Former employer lying about termination reason to ESD - fighting false claims in my unemployment case
I'm in a really frustrating situation with my unemployment claim. My former employer terminated me last month and now they're telling ESD I did and said things that NEVER happened! They're claiming I violated company policies that I didn't even know existed and said inappropriate things to coworkers that I never said. I was actually let go because the new manager wanted to bring in his own team, but they're making up these false reasons to avoid paying unemployment. My claim has been in adjudication for 2 weeks now because of their statements. I submitted my side of the story but I'm worried ESD will just believe my employer since they're a bigger company. Has anyone dealt with a former employer lying to ESD about termination reasons? What evidence helped your case? Did you win your claim? I'm losing sleep over this because I really need these benefits to keep afloat.
22 comments
Rachel Clark
Oh yeah, been there! My boss said I "abandonded my job" when actually they cut my hours to almost nothing trying to make me quit. They told ESD I just stopped showing up which was a total lie! You gotta gather EVERYTHING - emails, text messages, performance reviews, anything showing you were in good standing. Also get statements from coworkers if any are willing to speak up for you. The adjudicator will call both sides and interview you. BE CALM during that call even if your blood is boiling. If you get emotional they might think your defending yourself too hard. I won my case btw. ESD saw through their BS eventually.
0 coins
Chris King
•Thanks for the encouragement! I do have some good performance reviews from 3 months ago. The only coworker who might speak up for me is afraid of retaliation though. Did you have any kind of hearing or was it just the phone interview with the adjudicator?
0 coins
Zachary Hughes
This happens more often than you'd think. When an employer contests a claim, ESD is required to investigate both sides. The good news is that in Washington, the employer has the burden of proof when they allege misconduct. A few important points: 1. Misconduct has a specific legal definition for UI purposes - it's not just any reason an employer doesn't like 2. Document timeline of events in detail before your adjudication interview 3. Stick to factual statements only - avoid emotional language or accusations 4. If denied, you have the right to appeal to the Office of Administrative Hearings I recommend reviewing the ESD Handbook section on misconduct disqualifications so you're prepared for questions they'll ask: https://esd.wa.gov/unemployment/handbook
0 coins
Chris King
•Thank you! I didn't realize the burden of proof was on them - that makes me feel a bit better. I'll definitely review that handbook section. Do you know how long adjudication typically takes these days? I submitted my initial claim 3 weeks ago and it's been in adjudication for 2 weeks now.
0 coins
Mia Alvarez
my boss did the EXACT same thing!!!! said i was always late when i had punch cards proving i wasnt. i got denied at first but then i appealed and won. they just make stuff up because they dont want their UI taxes to go up!!!! its such BS. make sure u appeal if u get denied the first time, lots of people win on appeal.
0 coins
Zachary Hughes
•This is a good point - many claims are initially denied but later approved on appeal. The appeals process gives you more opportunity to present evidence and make your case. Keep in mind you only have 30 days from the date of the denial to file your appeal.
0 coins
Carter Holmes
The same thing happened to my neighbor and she was denied benefits initially. The whole system is rigged to favor employers. They can say whatever they want and ESD believes them because they pay into the system. It's totally unfair how they treat regular workers.
0 coins
Sophia Long
•I wouldn't say the system is entirely rigged. While it's not perfect, I've seen many cases where employees do win their claims even when employers contest them. The key is providing specific evidence that counters the employer's claims. ESD adjudicators are trained to evaluate both sides fairly based on the evidence provided and the legal standards for misconduct or voluntary quit situations. If your neighbor was denied initially, did she appeal the decision? The Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) provides a more formal setting where both sides can present their case in detail.
0 coins
Angelica Smith
I've been trying to reach ESD for weeks about a similar situation and it's impossible to get through! After 50+ calls and being hung up on repeatedly, I discovered a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that got me through to an ESD agent in under 25 minutes. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/7DieNd3C7zQ?si=26TzE_zGms-DODN3 When I finally talked to an agent, they explained exactly what evidence they needed to counter my employer's false statements. Made a huge difference in my case. Sometimes you just need to talk to an actual person at ESD to understand what's happening with your claim.
