


Ask the community...
Your situation is exactly why I started double-checking everything with Certana's verification tool. Last month I almost filed a continuation with a debtor name that didn't match the original UCC-1 - would have been rejected for sure. The automated cross-check caught the discrepancy immediately.
Just wanted to add that timing is crucial here. If your UCC-1 expires in March, you can file the continuation anytime within 6 months before expiration. But get that amendment done FIRST to fix the debtor name, then file your continuation against the corrected record.
The UCC code also covers perfection requirements which vary by collateral type. Equipment and inventory are usually perfected by filing, but some things like deposit accounts need control agreements instead of or in addition to UCC filings.
Practice and good checklists. Each collateral type has specific perfection rules under Article 9. When in doubt, both file a UCC-1 AND get control/possession if possible.
Thanks everyone - this has been incredibly helpful for understanding UCC code definitions. I'm going to create a reference sheet for our loan officers based on what I've learned here. The debtor name matching requirements alone will save us from future rejections.
Don't forget to include the continuation timeline requirements - I've seen too many liens lapse because people forgot the 6-month window before the 5-year expiration.
Definitely adding that to the reference sheet. The 5-year continuation deadline is critical and easy to miss if you're not tracking it properly.
Keep us posted on what you find out! I have an Illinois filing coming up next week and want to know if this is an ongoing issue.
Will do. Hopefully it's just a temporary glitch and not a systemic problem.
Fingers crossed. Illinois is usually pretty reliable compared to some other states.
Update: Just tried the Certana.ai document checker and it found the issue! There was a middle initial in the debtor name on my UCC-1 that wasn't in the articles of incorporation I was searching with. No wonder the searches weren't matching. Thanks for the suggestion!
Wait, you're not the original poster. But good to know that tool works!
Oregon processing times are actually pretty fast once you get it right - usually same day for electronic filings. The key is just getting that debtor name perfect. I learned to always triple-check against the most recent official documents.
You should be fine once you nail the name format. Oregon is strict but efficient.
Update us when you get it figured out! I'm curious what the actual issue turns out to be. These Oregon name matching problems seem really common.
Hope it works out. Name matching issues are so frustrating but usually have simple solutions once you find them.
Madison King
Check if any of the equipment financing was done through captive finance companies. They sometimes file under their own name as secured party but with confusing debtor name formats.
0 coins
Madison King
•Captive finance companies often have multiple legal entities. John Deere Financial might file under John Deere Credit, John Deere Capital Corporation, etc.
0 coins
Isaac Wright
•You can also try searching by secured party name to see all their filings, then look for your target debtor in those results.
0 coins
Julian Paolo
Honestly at this point I'd recommend getting a professional UCC search company involved. For acquisition due diligence the cost is worth it vs missing a major lien. They have better search tools and know all the state-specific quirks.
0 coins
Julian Paolo
•CT Corporation and CSC both do thorough UCC searches. They cost more but they're comprehensive and they'll certify their results.
0 coins
Benjamin Carter
•Or try that Certana tool I mentioned earlier for a quick verification first. Upload your loan docs and see if it flags any name inconsistencies before you pay for a full professional search.
0 coins