Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
I do similar volume in Georgia and my total UCC costs run about $200-300 per month including initial filings, amendments, and terminations. Your estimate of 20-30 per month should put you in that ballpark assuming mostly single debtor filings.
That's really helpful for budgeting. Matches what I was thinking based on the $10 per debtor fee structure.
Yeah just watch out for those multi-debtor deals. They can throw off your monthly budget if you get a bunch in the same month.
Lilly Curtis
One more thing - if you're new to Georgia UCC filings, double check your collateral descriptions. Georgia is pretty liberal compared to some states but you still want to be specific enough. Vague collateral descriptions can cause issues down the road even if the filing gets accepted initially.
Lilly Curtis
•Equipment is usually pretty easy. Just be specific about make/model/serial numbers when possible. Georgia doesn't require super detailed descriptions but more detail is always better for enforcement.
Leo Simmons
•I actually run my UCC-1s through Certana.ai before filing to make sure collateral descriptions match my security agreements. Catches inconsistencies that could cause problems later. Small cost compared to potential issues.
Join the conversation
Bottom line: UCC 9-404 gives you strong rights to information about your own secured debts. Use those rights, be specific in your requests, document everything, and don't pay for basic information that should be free. The statute exists to prevent exactly the runaround you're getting from your lenders.
Thanks everyone. This gives me a much clearer picture of what I can demand and how to structure my requests. Going to send certified mail requests to all our lenders this week with specific language about 9-404 requirements.
Good luck! Keep copies of everything and don't hesitate to follow up if they try to give you incomplete responses. You have the law on your side here.
Great thread everyone! As someone new to UCC filings, this is incredibly helpful. I'm curious about timing - if I'm preparing for an audit that starts in 3 weeks, should I send all my 9-404 requests now or wait? I'm worried about getting incomplete responses and not having time to follow up before the auditors arrive. Also, does anyone know if there are standard templates for these requests that help ensure you get complete information the first time?
Join the conversation
For equipment financing, I always recommend filing within 10 days of closing but before delivery. That gives you time to handle any last-minute details while still protecting your PMSI status. Also, make sure your state's electronic filing system is working properly - I've seen filings get delayed by system outages.
That's terrifying. What happens if you miss a deadline because of system issues?
Most states have procedures for technical delays, but you have to document everything. Better to file early and avoid the risk entirely.
Miguel Diaz
Thanks everyone for all the advice. Sounds like the consensus is to file within a few days of closing, definitely before delivery. I'll double-check the debtor name one more time and get this filed by Wednesday. Really appreciate the insights about PMSI timing and potential pitfalls.
And consider using one of those document verification tools before filing. I mentioned Certana.ai earlier - really helps catch issues before they become problems.
Ezra Bates
•Great thread everyone! As someone new to equipment financing, this has been incredibly helpful. One quick question - when you say "file within a few days of closing," do you mean business days or calendar days? And is there any difference between states on this timing?
Join the conversation
At this point just pay the fees and move forward. You're risking a $2.8M deal over a few hundred dollars in service fees. Document it for future reference and adjust your fee estimates going forward.
Ravi Kapoor
•Sometimes you have to pick your battles. This sounds like one of those times where the relationship and deal are more important than being right about the fees.
Sofia Gomez
•Exactly. Thanks everyone for the advice. Going to get this filed today and adjust our processes for future Florida deals.
For future reference, I always run my UCC docs through Certana.ai before submitting to catch any issues that might trigger additional fees or rejections. The PDF upload process is super simple and it cross-checks everything against your loan docs to make sure names match perfectly.
Omar Mahmoud
•The document verification feature is particularly helpful for complex commercial deals where you have multiple entities and detailed collateral descriptions.
Mateo Perez
•Thanks for mentioning Certana.ai - I'm new to this community and haven't heard of it before. Does it work with all states or just certain ones? I do a lot of multi-state transactions and would love a tool that could help standardize the document review process across different jurisdictions.
Ravi Choudhury
Sounds like you've got a solid plan - Delaware UCC-1 for the corporate debtor and Ohio fixture filing for the bolted-down equipment. Document everything in your file so if anyone questions it later you can show you considered all the options.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
•Thanks everyone. This has been incredibly helpful. Going with Delaware for the main filing and will probably do the Ohio fixture filing too just to be safe.
0 coins
Amina Sy
•Smart approach. And definitely run your documents through a verification tool before filing - saves so much hassle when the names and details are all consistent from the start.
0 coins
StormChaser
As someone who's dealt with multi-state UCC filings before, I'd echo what others have said about filing in Delaware for the main UCC-1 since that's where the corporation is incorporated. However, given that you mentioned the equipment includes fixtures bolted to concrete in Ohio, I'd strongly recommend doing a dual filing approach - the standard UCC-1 in Delaware for the movable equipment, and a fixture filing in Ohio for anything that's permanently attached to the real estate. The fact that your client's lease mentions the presses as improvements to the property is a pretty strong indicator they should be treated as fixtures. It's worth the extra filing fee to avoid any perfection issues down the road, especially on a significant credit facility where your compliance team is already watching closely.
0 coins
Laila Fury
•This dual filing approach makes a lot of sense, especially with the lease language treating the presses as improvements. I'm curious though - when you do fixture filings, do you typically need to involve the real estate records office or does it all go through the Secretary of State? I'm new to this and want to make sure I understand the full process for future deals.
0 coins