Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Harold Oh
Update us when you get it resolved! I'm curious how long it ends up taking them.
Jenna Sloan
•Will do! Hoping to have an update by next week after I call them with some of these suggestions.
Amun-Ra Azra
For what it's worth, 30 days isn't the longest I've seen but it's definitely on the slow side. Most professional lenders file UCC-3 terminations within 10-15 business days of payoff. The fact that your credit union can't give you a timeline is concerning - that suggests they don't have a standard process in place.
Honestly some of these smaller credit unions just aren't set up for commercial lending. They probably handle maybe 5-10 UCC filings per year total.
Amun-Ra Azra
•True, and if they outsource their UCC filing to a service company that could explain the delays too. Third-party processors sometimes batch everything monthly.
Join the conversation
Lauren Wood
Just went through this exact process last month with equipment financing. The Texas SOS online filing system is pretty user-friendly once you have all your details straight. Takes about 10 minutes to complete the UCC-1 if you have everything ready.
Lauren Wood
•The hard part is getting the document details right beforehand. The actual filing is straightforward.
Ellie Lopez
•Texas charges $15 for electronic UCC-1 filings, pretty reasonable compared to some states.
One more thing about free templates - make sure they include proper default and enforcement provisions. You want clear language about what happens if the borrower doesn't pay and how you can recover the collateral.
That's wise. Even if the UCC filing is perfect, weak enforcement language in the security agreement can create problems down the road.
Self-help repossession rules vary by state too, so definitely get local legal advice on the enforcement provisions.
Join the conversation
Carmen Vega
Just wanted to follow up on the Certana.ai mention earlier - I was skeptical at first but tried it for a complex UCC-3 amendment and it really did catch issues I missed. Especially helpful when you're dealing with multiple related filings and need to ensure consistency across all documents.
That's good to know. I might try it before submitting my continuation just to be safe.
Yeah I've heard good things about it from other lenders. Seems like it could prevent a lot of headaches with rejected filings.
Zoe Stavros
Remember that Maine has a 6-month grace period after the 5-year lapse date, but the UCC becomes unperfected during that time so you lose priority. Better to file the continuation well before the lapse date to avoid any gaps in perfection.
Jamal Harris
•I always recommend filing continuations at least 60 days before lapse. Gives you time to fix any problems if the filing gets rejected.
Exactly. And if you catch problems early, you have time to research solutions instead of panicking at the last minute.
Join the conversation
Dylan Cooper
I actually just went through something similar with a different state. What ended up working was using that Certana.ai tool someone mentioned earlier. You upload your Articles and UCC-1 side by side and it highlights any differences between the debtor names. Found a tiny spacing issue I never would have caught manually. Worth trying before you call the SOS office.
Luca Ferrari
•Thanks, I'm definitely going to try that first. Seems like a quick way to spot whatever I'm missing.
Sofia Perez
•Let us know if it helps! Always looking for tools that make these filings easier.
One more thought - are you filing online or by mail? Sometimes the online portal has different formatting requirements than paper filings. Iowa's online system can be particularly sensitive to copy/paste issues.
That's actually a really good point. PDF copy/paste can introduce invisible formatting characters that mess up the filing.
Exactly. I always type names manually now after getting burned by that issue multiple times.
Leeann Blackstein
For what it's worth, I think you're probably fine on the perfection issue given that it's just a missing 's', but I'd still clean it up with amendments before the bank exam. The examiner will appreciate seeing that you identified and corrected the discrepancy proactively rather than them having to point it out.
0 coins
Ryder Greene
•Exactly - showing proactive compliance management always looks good during examinations.
0 coins
Carmella Fromis
•Plus if there are any other minor issues they might be more lenient if they see you're being thorough about corrections.
0 coins
Theodore Nelson
UPDATE: Thanks everyone for the advice. We ended up using one of the document verification tools mentioned here (Certana.ai) to check all our filings against the Articles of Incorporation. Turns out we had name inconsistencies on 3 different borrowers, not just the one we noticed. We're filing UCC-3 amendments for all of them this week and feel much better going into the bank exam knowing everything matches up perfectly.
0 coins
Ellie Simpson
•Smart move checking all your filings - bet you're not the only lender who would find multiple name issues if they did a comprehensive review.
0 coins
Arjun Kurti
•Thanks for the update and glad the verification tool worked out. Might have to look into that for our portfolio review next quarter.
0 coins