< Back to Washington Unemployment

Chris King

Former employer lying about termination reason to ESD - fighting false claims in my unemployment case

I'm in a really frustrating situation with my unemployment claim. My former employer terminated me last month and now they're telling ESD I did and said things that NEVER happened! They're claiming I violated company policies that I didn't even know existed and said inappropriate things to coworkers that I never said. I was actually let go because the new manager wanted to bring in his own team, but they're making up these false reasons to avoid paying unemployment. My claim has been in adjudication for 2 weeks now because of their statements. I submitted my side of the story but I'm worried ESD will just believe my employer since they're a bigger company. Has anyone dealt with a former employer lying to ESD about termination reasons? What evidence helped your case? Did you win your claim? I'm losing sleep over this because I really need these benefits to keep afloat.

Oh yeah, been there! My boss said I "abandonded my job" when actually they cut my hours to almost nothing trying to make me quit. They told ESD I just stopped showing up which was a total lie! You gotta gather EVERYTHING - emails, text messages, performance reviews, anything showing you were in good standing. Also get statements from coworkers if any are willing to speak up for you. The adjudicator will call both sides and interview you. BE CALM during that call even if your blood is boiling. If you get emotional they might think your defending yourself too hard. I won my case btw. ESD saw through their BS eventually.

0 coins

Thanks for the encouragement! I do have some good performance reviews from 3 months ago. The only coworker who might speak up for me is afraid of retaliation though. Did you have any kind of hearing or was it just the phone interview with the adjudicator?

0 coins

This happens more often than you'd think. When an employer contests a claim, ESD is required to investigate both sides. The good news is that in Washington, the employer has the burden of proof when they allege misconduct. A few important points: 1. Misconduct has a specific legal definition for UI purposes - it's not just any reason an employer doesn't like 2. Document timeline of events in detail before your adjudication interview 3. Stick to factual statements only - avoid emotional language or accusations 4. If denied, you have the right to appeal to the Office of Administrative Hearings I recommend reviewing the ESD Handbook section on misconduct disqualifications so you're prepared for questions they'll ask: https://esd.wa.gov/unemployment/handbook

0 coins

Thank you! I didn't realize the burden of proof was on them - that makes me feel a bit better. I'll definitely review that handbook section. Do you know how long adjudication typically takes these days? I submitted my initial claim 3 weeks ago and it's been in adjudication for 2 weeks now.

0 coins

my boss did the EXACT same thing!!!! said i was always late when i had punch cards proving i wasnt. i got denied at first but then i appealed and won. they just make stuff up because they dont want their UI taxes to go up!!!! its such BS. make sure u appeal if u get denied the first time, lots of people win on appeal.

0 coins

This is a good point - many claims are initially denied but later approved on appeal. The appeals process gives you more opportunity to present evidence and make your case. Keep in mind you only have 30 days from the date of the denial to file your appeal.

0 coins

The same thing happened to my neighbor and she was denied benefits initially. The whole system is rigged to favor employers. They can say whatever they want and ESD believes them because they pay into the system. It's totally unfair how they treat regular workers.

0 coins

I wouldn't say the system is entirely rigged. While it's not perfect, I've seen many cases where employees do win their claims even when employers contest them. The key is providing specific evidence that counters the employer's claims. ESD adjudicators are trained to evaluate both sides fairly based on the evidence provided and the legal standards for misconduct or voluntary quit situations. If your neighbor was denied initially, did she appeal the decision? The Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) provides a more formal setting where both sides can present their case in detail.

0 coins

I've been trying to reach ESD for weeks about a similar situation and it's impossible to get through! After 50+ calls and being hung up on repeatedly, I discovered a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that got me through to an ESD agent in under 25 minutes. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/7DieNd3C7zQ?si=26TzE_zGms-DODN3 When I finally talked to an agent, they explained exactly what evidence they needed to counter my employer's false statements. Made a huge difference in my case. Sometimes you just need to talk to an actual person at ESD to understand what's happening with your claim.

0 coins

Does that service actually work? I've been trying to get through for days and keep getting the "high call volume" message before it hangs up. At this point I'm desperate enough to try anything.

0 coins

Yes, it worked for me. I was skeptical at first but after wasting hours redialing I was willing to try anything. The agent I spoke with was able to see notes on my account that weren't visible in eServices and gave me specific guidance on what documentation would help my case.

