UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Ethan Wilson

Where to file a UCC financing statement - different state requirements?

I'm handling my first equipment financing deal and need to file UCC-1 statements to perfect our security interest. The borrower has operations in multiple states and I'm getting conflicting information about where to file the UCC financing statement. Some people say it's where the debtor is incorporated, others say where the collateral is located. The equipment will be used across three different states but the company is incorporated in Delaware. I've been going in circles with the SOS websites and each one seems to have different requirements. Can someone clarify the proper filing location for a UCC financing statement? I don't want to mess this up and leave our lien unperfected.

I've used the Delaware system many times and it's pretty user-friendly. Make sure you have the debtor's exact legal name and address from their corporate records. The system is picky about formatting.

0 coins

I'll pull their certificate of incorporation to make sure I have everything exact. Thanks for the tip.

0 coins

That's exactly what I was talking about with the document verification. Those little details can kill a filing if you're not careful.

0 coins

One more thing - keep copies of everything and calendar your continuation deadline. Nothing worse than having a lapse because you forgot to continue the filing.

0 coins

Smart. I usually set multiple reminders starting 6 months out just to be safe.

0 coins

That's a good practice. Clients don't like finding out their security interest lapsed.

0 coins

Finley Garrett

UCC Filing Help - What is security agreement ree680109-sa and how does it connect to my UCC-1?

I'm preparing to file a UCC-1 and came across this document reference 'security agreement ree680109-sa' in our loan paperwork. The lender mentioned it during closing but I'm not sure how this specific security agreement ties into the UCC filing process. We're securing equipment financing for $285,000 and I want to make sure all the document references match up correctly before submitting to avoid any rejections. Has anyone dealt with similar alphanumeric security agreement codes? The debtor name on our agreement shows slightly different formatting than what's on the business charter (Inc. vs Incorporated) and I'm worried about potential mismatches. Should the security agreement number ree680109-sa be referenced anywhere in the UCC-1 filing itself?

Before you file, I'd suggest using a document verification service to double-check everything. I tried Certana.ai after someone here recommended it and it caught several inconsistencies between my security agreement and UCC-1 draft that I completely missed. Really simple - just upload your PDFs and it runs the comparison automatically. Definitely worth it for a $285k financing to avoid any filing issues.

0 coins

Two people have mentioned Certana now - sounds like it might be worth checking out before I submit the filing.

0 coins

Yeah, especially for your first time with a security agreement like ree680109-sa where you're unsure about the name formatting. Better safe than sorry with that size loan.

0 coins

Update us when you get the filing submitted! Always curious how these name matching situations work out.

0 coins

Will do! Planning to file early next week once I get everything double-checked.

0 coins

Looking forward to hearing how it goes. Sounds like you've got a good plan in place.

0 coins

Ahooker-Equator

Secretary of State UCC Lien Search showing inconsistent results - help needed

I'm running into a frustrating issue with our state's Secretary of State UCC lien search system. We're doing due diligence on a $2.8M equipment financing deal and the search results keep showing different information depending on how I enter the debtor name. When I search 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' I get 3 active liens, but 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' (with the comma) shows 5 active liens including what looks like a critical fixture filing from 2019. The debtor insists their legal name doesn't include the comma, but their articles of incorporation clearly show it does. This name variation is making me question whether we're seeing all the liens that could affect our collateral position. Has anyone dealt with Secretary of State search systems that are this sensitive to punctuation? I'm worried we might miss something important and end up with an unperfected security interest.

Here's what I do for comprehensive Secretary of State UCC searches: 1) Get certified articles of incorporation 2) Search exact legal name 3) Search without entity designation 4) Search without punctuation 5) Search any known DBAs 6) Check for name changes in corporate records 7) Search parent/subsidiary names if applicable. It's tedious but necessary.

0 coins

Great checklist! I'd add searching for any predecessor entities if there have been mergers or acquisitions.

0 coins

Good addition! Entity restructuring can definitely complicate UCC searches if you don't know the history.

0 coins

Just wanted to follow up on the Certana.ai suggestion from earlier - I tried it after seeing it mentioned and it's actually pretty slick. Uploaded the debtor's articles and a few UCC search results I wasn't sure about, and it immediately flagged that one of the liens was filed under a slightly different name format. Would have taken me forever to catch that manually. The document comparison feature is really useful for this exact type of Secretary of State search inconsistency issue.

0 coins

Does it work with all states' Secretary of State formats or just certain ones?

0 coins

It just compares the documents you upload to it, so it should work regardless of which state you're searching. It's looking at the actual text in the PDFs.

0 coins

Henry Delgado

UCC Security Agreement Requirements - What Makes It Valid and Enforceable?

I'm preparing loan documentation for a $2.8M equipment financing deal and need to make sure our security agreement will hold up if we ever need to enforce it. The collateral includes manufacturing equipment, inventory, and accounts receivable. I've seen some horror stories where lenders thought they had perfect security but couldn't collect because their agreements had fatal flaws. What are the absolute must-haves for a valid security agreement under Article 9? I know it needs to be written and signed, but I'm worried about the collateral description - how specific does it need to be? Can I just say "all equipment" or do I need serial numbers and detailed descriptions? Also, what about after-acquired property clauses? The borrower will be buying additional equipment over the next few years and I want to make sure our security interest automatically attaches to new purchases. This is keeping me up at night because getting the security agreement wrong could leave us completely unsecured on a multi-million dollar loan. Any guidance would be appreciated.

One last thing - consider whether you need any special provisions for insurance proceeds. If the equipment gets destroyed, you want to make sure your security interest continues in the insurance payout.

0 coins

I always require the lender to be named as loss payee or additional insured on the equipment policies. Gives you much better control over claims.

0 coins

Just make sure the insurance requirements are realistic. I've seen deals where the insurance costs were so high they made the project uneconomical.

0 coins

Thanks everyone, this has been incredibly helpful. I think I have a much better handle on what needs to be in the security agreement. Going to run everything through legal review before closing, but at least now I know what questions to ask. Definitely going to check out that document verification tool someone mentioned too - sounds like it could save me from making costly mistakes.

0 coins

Smart approach. Better to spend a little extra on review upfront than deal with enforceability problems later.

0 coins

Let us know how it goes! Always interested to hear about real-world applications of this stuff.

0 coins

Emma Wilson

New York UCC filing fees changed again - anyone else caught off guard?

Just got hit with unexpected costs when filing a UCC-1 continuation in NY state. Our firm handles about 50 filings monthly and I thought I had the fee structure memorized, but apparently there were some updates I missed. The standard filing went from what I expected to pay to significantly more, and now I'm wondering if we budgeted correctly for our Q1 secured transaction work. Has anyone else dealt with recent changes to New York UCC filing fees? I'm particularly concerned about continuation statements since we have about 30 coming due in the next 90 days. Need to make sure I'm not missing other fee adjustments that could impact our clients' budgets.

Pro tip: always build a small buffer into your fee quotes for clients. Government costs change and it's better to have a pleasant surprise than an awkward conversation about unexpected charges.

0 coins

Same here. Adding 'subject to change' language to all our engagement letters now.

0 coins

Smart move. Clients appreciate transparency about costs that are outside your control.

0 coins

Thanks for posting this - I handle NY filings occasionally and had no idea about the fee changes. Definitely need to update my cost calculations before the next batch of continuations.

0 coins

Glad this was helpful! I was kicking myself for not staying on top of the changes but sounds like I'm not alone.

0 coins

We all get caught by these surprise updates. The important thing is adjusting going forward and maybe building in some protection against future changes.

0 coins

Prev1...419420421422423...684Next