Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
For what it's worth, I've found North Dakota's system to be more reliable than some other states, but you're right that the debtor name matching can be frustrating. The key is being really systematic about trying different name variations.
In my experience, the older systems tend to be more finicky. Some of the newer state portals are much more forgiving with name variations.
Agreed. The states that have updated their systems recently seem to handle debtor name searches much better.
This thread is making me feel better about my own search frustrations! Thought I was just bad at using the system properly.
Definitely not just you! Seems like a pretty common issue that people don't talk about enough.
Yeah, it's one of those things everyone deals with but nobody mentions until someone brings it up.
Join the conversation
Another thing to check - make sure you're using the current version of the Oklahoma UCC forms. They updated them in January and the old versions get auto-rejected now. Download fresh forms from their website.
The version number is in tiny print at the bottom of the form. Easy to miss but they're strict about it.
Learned this lesson the hard way. Used a form that was only 3 months old and got rejected for "obsolete form version.
For what it's worth, I've started doing a test search in Oklahoma's business database before every UCC filing. Copy the exact name format that comes up and paste it directly into the UCC form. Haven't had a rejection since I started doing this.
No problem. It adds an extra step but saves so much time in the long run.
That's basically what the Certana.ai tool automates - it cross-checks the names across databases and flags discrepancies before you submit.
Join the conversation
For anyone finding this thread later - also double-check that you're using the correct UCC1 filing number in your amendment. I've seen rejections for that too when people transpose digits.
Good point. Always verify the filing number against your original documentation.
The Certana tool mentioned earlier would probably catch filing number mismatches too. Seems like a comprehensive solution for document consistency.
This whole thread highlights why UCC work requires such attention to detail. One small formatting difference can derail an entire transaction timeline.
Absolutely. The devil is always in the details with secured transactions.
Makes you appreciate having good systems and processes in place to catch these issues early.
Join the conversation
Make sure you also double-check the state where you're filing. Some states are stricter about name formatting than others. Also verify the partnership is still in good standing before filing - I've had issues where the entity was dissolved but we didn't know.
How do you check if a partnership is in good standing? Is that on the Secretary of State website too?
Yes, most state SOS websites have entity search tools that show current status. Look for "active" or "good standing" status.
One more tip - take a screenshot of the entity information from the state database when you look it up. That way you have proof of how the name was formatted on the official records when you filed, just in case there are questions later.
That's brilliant! I never would have thought to document that but it makes total sense for audit purposes.
I do this too. Also helps if you need to file amendments or continuations later - you have the exact formatting saved.
Javier Gomez
For what it's worth, once you file the termination yourself and see how simple it actually is, you'll never use a service again. I was paying a lawyer $200 per UCC filing until I realized I could do it myself in 10 minutes.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Maktoum
•That's encouraging to hear. I'm definitely going to try the DIY route this time.
0 coins
Javier Gomez
•Just take your time and double-check everything. The worst that happens is a rejection and you fix it and resubmit.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
One more thing - if you're not 100% confident about filing yourself, some legitimate attorneys will review your termination form before filing for like $50-75. Way cheaper than these scam services and you get actual legal advice if there are complications.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Maktoum
•That's a good middle ground option. Thanks for all the advice everyone, feeling much more confident about handling this properly now.
0 coins
Malik Thomas
•Good luck with your filing! Hope you get that lien terminated without any more headaches.
0 coins