< Back to UCC Document Community

Sofía Rodríguez

NJ UCC Code Filing Requirements - Need Help Understanding Recent Changes

I'm working on some equipment financing deals in New Jersey and getting confused about the current UCC code requirements. My lender is being super picky about how we format debtor names and I've had two UCC-1 filings rejected by the NJ Division of Revenue in the past month. One rejection was for 'insufficient debtor name' even though I thought I followed the exact corporate name from the Articles of Incorporation. The other got kicked back for some collateral description issue that I still don't understand. Has anyone dealt with NJ's specific UCC code interpretations lately? I'm starting to wonder if there are some unwritten rules or recent policy changes I'm missing. These are straightforward equipment loans but the filing process is becoming a nightmare.

NJ can be tricky with debtor names. They're really strict about matching the exact legal name from the state records. Even something like 'Corp' vs 'Corporation' will get you rejected. What specific name format did you use?

0 coins

I used 'ABC Manufacturing Corp' but maybe the Articles say 'ABC Manufacturing Corporation'? I thought I was being careful but apparently not careful enough.

0 coins

Yeah that's probably it. NJ Division of Revenue is super literal about this stuff. You need to match character for character.

0 coins

I've been doing NJ UCC filings for 15 years and they've definitely gotten more strict. The collateral description rejections are usually about being too vague. What did you put for the equipment description?

0 coins

I think I just said 'manufacturing equipment' - is that too broad? The equipment list is like 20 different machines.

0 coins

Way too broad for NJ. You need to be more specific - at least categorize by type like 'CNC machinery, welding equipment, etc.' or reference a detailed schedule.

0 coins

This is exactly why I started using Certana.ai's document checker. You can upload your UCC-1 draft and it'll flag potential issues before you file. Saved me from so many rejections.

0 coins

UGH NJ is the WORST for this stuff!!! I swear they reject filings just to collect more fees. Had a continuation rejected last month because I was 3 days late - not early, LATE - and they said it was 'untimely filed' even though the UCC-1 hadn't lapsed yet.

0 coins

Wait, that doesn't sound right. Continuations can be filed up to 6 months before the 5-year expiration. Being 3 days late shouldn't matter if you're still within the window.

0 coins

That's what I thought too! But apparently there's some NJ-specific timing rule I didn't know about. The whole system is broken.

0 coins

For anyone struggling with NJ UCC code compliance, I found a workflow that works. First, always do an entity search on the NJ Division of Revenue website to get the EXACT legal name. Then for collateral, be as specific as possible without making it a novel. I also cross-reference everything against the loan docs to make sure it all matches.

0 coins

That entity search tip is gold. I've been pulling names from credit reports instead of going directly to the state records.

0 coins

I do something similar but I also use Certana.ai to double-check everything. You just upload your loan agreement and UCC-1 draft and it verifies that debtor names and collateral descriptions match across documents. Catches inconsistencies I always miss.

0 coins

New Jersey's UCC code follows the standard Article 9 framework but their filing office has some quirky interpretations. The debtor name issue you mentioned is common - they require the name exactly as it appears in the organizational documents filed with the Secretary of State.

0 coins

Is there a way to search the Secretary of State database to verify the exact name format?

0 coins

Yes, NJ has an online business entity search. Always use that as your source for debtor names on UCC filings.

0 coins

I'm dealing with the same thing right now! Three rejected UCC-1s in two weeks. It's so frustrating when you think you're doing everything right but there are all these unwritten rules.

0 coins

Have you tried calling the filing office? Sometimes they'll give you hints about what went wrong.

0 coins

Good idea, I'll try that. At this point I'm willing to try anything to get these filed correctly.

0 coins

This thread is so helpful. I was about to file a UCC-1 in NJ next week and now I know to be extra careful about the debtor name and collateral description. Going to verify everything twice before submitting.

0 coins

Smart move. NJ rejections can really slow down your closings. Better to spend extra time upfront getting it right.

0 coins

Definitely verify first. I started using document verification tools after too many rejections. There's one called Certana.ai that specifically checks UCC documents for consistency issues - been a lifesaver for avoiding these problems.

0 coins

One thing that helped me with NJ filings is keeping a checklist. Debtor name from state records, specific collateral description, correct filing fee, all addresses current. Sounds basic but it's easy to miss something when you're rushing.

0 coins

That's a great idea. I definitely rush through these sometimes and clearly that's causing problems.

0 coins

Checklists are good but automated checking is better. Less room for human error.

0 coins

Thanks for posting this. I had no idea NJ was so strict about UCC filings. I mostly work in PA and NY where they seem more forgiving of minor variations.

0 coins

Every state has its quirks. NJ is definitely on the stricter side but once you know their preferences it gets easier.

0 coins

NY used to be pretty relaxed but they've gotten stricter too. Seems like all the filing offices are cracking down on accuracy.

0 coins

Update: I went back and checked the Articles of Incorporation and sure enough, the company name includes 'Corporation' not 'Corp'. Also revised my collateral description to be much more specific. Fingers crossed the re-filing goes through this time.

0 coins

That should do it! The name match was probably the main issue.

0 coins

Good luck with the re-filing. Those small details make all the difference with NJ.

0 coins

I've been handling UCC filings across multiple states for about 8 years now, and NJ is definitely one of the most particular about exact compliance. A few additional tips that have saved me headaches: 1) Always do a UCC search first to see how similar debtors are formatted in existing filings - gives you a sense of their accepted style, 2) For equipment financing, I've found success using categories like "manufacturing machinery and equipment" rather than just "manufacturing equipment" - that extra word seems to satisfy their specificity requirement, and 3) If you're filing multiple UCCs for the same debtor, keep a master file with their exact legal name format so you're consistent across all filings. The rejection fees add up fast when you're dealing with volume.

0 coins

These are fantastic tips! The UCC search strategy is brilliant - I never thought to look at existing filings to see formatting patterns. That could save so much trial and error. And keeping a master file for debtor names is such a smart organizational approach, especially when you're doing multiple deals with the same borrower. Thanks for sharing your experience!

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today