UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

UPDATE: Just wanted to follow up since this thread helped me figure out what to ask. Called my lender this morning and you were all right - it was a miscommunication. They needed a standard UCC debtor search in New Jersey, not some mysterious 'UCC 11' form. Apparently their loan processor was new and mixed up their internal checklist numbers with UCC form numbers. Got the search done through the NJ portal in about 10 minutes. Thanks everyone for the reality check!

0 coins

Classic case of overthinking a simple miscommunication. Happens to all of us.

0 coins

Perfect example of why direct communication beats hours of research when dealing with non-standard terminology.

0 coins

Great update Carmen! This is such a perfect example of why we shouldn't assume we're the ones who don't understand something when lenders use confusing terminology. I've seen this happen so many times - loan processors mixing up internal reference numbers with actual UCC form designations. It's frustrating but at least now you know for future reference. The New Jersey UCC portal really is straightforward once you know what you're actually looking for. Hope your closing goes smoothly!

0 coins

I've been seeing this type of address mismatch issue more frequently with Indiana UCC searches lately. The state's database seems to have some syncing issues between different record types. What I've found helpful is to run a quick business entity search on the debtor separately to see what address shows up there - if it matches what you're seeing in the UCC search, then you know the search is just pulling from their business registration rather than your actual UCC filing. Also, for peace of mind with your lender, you might want to consider getting a UCC search report from a third-party service like CT Corporation or Wolters Kluwer - they sometimes provide cleaner, more detailed results that clearly separate filing information from business registration data.

0 coins

That's really helpful advice about checking the business entity search separately. I hadn't thought about using a third-party service for cleaner results - that might be worth the cost just to have clear documentation for our lender. Do you have experience with CT Corporation's turnaround times? We're working against a tight closing deadline here.

0 coins

I ran into this exact same issue with an Indiana UCC filing about 6 months ago! The search kept showing our debtor's old address from their original LLC formation, but when I pulled the actual UCC-1 document, it clearly showed the current address we had filed with. What I learned is that Indiana's search algorithm sometimes defaults to pulling address information from the Secretary of State's business entity database rather than from the specific UCC filing record. The key thing is that your security interest is still valid as long as you filed the UCC-1 with the correct debtor name and current address - which it sounds like you did. I'd recommend pulling both a certified copy of your UCC-1 and running a separate business entity search on your debtor to show your lender exactly what's happening. This documentation should be enough to satisfy them that there's no issue with your filing.

0 coins

The bottom line is you need to be 100% certain about the debtor name before filing that continuation. CT doesn't give you much wiggle room on name matching. Get the current charter, compare it to your existing UCC-1, and if there's any doubt, consult with someone who specializes in UCC filings.

0 coins

Smart approach. Taking the extra time upfront to verify everything is always worth it when you're dealing with substantial loans and security interests.

0 coins

Let us know how it turns out. Always good to hear about real-world experiences with CT UCC filings, especially when there are name verification issues involved.

0 coins

I've handled similar Connecticut UCC name verification issues before. One thing I'd add to the great advice already given - when you pull that UCC search by filing number, also check if there were any amendments filed after your original UCC-1. Sometimes intermediate amendments can change how the debtor name appears in the system, which could affect what you need to match for your continuation. Also, CT allows you to call their UCC division directly if you have questions about specific filings - they're usually pretty helpful about clarifying name matching requirements for your particular situation. Given the loan size you mentioned, it might be worth that phone call for peace of mind.

0 coins

sounds like everyone's pretty confident about the addendum approach. I'd probably run it through one of those document checkers just to be extra sure everything lines up before filing, especially with your tight deadline.

0 coins

Yeah that makes sense. Better to catch any issues before filing than deal with rejection and refiling delays.

0 coins

Exactly why I started using Certana for complex filings. The verification step gives you peace of mind that everything's consistent.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for the detailed advice! This is really helpful. Based on what you've all shared, I'm going to go with the addendum approach using formal reference language like "See Schedule A attached hereto and incorporated herein" in the collateral description box. I'll make sure to include specific addresses for each location's equipment as Giovanni suggested, and I think I'll run it through one of those document verification tools before submitting to catch any formatting inconsistencies. Really appreciate the quick responses - this community is incredibly helpful for navigating these filing requirements!

0 coins

Welcome to the community, Luca! Great summary of all the advice here. One small addition - when you're preparing that Schedule A, consider organizing the equipment by location first, then by category within each location. Makes it easier for the filing office to review and also helps if you ever need to do partial releases later. The formal reference language you mentioned is spot on - that's exactly what NY expects to see.

0 coins

Summary for anyone else reading this: Illinois UCC-1 electronic filing is $25, UCC-3 amendments/continuations are $25, UCC searches are $15 per name. Paper filings cost more. Make sure debtor names match exactly or you'll pay twice. Portal registration takes time so set it up early.

0 coins

Perfect summary, thanks! This thread answered all my questions about Illinois UCC filing fees and more.

0 coins

Bookmarking this thread. Really helpful info about the name matching requirements especially.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for the comprehensive breakdown! As someone new to Illinois UCC filings, this thread has been incredibly helpful. One follow-up question - does the Illinois portal have any bulk filing options if you're submitting multiple UCC-1s at once, or do you have to process each one individually? With several filings to do, I'm wondering if there's a way to streamline the process beyond just having all the documents ready to go.

0 coins

Prev1...183184185186187...684Next