Washington ESD reasonable assurance - confused about my substitute teacher unemployment eligibility
I'm a substitute teacher in Spokane and just got laid off for the summer. When I tried to file for unemployment with Washington ESD, they mentioned something about 'reasonable assurance' and now I'm completely lost. My principal said there's a good chance I'll be called back in September but nothing is guaranteed. Does this mean I can't get unemployment benefits at all? I really need the income over the summer to pay my bills. Has anyone dealt with this reasonable assurance thing before?
54 comments


Amina Diallo
Reasonable assurance is basically when your school employer gives you written or verbal indication that you'll likely return to work the next school year. If you have reasonable assurance, Washington ESD typically denies your unemployment claim during the break periods between academic years.
0 coins
CosmicCowboy
•So even if it's just a 'good chance' I'll be called back, that counts as reasonable assurance? That seems unfair since nothing is actually guaranteed.
0 coins
Amina Diallo
•The key is whether it's in writing and how definitive the language is. A casual conversation about 'maybe' coming back is different from a formal letter saying you'll be offered a position.
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
ugh the reasonable assurance rule is so frustrating!! i work as a para and they always say 'we expect you back' but then sometimes they dont have the budget. meanwhile im broke all summer
0 coins
CosmicCowboy
•Exactly! It's like they want to have their cake and eat it too. Keep us hanging but also deny us benefits.
0 coins
Natasha Orlova
•You should definitely appeal if they give you reasonable assurance but then don't actually offer you a position when school starts. Washington ESD has to reverse those denials.
0 coins
Javier Cruz
I had this exact situation last year as a substitute teacher. The trick is getting through to Washington ESD to explain your specific circumstances. I spent weeks trying to call them during their busy periods. Finally discovered Claimyr.com which helped me get connected to an actual agent who could review my case properly. They have a video demo at https://youtu.be/7DieNd3C7zQ that shows how it works. Game changer for actually reaching someone who understands the reasonable assurance rules.
0 coins
CosmicCowboy
•How much does something like that cost? I'm already strapped for cash.
0 coins
Javier Cruz
•It's worth it when you consider how much time you save versus calling for hours. Plus if you get your benefits approved, it pays for itself immediately.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
•I've heard of Claimyr but wasn't sure if it was legit. Good to know it actually works for reasonable assurance cases.
0 coins
Malik Thomas
The reasonable assurance determination can be appealed if Washington ESD denies your claim. You have to prove that the assurance wasn't actually reasonable - like if they said you'd be back but then eliminated positions due to budget cuts or enrollment changes.
0 coins
CosmicCowboy
•How do you prove that though? Do I need documentation or is my word enough?
0 coins
Malik Thomas
•Documentation helps a lot. Save any emails or letters from the district. Also, if they do end up not calling you back or offering fewer hours than promised, that's strong evidence the assurance wasn't reasonable.
0 coins
NeonNebula
Wait I'm confused about something - if I work as a substitute teacher but also do tutoring on the side, does the reasonable assurance from the school district affect my whole unemployment claim or just the part related to the school job?
0 coins
Amina Diallo
•Good question. Washington ESD looks at your total employment situation. If the school job was your primary income and you have reasonable assurance there, it can affect your entire claim eligibility.
0 coins
NeonNebula
•That's ridiculous. So even though I lost my tutoring income too, I still can't get benefits because of the school job?
0 coins
Malik Thomas
•It depends on how Washington ESD calculates the wages. If the tutoring was reported as separate employment, you might be able to get partial benefits. Definitely worth discussing with an ESD representative.
0 coins
Natasha Orlova
Pro tip: if you're a substitute teacher and they give you reasonable assurance, document EVERYTHING. Keep records of how many days you actually worked the previous year, any communication about next year, budget discussions you overhear, etc. This stuff becomes crucial if you need to appeal.
0 coins
CosmicCowboy
•That's really good advice. I wish I had known this before I filed my claim.
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
•yes!! i learned this the hard way. now i screenshot every text and email from the school
0 coins
Emma Wilson
Another thing to consider - even if you have reasonable assurance for the school year, you might still be eligible for benefits during winter or spring break if those are considered separate benefit years. The rules get complicated but it's worth asking Washington ESD about.
0 coins
CosmicCowboy
•I never thought about that. Do you know if Christmas break counts as a separate period?
0 coins
Emma Wilson
•It can, but it depends on the length of the break and your specific employment contract. Washington ESD has specific guidelines for this.
0 coins
Isabella Costa
Honestly the whole reasonable assurance thing is just another way for them to screw over education workers. We're already underpaid and then they dangle the possibility of work to deny us benefits during breaks. It's infuriating.
0 coins
CosmicCowboy
•I feel this so much. It's like punishment for working in education.
0 coins
Natasha Orlova
•While I agree it's frustrating, the rule exists because they don't want to pay benefits to people who actually do have secure employment lined up. The problem is in how it's applied.
0 coins
Isabella Costa
•But that's the point - our employment ISN'T secure even with reasonable assurance. Budget cuts happen all the time.
