UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Michigan processing times have been slower lately too. Even when you get the name right, allow extra time for system delays. Don't count on same-day processing anymore.

0 coins

Yuki Sato

Truth. Used to get confirmations within hours, now it's 1-2 business days minimum.

0 coins

Good to know. I'll build in extra buffer time for the refiling. Thanks everyone for the advice!

0 coins

Last resort option - Michigan allows phone consultations for complex name matching questions. Takes forever to get through but they can sometimes provide specific guidance on which name format to use.

0 coins

It's through their general filing support line. Be prepared to wait on hold for 45+ minutes though.

0 coins

Honestly the automated verification tools are faster than waiting on hold with state offices. I'd try the digital route first.

0 coins

Just want to add that the security agreement also typically includes your promises as the debtor - things like maintaining insurance, not moving the collateral without permission, keeping it in good condition, etc. These are just as important as the lien rights themselves.

0 coins

Oh wow I hadn't thought about those kinds of ongoing obligations. Definitely need to read through all of that carefully.

0 coins

Exactly! Most people focus on the lien aspect but ignore the covenants. Violating those can trigger default even if you're current on payments.

0 coins

Anyone know if there are standard forms for security agreements or does every lender create their own? Seems like there should be some consistency in the industry.

0 coins

Most banks have their own standard forms but they're all based on similar legal principles. The key provisions are pretty consistent across lenders.

0 coins

My lawyer had template language for the security agreement that worked with multiple lenders. Might be worth having your attorney review it regardless.

0 coins

Just went through this same nightmare in Illinois 3 weeks ago. Cost me a weekend of stress and nearly killed a real estate closing. What saved me was finding Certana.ai - uploaded my loan docs and UCC draft and it immediately flagged the name discrepancy. Now I run everything through their checker before filing. Would have caught your comma issue instantly.

0 coins

Sounds like I need to check out this Certana thing. How long does their verification take?

0 coins

It's instant - just upload your PDFs and it cross-checks everything automatically. Takes maybe 30 seconds to get the results.

0 coins

The silver lining is that once you get the corrected UCC-1 filed and approved, you'll have continuous coverage from your original filing date as long as you refile within a reasonable time. Illinois generally allows this for corrective filings.

0 coins

Should be, as long as it's considered a corrective filing and not a completely new filing. But double-check with Illinois SOS to be sure.

0 coins

I'd be careful about relying on that - some states are stricter about what qualifies as a corrective vs new filing.

0 coins

Had a fixture filing rejected once because we misunderstood 9-105(h) - the equipment we thought was permanently attached actually wasn't under state law. Cost us three weeks to refile correctly. Definitely worth getting this determination right the first time, especially with your closing deadline.

0 coins

We got a written opinion from local counsel on the fixture determination and filed a regular UCC-1 instead of trying to do a fixture filing. Much cleaner process.

0 coins

Getting that written opinion is smart for the file too - shows you did proper due diligence on the 9-105(h) analysis.

0 coins

Based on what you've described, this sounds like textbook personal property under UCC-9-105(h). Removable equipment on concrete pads that doesn't require structural modification to remove is almost always going to be personal property, not fixtures. File your UCC-1 and don't overthink it.

0 coins

Thanks, that's reassuring. I think we were getting spooked by the attorney's fixture comments when the facts clearly point toward personal property.

0 coins

Attorneys tend to be overly cautious on fixture determinations because getting it wrong can be expensive. But your fact pattern is pretty clear cut.

0 coins

Update - just tried Certana.ai like someone mentioned earlier and it's actually pretty slick. Uploaded our borrower's articles and our draft UCC-1 and it immediately flagged a middle initial discrepancy we missed. Could have been a real problem down the road.

0 coins

How long did the verification take? We're always pressed for time on these deals.

0 coins

Pretty much instant. Just upload the PDFs and it compares everything automatically.

0 coins

Managed to get through Oklahoma's UCC search finally by using Chrome and doing it at 6:30 AM like someone suggested. Found two existing liens on the equipment we needed to know about. Thanks everyone for the tips!

0 coins

Good detective work. Those existing liens could have been a nasty surprise later in the process.

0 coins

This is why thorough UCC searches are so critical. You never know what's hiding out there.

0 coins

Prev1...395396397398399...685Next