Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Ethan Wilson
For FSB UCC-1 filings, I always pull the entity info from multiple sources and compare them side by side. Sometimes the Secretary of State database, the entity's own records, and the UCC database all have slightly different name formats. It's ridiculous but that's the system we work with.
Ethan Wilson
•Yeah I pull from SOS database, FDIC records if applicable, and sometimes the entity's website or recent filings. Then I use the most complete/formal version for the UCC-1.
NeonNova
•This is way more thorough than what I do. Might explain why I get so many rejections on financial institution filings.
Yuki Tanaka
Update for anyone following this thread - got my FSB UCC-1 accepted after fixing the debtor name format! Turns out the entity was registered as '[Name] Federal Savings Bank' but I had filed it as '[Name] FSB'. Also used that Certana.ai tool someone mentioned and it caught two other potential issues I would have missed. Crisis averted and lender is happy.
Great outcome! I'm definitely going to check out that verification tool for my own FSB UCC filings. Seems like it could save a lot of headaches.
Join the conversation
Kaylee Cook
This whole thread is giving me anxiety about our own UCC filings lol. We have a bunch of equipment loans from different years and now I'm worried we might have similar issues with the continuation statements.
Better to check now than find out during a refinance or audit. UCC filing errors can kill deals fast.
Gavin King
•Definitely worth doing a comprehensive UCC audit annually, especially if you have multiple lenders or have gone through any business changes.
Update - I tried that Certana.ai document checker and holy crap it found the problem immediately. Two of the UCC-3 amendments had the debtor name spelled slightly different from the original UCC-1s so they weren't connecting in the search system. Now I know exactly which corrective amendments I need to file. Thanks everyone for the help!
Wait, you're not the original poster... are you having the same issue?
Oops sorry, different person but same exact problem with Texas UCC searches. This thread convinced me to check our filings and sure enough, found similar issues.
Join the conversation
This whole thread is reminding me why I hate UCC searches. The name matching rules are inconsistent, the collateral descriptions are vague, and you never know if you're seeing the complete picture. But for $180K, you definitely need to figure it out properly.
Mia Green
•Welcome to the wonderful world of secured transactions! It gets easier once you understand the patterns, but the first few times are definitely confusing.
At least nowadays we have better tools than we used to. Back in the day, this would have meant calling the filing office and hoping someone could help over the phone.
Just to close the loop on this - once you figure out which UCC-1 filings are active and relevant to your equipment, make sure you also understand what happens if there are existing liens. Some can be satisfied at closing, others might transfer with the equipment. Your purchase agreement should address how existing liens will be handled.
Smart approach. 'We'll handle it' is fine but you want to see the UCC-3 termination statements filed before or at closing to make sure the liens are actually released.
Emma Bianchi
•And get copies of everything for your records. You'll want proof that the liens were properly terminated in case any issues come up later.
Join the conversation
Ruby Knight
Once you get the name right, Washington's system is actually pretty efficient. But that first rejection can cascade into multiple problems if you're not careful about the exact requirements.
Lilah Brooks
•Washington processes correctly formatted filings faster than most states in my experience.
Their electronic system is solid when you give it what it wants. The challenge is figuring out exactly what that is.
Last resort option: you might want to have your attorney request a UCC search report for the exact entity. Sometimes seeing how other lenders filed against the same debtor can show you the accepted format.
UCC search reports are definitely worth the cost when you're stuck on name formatting issues.
Just make sure the search includes recent filings. Name formats can change if the entity amended their formation documents.
Ravi Gupta
This thread is making me paranoid about all my recent filings! Going to go double-check that they're all searchable now.
0 coins
Connor Murphy
•Good idea! I now make it standard practice to test searchability immediately after filing.
0 coins
Ava Martinez
•Smart move. Catching search issues early is so much easier than discovering them when a client asks for proof.
0 coins
GalacticGuru
Update us when you find it! Always curious to learn what the actual issue was for future reference.
0 coins
StarSeeker
•Will do! Hopefully it's something simple like the comma formatting.
0 coins
Freya Pedersen
•These threads always help me learn about edge cases I haven't encountered yet.
0 coins