0 coins
Javier Cruz
Update on my Claimyr experience - I used it again this year when I had questions about my reasonable assurance determination. Got through to Washington ESD in under 10 minutes instead of the usual 2+ hour wait times. The agent was able to explain exactly why my case qualified for benefits despite the school's letter. Definitely recommend it for anyone dealing with these complex education worker situations.
0 coins
CosmicCowboy
•That's encouraging. I might have to try it since I'm getting nowhere with the regular phone lines.
0 coins
Ravi Malhotra
•I was skeptical about services like this but honestly after spending 6 hours on hold last week, I'm willing to try anything.
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
just want to add that if youre a substitute AND you work summer school or esi programs, that can affect your reasonable assurance status too. i made the mistake of saying i MIGHT work summer school and they used that against me
0 coins
CosmicCowboy
•Oh no, I mentioned I might do some summer tutoring. Do you think that will hurt my case?
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
•just be careful how you word things. 'might' and 'considering' are different than having actual job offers
0 coins
Freya Christensen
For anyone still confused about reasonable assurance, Washington ESD Publication 259 has the detailed rules. Basically, you need reasonable assurance from your employer that you'll return to perform services in the same capacity and under the same terms. If any of those elements are missing or uncertain, you might still qualify for benefits.
0 coins
CosmicCowboy
•Where can I find Publication 259? I want to read the exact language.
0 coins
Freya Christensen
•It should be on the Washington ESD website under their publications section. Search for 'reasonable assurance' and it should come up.
0 coins
Malik Thomas
•That publication is really helpful for understanding the nuances. The 'same capacity' part trips up a lot of people who assume any education job counts.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
Quick question - if I'm a substitute teacher but the district hasn't given me any written reasonable assurance, just verbal, does that make a difference for my Washington ESD claim?
0 coins
Amina Diallo
•Verbal reasonable assurance can still count, but it's harder for Washington ESD to verify and easier for you to challenge. Written documentation is much stronger evidence.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
•Good to know. I'll make sure to ask for anything in writing if they expect me back.
0 coins
Natasha Orlova
One more thing to remember - reasonable assurance has to be for the SAME or SIMILAR work. If you were a substitute teacher but they're only offering you a cafeteria position, that's not the same capacity and shouldn't disqualify you from benefits.
0 coins
CosmicCowboy
•That's a great point. They offered me some custodial work over the summer but that's completely different from teaching.
0 coins
Natasha Orlova
•Exactly! Make sure Washington ESD understands that when you talk to them about your case.
0 coins
Chloe Davis
I've been through this reasonable assurance nightmare three times now. The key is persistence and documentation. Don't let Washington ESD brush you off with generic responses. Demand specific explanations about how their determination applies to your unique situation.
0 coins
CosmicCowboy
•How do you get them to give specific explanations? Every time I call they just read from a script.
0 coins
Chloe Davis
•Ask to speak to a supervisor or specialist who handles education worker claims. The front-line agents often don't know the detailed rules.
0 coins
Javier Cruz
•This is where Claimyr really helped me - they connected me directly to someone who understood these complex cases instead of getting bounced around.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
Final thought on reasonable assurance - even if Washington ESD initially denies your claim, you can still file weekly claims and appeal the decision. If you win the appeal, they'll pay you retroactively for all the weeks you were eligible. Don't just give up after the first denial.
0 coins
CosmicCowboy
•That's really good to know. I was thinking if they denied me initially, that was it.
0 coins
Isabella Costa
•Yes! I got approved on appeal after being initially denied. Took 6 weeks but I got all my back pay.
0 coins
CosmicCowboy
•Thanks everyone for all this information. I feel much more prepared to deal with Washington ESD now.
0 coins
Ethan Wilson
I'm a substitute teacher too and went through this exact situation last year. The "reasonable assurance" rule is really tricky - what matters is whether your district gave you a definitive commitment about returning, not just a casual "we hope you'll be back." Since your principal only said there's a "good chance" but nothing guaranteed, you might actually have a strong case for benefits. I'd recommend documenting everything - save any emails or texts from the school, and when you talk to Washington ESD, emphasize that you have no written guarantee and that substitute positions are inherently uncertain. Don't let them brush you off with generic responses. You deserve those benefits to get through the summer!
0 coins
Dananyl Lear
•This is really helpful advice! I'm actually in a similar situation as a substitute teacher and was wondering - when you say "emphasize that you have no written guarantee," should I specifically mention that in my initial claim or wait until I'm speaking with an agent? I'm worried about saying the wrong thing and hurting my case. Also, did you end up getting approved for benefits, or did you have to go through the appeal process?
0 coins
Emma Davis
•I'd mention it right in your initial claim application when they ask about your employment situation. Be honest but strategic - something like "my supervisor mentioned I might be called back but provided no written commitment or guarantee of work for the next school year." Don't wait until later because it shows you were upfront from the beginning. As for my case, I actually did get approved initially after explaining my situation thoroughly, but I know others who had to appeal. The key is being very specific about the uncertainty of your position. Also, keep calling if you get denied - sometimes you get different agents who understand the rules better. The reasonable assurance has to be truly "reasonable" and a vague "good chance" comment really shouldn't qualify.
0 coins