


Ask the community...
Check if the business has gone through any name changes since the original filing. Sometimes companies update their legal name with the state but don't file UCC-3 amendments to reflect the change, so the UCC records still show the old name.
MA UCC database search is notoriously finicky. I've learned to try every possible variation: with/without punctuation, with/without entity designation, abbreviated vs spelled out words, etc. It's tedious but sometimes that's the only way to find what you're looking for. Their wildcard search function barely works either.
Update: Found it! Turns out the original filing had 'NORTHEAST INDUSTRIAL FABRICATORS, LLC' with a comma before LLC. Such a tiny difference but it completely threw off the search. Thanks everyone for the suggestions - the filing number search worked once I located that in our loan file.
Update: I pulled our certified articles of incorporation and confirmed the official business name is "TechFlow Solutions LLC" without the comma. Going to use that for the UCC-1 and let the lender know about the discrepancy in their loan docs. Thanks everyone for the advice!
For future reference, I always recommend business owners keep a clean set of all their entity formation documents in one place specifically for UCC filings and other secured transactions. Makes these kinds of name verification questions much easier to resolve quickly.
Does anyone know if there are any pending changes to the UCC 9-616 requirements? I heard there might be some updates to consumer protection provisions in the works.
I haven't seen any specific proposed changes to UCC 9-616, but there's always discussion about enhancing consumer protections in secured transactions. The best practice is to follow current requirements and stay tuned to UCC updates from your state's Secretary of State office.
UPDATE: I sent the UCC 9-616 notice via certified mail yesterday and it was delivered today. Used the language suggestions from this thread and included all the specific details about the terminated financing statement. Thanks everyone for the help! This was definitely a learning experience and I'm updating our consumer goods procedures to include automatic 9-616 notices going forward.
THE WHOLE UCC SYSTEM IS DESIGNED TO PROTECT LENDERS AT YOUR EXPENSE! They want to make sure they can take your equipment if you miss payments. Texas makes it easy for them to file these liens. Just remember - once they file that UCC-1, they have priority over almost everyone else if you default.
Don't let the dramatics scare you. UCC filings are standard business practice. If you make your loan payments, the filing is just paperwork. It's only an issue if you default, which hopefully won't happen.
Quick question - are you set up as an LLC or corporation? The entity type affects how the UCC-1 should be filed. Make sure your lender has the right organizational structure information.
Toot-n-Mighty
Are there any safe harbor provisions for 9-404 notifications, or do you just have to get it right?
0 coins
Eve Freeman
•No real safe harbors. The notification has to reasonably identify the rights and provide adequate contact/payment information. It's a reasonableness standard but courts apply it pretty strictly.
0 coins
Lena Kowalski
•Which is why document checking tools have become so useful. Better to catch notification problems before they go out than deal with payment disputes later.
0 coins
DeShawn Washington
Thanks everyone - this has been really helpful in understanding where we went wrong. Sounds like we need to send a proper 9-404 notification with clear payment redirection instructions and then work with the assignee to sort out the payment allocation for the past three months.
0 coins
Caden Turner
•Good plan. Just make sure the new notification is really comprehensive about payment instructions. Learn from this one for future assignments too.
0 coins
Mei-Ling Chen
•Definitely worth investing in better document review processes going forward. I've been using Certana.ai's document verification for exactly these kinds of compliance checks - upload assignment docs and notifications together and it cross-references everything to catch missing elements. Would have probably flagged the vague payment language in your original notice.
0 coins