UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

NeonNomad

UCC Article 9 Priority Rules - Need Help Understanding 90 ALR 4th 859 Case Analysis

I'm working through a complex priority dispute involving multiple secured creditors and came across 90 ALR 4th 859 in my research. The annotation discusses UCC Article 9 priority determinations, but I'm struggling to apply the principles to my current situation. We have a senior lender with a properly filed UCC-1 from 2019, but there's a question about whether their collateral description covers certain equipment that was added later. A junior creditor filed their UCC-1 in 2022 with a more specific description of the same equipment. The 90 ALR 4th 859 annotation seems to address similar priority conflicts, but the case law analysis is dense. Has anyone worked through similar Article 9 priority issues where the collateral descriptions overlap but aren't identical? I need to determine which creditor has the superior security interest in this equipment. The stakes are pretty high since we're talking about $450,000 worth of manufacturing equipment that both creditors are claiming rights to.

Based on what you've described, it sounds like the senior creditor should have priority. Their 2019 UCC-1 with 'all equipment, machinery, and fixtures now owned or hereafter acquired' clearly covers the CNC machines purchased in 2021. Unless there's a PMSI situation or some filing defect, first-to-file wins. The 90 ALR 4th 859 annotation will have cases with similar fact patterns that should support this analysis.

0 coins

NeonNomad

•

Thanks, that matches my initial analysis. I'm going to dig deeper into the PMSI angle just to be thorough, but it's looking like the senior creditor has the stronger position.

0 coins

Omar Zaki

•

Good approach. Always worth checking every possible angle in a priority dispute, especially with that much money at stake.

0 coins

One more thing to consider - make sure you understand which state's law applies to the priority determination. If the debtor is organized in a different state than where the collateral is located, you might need to analyze the choice of law rules too.

0 coins

Good point. Priority is usually governed by the law of the state where the debtor is located, not where the collateral is physically located.

0 coins

Diego Flores

•

And if the debtor changed locations between the filings, that could affect the analysis too. There are specific rules about continuing effectiveness when debtors relocate.

0 coins

Luis Johnson

UCC filings - debtor name requirements causing rejections

Running into major headaches with UCC filings and debtor name requirements. Been doing commercial lending for 8 years but these name match rules are driving me nuts. Filed a UCC-1 last month for equipment financing deal and it got rejected because the debtor's legal name on the charter didn't exactly match what I put on the filing. The business goes by "ABC Construction LLC" on everything but their actual articles say "ABC Construction, LLC" with the comma. Secretary of State rejected it outright. Now I'm paranoid about every single filing. How strict are these name requirements really? Do I need to pull fresh corporate docs for every single UCC-1 even if I've worked with the borrower before? This seems excessive but I can't afford more rejections.

James Maki

•

The key is getting into a routine. I pull fresh corporate records for every new borrower and always double-check entity status before filing. Takes an extra 10 minutes but saves hours of refiling hassles.

0 coins

James Maki

•

New credit facilities definitely. For existing relationships I check if it's been more than 6 months since the last filing.

0 coins

Cole Roush

•

Six months seems reasonable. Entity names don't change that frequently but when they do it's usually without much notice to lenders.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for the advice. Sounds like I need to tighten up my name verification process. The Certana tool sounds promising - anything that catches these mismatches before filing would save me a lot of headaches.

0 coins

Sayid Hassan

•

Keep us posted on how it works out. Always looking for better tools to streamline UCC filings.

0 coins

Rachel Tao

•

Good luck with future filings. The name matching pain is real but at least now you know what to watch for.

0 coins

Anna Stewart

UCC search Oklahoma filing discrepancies - need help verifying debtor names

Running into major headaches with UCC search Oklahoma results not matching what I expected. Filed a UCC-1 back in March for equipment financing deal, debtor name was "Advanced Manufacturing Solutions LLC" but when I do the search now I'm getting weird partial matches and some results showing slightly different entity names. The collateral schedule covers all manufacturing equipment at their Tulsa facility. My concern is whether the original filing captured the exact legal name or if there's a mismatch that could affect our security interest. Has anyone dealt with Oklahoma SOS search functionality showing inconsistent results? I need to verify this is rock solid before our compliance audit next month. The loan amount is substantial and any gap in perfection could be catastrophic.