0 coins

To answer your question about adjudication timing - it varies widely right now. Some claims are resolved in 2-3 weeks, while others can take 6-8 weeks depending on complexity and current workload. If your financial situation is becoming dire while waiting, you can request a hardship expedition, though these are only approved in specific circumstances. Regarding evidence, contemporaneous documentation is strongest - emails, texts, or notes written at the time events occurred carry more weight than statements written after termination. Also helpful are witness statements, especially from supervisors or HR personnel if possible.

0 coins

Thanks for the info about hardship expedition - I might need to look into that if this drags on much longer. I do have some emails from before my termination where my work was praised, so hopefully that helps. I'm just worried because the new manager who fired me only started 3 weeks before letting me go, so there isn't much documentation between us specifically.

0 coins

My brother had something similar happen at his warehouse job last year. The company claimed he damaged equipment on purpose but it was actually broken before his shift even started. He ended up having to go to a hearing thing with a judge. Kind of like court but over the phone. He won because the company couldn't prove anything. Just stick to your story and don't get flustered when they question you.

0 coins

Yeah those hearings can be intense!! I had one where the employer brought their lawyer and I was just by myself. Was super intimidating but the judge was actually really fair and made sure I could share my side properly. They know regular people don't have legal training.

0 coins

Some practical advice that might help your case specifically: 1. If the new manager only started 3 weeks before terminating you, this actually supports your narrative that the termination was about bringing in their own team rather than your performance. Point this out in your adjudication interview. 2. If you have performance reviews or positive feedback from before the new manager arrived, these documents establish a pattern of satisfactory work that was only "disrupted" after the new manager arrived. 3. Request your personnel file from HR immediately if you haven't already. By law, employers in Washington must provide this within 10 business days. This may contain documentation that contradicts their current claims. 4. If the "policies" they claim you violated weren't clearly communicated, that's important to emphasize. For UI purposes, employees generally need to be aware of expectations before being held accountable for them. 5. Document the timing of events carefully - when the new manager started, any changes in your duties or treatment, the termination meeting details, etc. A clear timeline often reveals inconsistencies in employer claims.

0 coins

Thank you so much for these specific suggestions! I didn't know I could request my personnel file - I'll do that right away. You're right that the timing with the new manager is suspicious, and I was never formally warned about violating any policies before being terminated. I'm putting together a detailed timeline now based on your advice.

0 coins

i had 2 go thru this last year my boss said i was on my phone all day but actully they just didnt have enough work. took 9 weeks to get any money but i won because they couldnt prove anything. the waiting is the worst part fr

0 coins

9 weeks??? That's so long to wait without income. Were you able to get all the back payments when your claim was finally approved?

0 coins

yea they paid everything back to my filing date but man it was rough waiting. had to borrow $ from family. if u can prove they lying u will get paid eventually

0 coins

One thing nobody mentioned yet - check your social media accounts and make sure there's nothing there your employer could use against you! My friend got denied because she posted something about being glad to be fired from her "horrible job" and the employer used it as evidence she wanted to leave. Delete anything questionable NOW before your hearing!

0 coins

This is excellent advice. ESD and employers increasingly review social media during contested cases. Even posts made to "private" accounts can sometimes be obtained and used as evidence. Be particularly careful about any posts made around the time of your separation that might contradict your statements to ESD.

0 coins

I went through almost the exact same situation 6 months ago! My former employer claimed I was "insubordinate" and "violated safety protocols" - complete fabrications because they were doing layoffs but didn't want to call it that. Here's what worked for me: I wrote a detailed chronological statement of everything that happened, focusing only on facts and dates. I included every email, text, and document I could find that showed I was doing my job properly. Most importantly, I stayed calm during the adjudication interview even though I was furious about their lies. The key thing is that ESD looks for consistency in stories and evidence to back up claims. Your employer has to prove their allegations with specific examples and documentation. If they're just making vague accusations without proof, that actually works in your favor. My claim took about 4 weeks to resolve, and I was approved. The adjudicator told me that employers who fabricate reasons often can't provide concrete evidence when pressed for details. Stay strong and stick to the facts - you've got this!

