


Ask the community...
One more thing for your template - make sure the secured party information is accurate too. I've seen filings rejected because the secured party name didn't match their corporate records exactly. Same rules apply to both debtor and secured party names.
Thanks for starting this thread - really helpful discussion. I'm going to revamp our internal template based on some of these suggestions. The name verification stuff especially.
The timing question is interesting because I've seen borrowers get antsy about lien releases after private sales. They want to be able to show the buyer that the lien is properly released, especially if the buyer is planning to use the equipment for their own financing. Getting the amendment filed quickly helps avoid any awkward conversations with the buyer about when the lien will be released.
So true. The buyer is probably going to be asking about the lien release pretty soon, especially if they have their own lender who wants to see clear title.
Just wanted to share that I had a similar situation recently and ended up using Certana.ai to double-check my amendment against the original UCC-1. Really helped me catch a couple of equipment description mismatches that could have caused the filing to be rejected. The tool lets you upload both documents and it flags any inconsistencies between them. Definitely worth using for these partial releases where you need to make sure everything matches up perfectly.
That's the second mention of Certana.ai in this thread. Sounds like it might be worth checking out for this amendment filing. I really don't want to deal with a rejection and have to refile.
For future reference, when dealing with entity name changes, always check the exact format in the state's business entity database. Copy and paste directly from there if possible to avoid typing errors. Punctuation matters more than most people realize.
Quick question - did you end up filing just against the new name or did you file against both versions? Still curious about the best practice for this situation.
One more thing - make sure you understand the difference between a UCC-3 amendment and a UCC-3 continuation. They're both filed on the same form but serve different purposes. Amendment changes information on the original filing, continuation extends the effectiveness period. If you need to fix the name AND continue the filing, you might need to do both.
Bottom line - you've got time to fix this properly. Don't rush and make mistakes. Get your documents in order, make sure the debtor name issue is resolved, then file your continuation. The 60-day window you mentioned gives you plenty of time to do it right.
Jamal Washington
One thing to consider is whether your loan documents have any specific requirements about maintaining continuous perfection. Some agreements have clauses that could technically put the borrower in default if the UCC filing lapses, even temporarily. Review your paperwork carefully.
0 coins
Jamal Washington
•Even if there's a technical default, most lenders will waive it if you're taking immediate corrective action. The key is showing you're handling the situation professionally.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Mansour
•Document everything you're doing to fix the situation. Your loan committee will want to see that you have a clear remediation plan.
0 coins
Connor O'Neill
Update us on how the refiling goes! I'm sure other people reading this thread will benefit from knowing how you resolved the situation. These kinds of real-world examples are so much more helpful than theoretical discussions.
0 coins
LunarEclipse
•Yes please update! I'm always worried about missing a continuation deadline and it would be great to hear how this resolves.
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
•These real situations are the best learning experiences. Good luck with the refiling and thanks for sharing what happened.
0 coins