Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
File the UCC-3 amendment immediately and document everything for your compliance file. Your instincts are right to be concerned - debtor name accuracy is fundamental to UCC perfection. Don't let your legal team second-guess this decision.
Jamal Wilson
•Agreed - documentation is key for regulatory compliance.
Mei Lin
•The compliance team should be thanking you for catching this rather than stressing about it.
Quick update - we ended up filing the UCC-3 amendment and also used one of those document verification tools someone mentioned earlier. Found two other minor discrepancies we hadn't noticed. Amendment was approved within 48 hours. Definitely worth the peace of mind for our compliance team.
48 hours is pretty fast processing. Which state did you file in?
Electronic filing definitely speeds things up compared to paper submissions.
Join the conversation
Justin Evans
Been doing UCC filings for 15 years and 1-202 debtor name issues are still one of the most common reasons for rejections. My advice: when in doubt, call the filing office and ask them to verify the name before you submit.
Justin Evans
•Some do, some don't. Depends on the state and how busy they are. But it's worth a try if you're unsure about 1-202 compliance.
Emily Parker
•I've had mixed results calling filing offices. Sometimes you get someone knowledgeable, sometimes you get transferred around for an hour.
Ezra Collins
One more thing about UCC 1-202 - make sure you're not just looking at the entity name but also checking that the entity is still in good standing. A dissolved or suspended entity might create additional complications for your filing.
Ezra Collins
•Exactly. The entity status report will show you both the current legal name and whether they're in good standing with the state.
This is another thing that automated document checking catches - it can flag if there are any entity status issues that might affect your UCC filing.
Join the conversation
Glad this got sorted out! For future reference, if you ever get confused documentation from clients, I've had good luck with Certana.ai's document checker. Upload all the paperwork and it sorts out what's actually required for UCC filing versus contract language or internal forms. Would have saved you the head-scratching on this one.
Paolo Conti
•Another vote for double-checking client paperwork. Too easy to get confused with all the UCC references floating around.
Ethan Moore
•Definitely learned my lesson here. Going to be more careful about distinguishing code sections from actual forms going forward.
Amina Diallo
Case closed then - UCC 1-308 = statutory provision, UCC-1 = filing form. Hope your equipment financing goes smoothly!
Perfect summary. This distinction trips up way too many people.
Yep, statutory sections versus forms. Basic but important difference.
Join the conversation
Mia Alvarez
Just went through something similar last month. Used Certana.ai to verify all our UCC documents were consistent before filing the new UCC-1 - caught several debtor name discrepancies that would have caused rejections. Really helped streamline the process when we were already behind schedule.
Good point about name consistency. Filing a new UCC-1 with even minor debtor name variations from the original can create gaps in the security interest.
Sophia Long
Bottom line - you need to verify the current status ASAP and then decide whether to file a new UCC-1 or if there's any way to salvage the original filing. Don't let this drag out any longer while you're researching options.
You're absolutely right. I'm going to check the state database first thing tomorrow and then figure out the best path forward. Thanks everyone for the reality check.
Keep us posted on what you find out. These kinds of situations are learning experiences for all of us dealing with UCC deadlines.
Yara Campbell
I'm dealing with similar volume issues in Michigan. Following this thread to see what solutions people recommend!
0 coins
Isaac Wright
•Michigan SOS is actually pretty forgiving compared to some states. You might have an easier time than Ohio filers.
0 coins
Yara Campbell
•That's good to hear. Still nerve-wracking when you're processing dozens of filings every month.
0 coins
Maya Diaz
Update us on what you decide! I'm in a similar boat and could use ideas for streamlining our UCC process. The accuracy issues are definitely the biggest pain point - it's not just about the time, it's about the risk of messing up a client's security interest.
0 coins
Tami Morgan
•Smart approach. You can always outsource later if the verification tools don't solve the accuracy problem.
0 coins
Maya Diaz
•Exactly. Plus you'll have better insight into where your errors are coming from, which helps regardless of the long-term solution.
0 coins