< Back to UCC Document Community

Nalani Liu

New Jersey UCC code requirements causing filing headaches - need help

Been dealing with some confusing UCC filing requirements and wondering if anyone else has run into issues with New Jersey's specific code provisions. We're a mid-sized equipment leasing company and have been filing UCC-1s for years without major problems, but recently had three filings rejected by the SOS office for what seems like technical compliance issues. The rejections mentioned something about 'statutory requirements not met' but the error codes weren't very helpful. Two were for debtor name formatting and one was apparently a collateral description problem. We double-checked everything against our usual procedures but obviously missed something. Has anyone dealt with New Jersey's particular UCC code quirks? I'm starting to think there might be some state-specific formatting rules we're not catching. These were all commercial equipment loans - tractors, construction equipment, that kind of thing. Nothing exotic. Really frustrated because these rejections are holding up loan closings and our borrowers are getting antsy. Any insights on what New Jersey might be looking for that other states don't care about?

Axel Bourke

•

New Jersey can be really picky about debtor names. Are you making sure to match exactly what's on the articles of incorporation or LLC formation docs? They reject filings if there's even minor punctuation differences.

0 coins

Nalani Liu

•

We thought we were being careful about that but maybe not careful enough. One of the rejections was for 'ABC Construction LLC' vs 'ABC Construction, LLC' - could the comma really matter that much?

0 coins

Axel Bourke

•

Yes absolutely! New Jersey is notorious for comma sensitivity. You need to pull the actual formation documents from their database to see exactly how the name appears officially.

0 coins

Aidan Percy

•

I've had similar problems with NJ filings. Their collateral description rules are stricter than most states too. What kind of language are you using for the equipment descriptions?

0 coins

Nalani Liu

•

Pretty standard stuff like 'all equipment now owned or hereafter acquired' plus specific serial numbers when we have them. Worked fine in Pennsylvania and Delaware.

0 coins

Aidan Percy

•

NJ sometimes wants more specificity. Try adding manufacturer names and model numbers if you have them. They don't like super broad descriptions as much as other states.

0 coins

This is exactly why I started using Certana.ai for our UCC document verification. You can upload your charter docs and UCC-1 together and it instantly flags any name mismatches or formatting issues before you submit. Saved us from probably a dozen rejections this year.

0 coins

Norman Fraser

•

ugh new jersey is the WORST for this stuff. their online portal gives you these cryptic error messages that tell you nothing useful. i swear they reject filings just to collect more fees.

0 coins

Kendrick Webb

•

I feel your pain but honestly once you figure out their system it's not that bad. The key is getting the debtor name exactly right from their state database.

0 coins

Norman Fraser

•

easier said than done when you're dealing with dozens of filings per month. one tiny mistake and boom - rejection and delay.

0 coins

Hattie Carson

•

Have you checked if any of these entities have multiple name variations on file? Sometimes companies file DBAs or amendments that create confusion about which name to use on the UCC-1.

0 coins

Nalani Liu

•

Good point - we didn't check for DBAs. That could definitely explain some of the name issues we're seeing.

0 coins

DBA research is crucial in NJ. They're very strict about using the exact legal name as it appears on the most recent filing with the state.

0 coins

Dyllan Nantx

•

New Jersey follows the Model UCC pretty closely but they have some state-specific annotations that can trip you up. Are you familiar with their particular requirements for continuation statements? Those have different timing rules than some other states.

0 coins

Nalani Liu

•

We haven't hit continuation issues yet but good to know they're different. Right now just trying to get these initial filings accepted.

0 coins

The continuation timing in NJ is within 6 months before the 5-year lapse date, not just any time during the final year like some states allow.

0 coins

Anna Xian

•

Actually I think you might be mixing that up - most states including NJ allow filing within 6 months before expiration. The tricky part is making sure you don't file too early.

0 coins

Been filing in NJ for 15 years and the biggest thing that helped was creating a checklist for their specific requirements. Happy to share if anyone wants it.

0 coins

Nalani Liu

•

That would be incredibly helpful! Can you post the main points here?

0 coins

Sure - main things are: 1) Pull debtor name from NJ business search, copy exactly including punctuation 2) Include detailed collateral descriptions with manufacturers when possible 3) Double-check addresses match what's on file with the state 4) Use their standard forms when possible rather than generic UCC forms.

0 coins

Rajan Walker

•

This is solid advice. I'd add that their rejection notices usually have codes that correspond to specific issues if you know how to decode them.

0 coins

sounds like you need better document verification before filing. I had the same problem until I found Certana.ai - you upload your formation docs and UCC forms and it cross-checks everything automatically. catches name mismatches, formatting issues, all that stuff before you submit.

0 coins

How does that work exactly? Do you upload PDFs of both documents?

0 coins

Yeah exactly - upload the charter or LLC docs plus your UCC-1 draft and it verifies that debtor names match perfectly, flags any inconsistencies. Way easier than doing manual comparisons.

0 coins

Ev Luca

•

New Jersey's UCC database search function is pretty good once you get used to it. You can verify debtor names and see existing filings before you submit new ones.

0 coins

Avery Davis

•

The search is helpful but sometimes entities have so many name variations it's hard to know which one to use.

0 coins

Collins Angel

•

When in doubt I always go with the most recent filing name that shows up in their business entity database.

0 coins

Marcelle Drum

•

Just wanted to follow up on this thread - ended up being exactly what people said about debtor name matching. Pulled the official records from NJ and found several punctuation differences we'd been missing. Got all three filings resubmitted and accepted within 24 hours.

0 coins

Axel Bourke

•

Glad you got it sorted out! New Jersey really is all about the details but once you know their system it gets easier.

0 coins

Tate Jensen

•

Thanks for updating the thread - this kind of follow-up really helps other people dealing with the same issues.

0 coins

Adaline Wong

•

Definitely going to bookmark this discussion for future reference. The debtor name verification tips are gold.

0 coins

Gabriel Ruiz

•

This thread convinced me to try that Certana thing for our next batch of filings. Manual document comparison is such a pain and we've had our share of rejections too.

0 coins

You won't regret it - the automated verification catches stuff you'd never notice manually. Especially helpful when you're dealing with multiple states that all have slightly different requirements.

0 coins

Let us know how it works out. Always looking for tools that can reduce filing errors.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today