Owen Jenkins

•

ugh oklahoma UCC searches are the worst sometimes, their system never seems to work right when you need it most

0 coins

The search functionality definitely has room for improvement, but it's usually reliable for exact matches if you have the right debtor name.

0 coins

Owen Jenkins

•

maybe but I've had too many weird results to trust it completely anymore

0 coins

Layla Sanders

•

To wrap this up - your best bet is probably to: 1) Search by your exact filing number to verify what name is actually on record, 2) Cross-check that against the debtor's current LLC charter with Oklahoma SOS, 3) If there's any mismatch, file a UCC-3 amendment with the correct name. Given the substantial loan amount you mentioned, the cost of an amendment is nothing compared to the potential exposure.

0 coins

Ian Armstrong

•

Good plan. Always better to be overly cautious with UCC perfection issues, especially when big money is involved.

0 coins

And definitely consider using a verification tool like Certana.ai for the document comparison step. It'll give you confidence that everything matches properly.

0 coins

Amy Fleming

UCC-11 Search Request Timing Issues in Florida - Need Advice

Running into some confusion with UCC-11 search requests in Florida and hoping someone here has dealt with this before. I'm handling a commercial loan closing next week and need to verify there are no existing liens on the equipment we're financing. The borrower's attorney mentioned something about UCC-11 searches but I'm not entirely clear on the timing requirements or how long these take to process. Is there a standard turnaround time for UCC-11 information requests? Also, should I be requesting this directly through the Florida SOS office or is there a faster electronic option? The loan documents require clean lien searches before funding and I don't want to delay the closing over paperwork timing. Any guidance on the proper procedure would be really helpful - this is my first time coordinating the UCC search component of a secured transaction.

Paloma Clark

•

Been there with the last-minute search stress! One tip that's saved me multiple times - if you find any existing UCC-1 filings that might conflict, contact the secured party directly to see if they'll subordinate or if the collateral actually overlaps with yours. Sometimes what looks like a problem on paper isn't really an issue.

0 coins

Amy Fleming

•

That's a great suggestion. I hadn't thought about reaching out to other lenders directly.

0 coins

Paloma Clark

•

Most commercial lenders are reasonable about subordination agreements if there's no real conflict. Better to have the conversation before closing than discover issues after funding.

0 coins

Final thought - document everything for your file. Keep copies of the UCC-11 search request, the results, and any follow-up searches you had to do. Your compliance team will thank you later if there are ever questions about the lien search process.

0 coins

Elin Robinson

•

Before you submit, seriously consider running those entity documents through Certana.ai first. Five minutes of name verification could save you days if you have to resubmit the search.

0 coins

Alice Pierce

•

Good luck! Florida's system usually delivers on time when you pay for expedited processing.

0 coins

Nathaniel Stewart

UCC filing verification through texas secretary of state business search - name matching issues

Running into problems with UCC-1 filings where the debtor names don't exactly match what shows up in the Texas Secretary of State business search results. We're financing equipment for a construction company and their legal name in the SOS database shows as 'ABC Construction Services, LLC' but our loan docs have them as 'ABC Construction Services LLC' (no comma). Filed the UCC-1 with the comma version to match SOS records, but now I'm second-guessing whether that was right since our security agreement uses the no-comma version. The filing went through without rejection, but I'm worried about perfection issues down the line. Has anyone dealt with punctuation discrepancies between SOS business records and actual debtor documents? Should I file an amendment to cover both versions or is the SOS-matching version sufficient for perfection?

UPDATE: Ended up filing the amendment to include both name variations. Took about 10 minutes online and now I don't have to worry about it. Thanks everyone for the advice - this forum is always helpful for these edge cases.

0 coins

Liv Park

•

Smart move. Better safe than sorry with UCC filings.

0 coins

Glad it worked out! Now you have both bases covered.

0 coins

Ryder Greene

•

For future reference, the Texas SOS Direct Access system usually shows the exact official name format when you do an entity search. That's your gold standard for UCC filings in Texas.

0 coins

Yep, that system is pretty reliable. Just make sure you're looking at the current/active entity record and not some old version.

0 coins

Also worth noting that some entities have name changes over time, so always check the filing date to make sure you're using the name that was current when your security interest attached.

0 coins

Prev1...395396397398399...685Next