0 coins

I'm dealing with something very similar right now - my former employer is claiming I was "frequently absent" when I only called in sick twice in 8 months and both times I followed their policy exactly. They're just trying to avoid their unemployment tax increase. One thing that's helping my case is I kept screenshots of my work schedule and attendance records on the employee portal before they terminated my access. Also saved all the text exchanges with my supervisor about those sick days. The adjudicator I spoke with seemed really interested in the timeline and kept asking my employer for specific dates and documentation during their interview. Apparently they couldn't provide much concrete evidence beyond their initial statement. Don't give up hope - from what I've seen in this community, a lot of these employer fabrications fall apart when ESD actually investigates them thoroughly. The truth usually comes out during the process.

0 coins

That's really smart that you saved screenshots from the employee portal before they cut off your access! I didn't think to do that and now I'm kicking myself. It sounds like the adjudicator is doing their job properly by asking your employer for specific proof. That gives me hope that mine will do the same. Did they give you any sense of how long your decision might take? I'm at 2 weeks in adjudication now and the waiting is killing me financially.

0 coins

I'm going through the exact same nightmare right now! My former employer is claiming I was "disruptive to team morale" and "failed to follow supervisor instructions" - none of which ever happened. The reality is they hired a new department head who wanted to restructure and bring in their own people, but they're making up these bogus misconduct claims to contest my unemployment. What's really frustrating is that I have zero documentation of any disciplinary actions or performance issues because there weren't any! I had good performance reviews and never received any warnings. It's like they're banking on ESD just taking their word for it. I've been in adjudication for 3 weeks now and I'm stressed beyond belief. Reading through everyone's experiences here gives me some hope though. It sounds like a lot of employers try this tactic but can't actually back up their claims when pushed for specifics. I'm gathering every piece of positive feedback I can find - emails praising my work, my last performance review, even thank you messages from clients. Hopefully that will be enough to show their claims are baseless. This whole process is so anxiety-inducing when you're already dealing with job loss!

0 coins

I'm so sorry you're going through this too - it's incredibly stressful when you're already dealing with job loss and then have to fight false accusations on top of it! The fact that you have no disciplinary record actually works strongly in your favor. ESD adjudicators know that legitimate misconduct cases usually have a paper trail of warnings, write-ups, or performance improvement plans. Your strategy of gathering positive feedback is exactly right. Those client thank you messages could be particularly powerful evidence since they're from external sources with no bias. Also, if you can get any character references from former coworkers or supervisors (even informal ones), that can help counter vague claims about being "disruptive to team morale." Three weeks in adjudication is tough, but from what others have shared here, it sounds like thorough investigations often work out better for employees in the long run. Hang in there - the truth has a way of coming out when employers can't provide actual evidence to back up their fabricated claims!

0 coins

I'm so sorry you're going through this - it's incredibly frustrating when employers fabricate reasons to avoid paying unemployment! I went through something similar last year where my boss claimed I was "unprofessional with customers" when actually they were just cutting costs and didn't want to admit it was a layoff. Here's what really helped my case: I documented EVERYTHING in chronological order, including dates, times, and any witnesses present. Since you mentioned the new manager wanted their own team, that's actually a really strong point in your favor - it shows the real reason for termination wasn't your performance or conduct. A few things that made a difference for me: - I requested my complete personnel file from HR (they have to provide it within 10 days in WA) - I gathered any positive feedback, emails, or performance reviews from before the new manager arrived - I stayed factual and calm during my adjudication interview, never getting emotional even though I was furious The adjudicator ended up approving my claim because my employer couldn't provide specific evidence of their accusations - just vague statements. It took about 5 weeks total but I got all my back pay. Don't lose hope! Employers who lie often can't back up their claims when ESD digs deeper. You've got this!

0 coins

Thank you for sharing your experience - it really helps to hear from someone who went through the same thing! The timeline you mentioned (5 weeks total) is actually reassuring because even though it feels like forever when you're waiting, at least there's an end in sight. I'm definitely going to request my personnel file from HR tomorrow - I had no idea they were required to provide it within 10 days. That could be really valuable evidence, especially if there's nothing negative in there despite their current claims. Your point about staying factual and calm during the interview is so important too. I've been practicing what I want to say so I don't get flustered when they ask me about their false accusations. It's encouraging to know that employers who fabricate reasons often can't provide the specific evidence ESD needs. Fingers crossed my case turns out like yours!

0 coins

Washington Unemployment AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today