resolving the name variation issues.
Will do - I'm going to try the document verification approach and see if that clears things up.
Make sure you're also checking for any DBA names that might complicate things. Sometimes businesses operate under multiple names and you need to consider all of them for proper filing.
DBAs usually don't matter for UCC filings as long as you're using the legal entity name, but worth double-checking.
Update us on how it goes! Always curious to hear about document verification solutions that actually work in practice.
Will do. Planning to get this resolved this week before our closing deadline.
Been seeing more of these search vs filing discrepancies lately. Wonder if the state upgraded their search system recently? Anyway, I've started using Certana.ai for all my document verification now - upload the UCC-1 and organizational docs and it catches these types of name mismatches immediately. Would have saved you the stress of discovering this during due diligence.
Honestly this whole thread is making me paranoid about our existing UCC filings. How many other 'minor' formatting differences might be lurking in our portfolio that could cause problems down the line?
True, but still makes me want to audit our whole portfolio just to be sure.
A periodic lien audit isn't a bad idea regardless. Helps catch continuation deadlines and other issues before they become problems.
This is making me nervous about our own filings now. We have several California UCC continuations coming up this year and I hadn't thought about checking for these kinds of name variations.
Update us when you get this resolved! I'm dealing with a similar situation in Nevada and curious how the California approach works out.
Will do. Planning to file the continuation tomorrow morning using the exact original name format, then worry about the amendment afterwards.
Smart plan. Looking forward to hearing how it goes.
Madison Tipne
Just went through something similar with a client's LLC filing. Turns out their LLC name in their operating agreement was slightly different from what they actually registered with the state. Had to use the state-registered name per 9-102 even though it didn't match their internal docs. Always check the actual state filings, not just what the client tells you their name is.
0 coins
Holly Lascelles
•This happens more than you'd think. Clients often don't realize their official registered name is different from what they use day-to-day.
0 coins
Malia Ponder
•I always ask clients to send me a copy of their articles of incorporation or LLC filing instead of just asking them what their legal name is. Saves so much hassle with 9-102 compliance.
0 coins
Kyle Wallace
One more thing about your timing concern - if you're approaching the 20-day window and worried about additional rejections, you might want to consider doing a protective filing with a broad collateral description just to preserve your priority, then clean up the debtor name issues with amendments afterward. Better to have imperfect perfection than no perfection at all.
0 coins
Ryder Ross
•Just make sure your 'protective filing' still has the correct debtor name per 9-102 or you're not really protected. The collateral description can be broad, but the debtor name has to be exactly right.
0 coins
Gianni Serpent
•I tried this approach once with a questionable debtor name and it backfired when we couldn't get the amendment accepted either. Better to get the name right the first time using current state records.
0 coins