Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
The silver lining is that UCC filing expiration issues are fixable, just expensive and time-consuming. I've seen much worse situations where the original collateral descriptions were so vague that re-perfecting was nearly impossible. At least with equipment financing, you have specific assets that can be clearly identified and valued. Your bigger concern should be making sure this doesn't happen again - implement whatever tracking system you need to stay on top of renewal dates. The cost of good UCC management software is trivial compared to the cost of letting filings lapse.
Filing fees are usually under $100, but legal fees for document updates can run $2000-5000 depending on complexity. Plus potential appraisal costs, lien search fees, and the time value of delayed refinancing. It adds up quickly.
Ouch. That's more than I was hoping but less than I was fearing. Thanks for the realistic estimate.
One more thing to consider - make sure your new UCC-1 gets filed in the correct jurisdiction. If your business has moved or changed its legal structure since 2020, the filing location might have changed too. I've seen cases where people refiled in the wrong state and created even bigger problems. The debtor's location rules can be tricky, especially for LLCs and corporations that might have changed their state of organization.
We're still in the same state and same legal entity, so that shouldn't be an issue. But good reminder to double-check the debtor information for any changes.
Even small changes like adding 'LLC' to your business name or changing registered addresses can cause UCC search issues later. Worth being extra careful about exact name matching.
Join the conversation
Been there! Last year I had three UCC-1s all expiring within a month of each other. Talk about stress. The key is just staying organized and not overthinking it. File the continuation with current info, reference the original filing, and you're good for another 5 years.
Three at once sounds like a nightmare! I can barely handle tracking this one properly.
Yeah, it was definitely a learning experience. Now I have a much better system in place.
Quick question - are you sure about the debtor name change? Sometimes what looks like a name change is actually just a DBA or trade name situation. Worth checking the Secretary of State records to see what their official legal name actually is currently.
Exactly. Better to be 100% sure than to guess and have it come back to bite you later.
This is another area where document verification tools are helpful. Certana.ai can cross-reference your UCC filing against corporate records to make sure everything aligns properly.
Join the conversation
Update us when you get the refiling processed! Curious to see if the corrected name goes through smoothly. NY rejections are so frustrating because they rarely give detailed explanations.
Will do. Planning to file first thing tomorrow morning with the exact DOS name format.
Good luck! At least you caught it with a few days before closing.
For what it's worth, I've found NY to be getting pickier about debtor names over the past couple years. They used to be more forgiving with minor variations but now they seem to reject anything that isn't character-perfect.
I've noticed the same trend. They're definitely more strict than they used to be.
Makes you wonder if they changed their matching algorithm or just decided to be more rigid about enforcement.
Join the conversation
Just want to echo what others have said about getting the debtor name exactly right. We had a situation where a single-letter typo in the entity name caused perfection issues during a bankruptcy proceeding. Cost the client their security position on a $8M loan.
Yeah, it's one of those things that seems minor until it becomes a major problem. Triple-check everything.
This is exactly why automated document checking is so valuable. Catches those human errors that can be so costly.
One more thing to consider - make sure your security agreement language aligns with what you're putting in the UCC filing. I've seen situations where the collateral description in the UCC didn't match the underlying agreement, which created perfection gaps.
Definitely worth the extra review. Consistency between all the documents is crucial for proper perfection.
I always run the security agreement and UCC-1 by legal before filing. Saves headaches later.
Ella Harper
This thread is gold. We've been pulling our hair out over these rejections. Going to implement these suggestions starting Monday. Thanks everyone for sharing the specific details about what changed.
0 coins
PrinceJoe
•Same here. The collective knowledge in this thread is way better than anything I found in official documentation.
0 coins
Jason Brewer
•Glad this helped. The UCC filing community needs to stick together when the systems change without proper notice.
0 coins
Brooklyn Knight
Final thought - might be worth creating a shared document with all these new requirements until the official documentation catches up. Anyone interested in collaborating on that?
0 coins
Savannah Vin
•Great idea. I can contribute the collateral description requirements we've figured out.
0 coins
Makayla Shoemaker
•Count me in too. Between manual checklists and automated tools, we should be able to get ahead of these issues.
0 coins