0 coins
Logan Greenburg
•Does that service actually work? I've been trying to get through for days and keep getting the "high call volume" message before it hangs up. At this point I'm desperate enough to try anything.
0 coins
Angelica Smith
•Yes, it worked for me. I was skeptical at first but after wasting hours redialing I was willing to try anything. The agent I spoke with was able to see notes on my account that weren't visible in eServices and gave me specific guidance on what documentation would help my case.
0 coins
Zachary Hughes
To answer your question about adjudication timing - it varies widely right now. Some claims are resolved in 2-3 weeks, while others can take 6-8 weeks depending on complexity and current workload. If your financial situation is becoming dire while waiting, you can request a hardship expedition, though these are only approved in specific circumstances. Regarding evidence, contemporaneous documentation is strongest - emails, texts, or notes written at the time events occurred carry more weight than statements written after termination. Also helpful are witness statements, especially from supervisors or HR personnel if possible.
0 coins
Chris King
•Thanks for the info about hardship expedition - I might need to look into that if this drags on much longer. I do have some emails from before my termination where my work was praised, so hopefully that helps. I'm just worried because the new manager who fired me only started 3 weeks before letting me go, so there isn't much documentation between us specifically.
0 coins
Charlotte Jones
My brother had something similar happen at his warehouse job last year. The company claimed he damaged equipment on purpose but it was actually broken before his shift even started. He ended up having to go to a hearing thing with a judge. Kind of like court but over the phone. He won because the company couldn't prove anything. Just stick to your story and don't get flustered when they question you.
0 coins
Rachel Clark
•Yeah those hearings can be intense!! I had one where the employer brought their lawyer and I was just by myself. Was super intimidating but the judge was actually really fair and made sure I could share my side properly. They know regular people don't have legal training.
0 coins
Sophia Long
Some practical advice that might help your case specifically: 1. If the new manager only started 3 weeks before terminating you, this actually supports your narrative that the termination was about bringing in their own team rather than your performance. Point this out in your adjudication interview. 2. If you have performance reviews or positive feedback from before the new manager arrived, these documents establish a pattern of satisfactory work that was only "disrupted" after the new manager arrived. 3. Request your personnel file from HR immediately if you haven't already. By law, employers in Washington must provide this within 10 business days. This may contain documentation that contradicts their current claims. 4. If the "policies" they claim you violated weren't clearly communicated, that's important to emphasize. For UI purposes, employees generally need to be aware of expectations before being held accountable for them. 5. Document the timing of events carefully - when the new manager started, any changes in your duties or treatment, the termination meeting details, etc. A clear timeline often reveals inconsistencies in employer claims.
0 coins
Chris King
•Thank you so much for these specific suggestions! I didn't know I could request my personnel file - I'll do that right away. You're right that the timing with the new manager is suspicious, and I was never formally warned about violating any policies before being terminated. I'm putting together a detailed timeline now based on your advice.
0 coins
Logan Greenburg
i had 2 go thru this last year my boss said i was on my phone all day but actully they just didnt have enough work. took 9 weeks to get any money but i won because they couldnt prove anything. the waiting is the worst part fr
0 coins
Chris King
•9 weeks??? That's so long to wait without income. Were you able to get all the back payments when your claim was finally approved?
0 coins
Logan Greenburg
•yea they paid everything back to my filing date but man it was rough waiting. had to borrow $ from family. if u can prove they lying u will get paid eventually
0 coins
Rachel Clark
One thing nobody mentioned yet - check your social media accounts and make sure there's nothing there your employer could use against you! My friend got denied because she posted something about being glad to be fired from her "horrible job" and the employer used it as evidence she wanted to leave. Delete anything questionable NOW before your hearing!
0 coins
Zachary Hughes
•This is excellent advice. ESD and employers increasingly review social media during contested cases. Even posts made to "private" accounts can sometimes be obtained and used as evidence. Be particularly careful about any posts made around the time of your separation that might contradict your statements to ESD.
0 coins