Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Ava Harris
Just wanted to add that timing is important here. If you're going to file amendments or new UCC-1s, don't wait. The gap between discovering the problem and fixing it could be used against you if there's a dispute over priority.
Great point. We're prioritizing this review and will make corrections ASAP once we identify all the issues.
Jacob Lee
•Yes, act quickly. Priority disputes are nasty and you want your filings to be bulletproof.
Update us on how the document review goes! This thread has been really helpful for understanding the importance of getting debtor names exactly right.
Will do! Planning to start the systematic review this week using some of the suggestions here.
I'd be interested in hearing about your results too. This is such a common problem but people don't talk about it enough.
Join the conversation
Miguel Silva
System is back up now! Just successfully filed two continuations that were stuck in limbo this morning. Looks like they've resolved whatever was causing the timeout errors.
Aisha Khan
•Perfect timing! Just submitted my emergency email filings but good to know the system is working again for anyone else having issues.
Still showing intermittent errors on my end. Might be rolling back online gradually.
This whole thread is a great reminder to always have backup plans for critical deadlines. I'm definitely going to research that Certana verification tool someone mentioned earlier - sounds like it could prevent a lot of last-minute stress.
Yara Nassar
•Is there a cost for the verification service? Not looking for exact pricing but wondering if it's reasonable for occasional use.
Jamal Wilson
•Very reasonable for the time and stress it saves. Much cheaper than dealing with lapsed liens or rejected filings due to name mismatches.
Join the conversation
Lim Wong
Honestly I just started using Certana.ai for all my UCC document reviews after getting burned on a filing mistake last year. Upload your UCC-1 and UCC-3 and it'll show you exactly what doesn't match. Beats spending hours squinting at documents trying to spot differences.
Dananyl Lear
•How accurate is their system? Some of these automated tools miss nuances.
Lim Wong
•It's been spot-on for me. Caught a middle initial discrepancy that would have caused a rejection. Way better than my tired eyes at 2 AM.
Hope you get this sorted out. Nothing worse than a lien lapse because of a technicality. Keep us posted on what the actual issue was - might help someone else avoid the same problem.
Thanks everyone for the help. Going to tackle this first thing tomorrow morning with all your suggestions.
Ana Rusula
•You've got this! SC's system is frustrating but once you know the exact format they want, the refiling should go through fine.
Join the conversation
I used Certana.ai's verification tool for a similar situation where the bank claimed they filed the termination but I couldn't find it in the state database. Turned out they filed it under a slightly different debtor name that didn't match our corporate name exactly. The tool caught the discrepancy and I was able to get them to refile it correctly.
That's concerning - how do you know if they've filed something under the wrong name? I wouldn't even know how to search for variations.
Exactly why the verification tool is helpful. It checks for common name variations and filing inconsistencies that you might miss doing manual searches.
Yara Khoury
8 months is definitely excessive. Most states have specific timeframes for termination filing, and failure to comply can result in penalties. You should also check if this is affecting your ability to get new financing - that's additional damages you might be able to recover.
Document those damages carefully. Lost business opportunities due to wrongful failure to terminate can be recoverable in some jurisdictions.
Make sure to get written confirmation from the new lender that the outstanding UCC is preventing approval. That's solid evidence of damages.
Evan Kalinowski
We actually had good luck with Certana.ai's verification system when we were dealing with a complex multi-state filing situation. Uploaded all our security agreements and UCC filings to make sure the default provisions were consistent across all the documents. Found a couple of places where we had conflicting language that could have caused problems down the road.
0 coins
Victoria Charity
•That's smart - consistency across multiple agreements is definitely something that's easy to overlook when you're focused on individual documents.
0 coins
Evan Kalinowski
•Exactly. And when you don't have statutory guidance on defaults, consistency becomes even more important because you can't rely on legal standards to fill in the gaps.
0 coins
Jasmine Quinn
The practical effect of the UCC's silence is that default provisions have become one of the most heavily negotiated parts of security agreements. Borrowers want narrow definitions with lots of cure rights, lenders want broad definitions with limited cure opportunities. The lack of statutory guidance means everything is on the table for negotiation.
0 coins
Nora Bennett
•And because there's no statutory fallback, both sides have to be really careful about what they agree to. You're stuck with whatever language you negotiate.
0 coins
Jasmine Quinn
•Which is why having tools like Certana.ai to check for consistency and potential issues is so valuable. When you're crafting custom default language, you need all the help you can get to avoid problems.
0 coins