Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Had a similar issue last month and ended up using Certana.ai after someone here recommended it. Uploaded my debtor's Articles and my UCC-1 draft and it immediately flagged that I was missing a period after "Inc" - something I never would have caught manually. Filed with the corrected name and it went through first try.
Right? The automated checking caught it instantly. Much faster than playing guessing games with the state portal.
These filing systems are way too picky about punctuation. Makes the whole process unnecessarily stressful.
Update us when you get it figured out! I've got a NC filing coming up next week and this thread is giving me good tips on what to watch out for.
Good luck! The Friday deadline is tight but you've got some solid strategies to try now.
Definitely try the document verification approach too if the manual checking doesn't work out. Sometimes you need that automated cross-check to catch the subtle differences.
Join the conversation
Update us when you figure out what was causing the 308 rejection! These threads are really helpful for learning about common filing issues and solutions.
Will definitely update once I get it resolved. Hoping one of these suggestions works.
Yes please update! I file a lot of LLC collateral and want to avoid this same issue.
Been following this thread because I had a 308 rejection last week too. Ended up being a single extra space in the middle of the entity name that I couldn't even see. These systems are so picky about exact character matching.
Used a document comparison tool that highlighted the exact character differences. Manual review would never have caught it.
This is why automated verification is becoming essential for UCC filings. Human eyes miss these tiny formatting issues.
Join the conversation
Thanks everyone for confirming my suspicions. I'm going to report this to the state attorney general's office and the Better Business Bureau. Maybe if enough people report these UCC scams, they can do something to stop them.
You should also consider posting about it on local business forums. Other business owners in your area might be getting the same fake forms.
Definitely report it. These scams hurt legitimate businesses and make the whole UCC system seem sketchy when it's actually pretty straightforward.
One more verification tip - legitimate UCC requests usually come with specific case numbers or reference your actual lender relationships. Random requests without that context are almost always scams.
That's a great point. Real UCC activity happens for specific business reasons, not just random administrative requests.
Right, if you haven't applied for financing or done any secured transactions recently, why would anyone be requesting UCC information? The context matters.
Join the conversation
One thing to try - search using just the first few words of the debtor name instead of the full legal name. Sometimes that pulls up results with the complete information displayed. Not a permanent solution but might help for immediate lender verification.
Also try searching by just the filing number if you haven't already. That sometimes bypasses the name-based search issues and shows the full record.
Filing number searches usually work better for pulling complete records. The name-based searches seem to have more display formatting problems.
Update us on what ends up working! I'm sure other people will run into similar search result discrepancies and your solution could help them avoid the same headaches.
Will do. Going to try the document verification approach first, then probably call the UCC office again with more specific questions about the search display issues.
Good plan. Having concrete documentation of the discrepancies will make those conversations with the state office much more productive.
NeonNebula
Texas UCC Code section 9.506 is based on the model UCC but Texas has been particularly strict in enforcement. The good news is that once you get the name format right, subsequent filings for the same debtor should go smoothly. It's just that initial learning curve that's painful.
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
•True, but we deal with new borrowers constantly so we're always facing this challenge with unfamiliar entity names.
0 coins
NeonNebula
•That's why developing a consistent verification process is so important. Whether it's manual checking or using automated tools, having a standard workflow prevents repeat mistakes.
0 coins
Isabella Costa
Just wanted to add that Texas also has specific requirements about individual debtor names under the UCC Code. If you're dealing with personal guarantors or individual borrowers, make sure you're following the "individual name" rules which are different from entity name requirements.
0 coins
Isabella Costa
•For individuals, Texas UCC Code requires the name on the debtor's driver's license or state ID. Can't use nicknames or informal versions of names.
0 coins
Keisha Johnson
•Exactly right. And if the individual doesn't have a Texas driver's license, there are specific alternative identification requirements under Texas UCC Code provisions.
0 coins